It satisfies my needs because I am using VMware to VMware. It is using Zerto technology in the backend, and knowing that with Zerto, you can go from any cloud to any cloud or on-premises VMware. You can go to any cloud provider. In HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery, until now, there is only VMware to VMware mobility, and recently Azure was added as a target, but it does not have the full flexibility yet compared to Zerto. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery has not been here for long, and I assume that it is on the roadmap from HPE, but today, it is not on par. I am using VMware to VMware, so it works perfectly for my needs. There is less cloud integration as compared to Zerto. An area for improvement is the support for Hyper-V and KVM. In Zerto, there is Hyper-V support, but it is not yet there in HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery. I might look at Hyper-V. Because of all the things going on with VMware and Broadcom, I might consider migrating to Hyper-V. It would be useful if they add Hyper-V support as well over time.
Learn what your peers think about HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL]. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] provides a robust platform tailored for ensuring continuous data protection and seamless business continuity. With its reliable features, it is designed to minimize downtime and streamline recovery processes for diverse environments.Tailored for enterprises needing efficient disaster recovery solutions, HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery [EOL] integrates seamlessly into existing infrastructures. It reduces complexities associated with traditional...
It satisfies my needs because I am using VMware to VMware. It is using Zerto technology in the backend, and knowing that with Zerto, you can go from any cloud to any cloud or on-premises VMware. You can go to any cloud provider. In HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery, until now, there is only VMware to VMware mobility, and recently Azure was added as a target, but it does not have the full flexibility yet compared to Zerto. HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery has not been here for long, and I assume that it is on the roadmap from HPE, but today, it is not on par. I am using VMware to VMware, so it works perfectly for my needs. There is less cloud integration as compared to Zerto. An area for improvement is the support for Hyper-V and KVM. In Zerto, there is Hyper-V support, but it is not yet there in HPE GreenLake for Disaster Recovery. I might look at Hyper-V. Because of all the things going on with VMware and Broadcom, I might consider migrating to Hyper-V. It would be useful if they add Hyper-V support as well over time.