There are some required features are missing in the current program, which necessitates exporting data to Excel and making modifications manually. Reporting and discovery processes have been somewhat challenging. The software tends to overwrite assets when a product is moved to storage, and a new product replaces it. It would be beneficial if the software could retain the original asset while updating the information for the new product.
ManageEngine AssetExplorer has a lot to improve. However, the vendor of this solution has many solutions that are made for certain use cases. The solution could improve by having more mobile functionality and more protocols for connecting information.
System Center and ManageEngine AssetExplorer compete in IT asset management. ManageEngine AssetExplorer appears to have an advantage with its feature-rich offerings, surpassing System Center in this area.Features: System Center is known for integration with Microsoft products, efficient IT environment management, and comprehensive monitoring and automation. ManageEngine AssetExplorer offers advanced asset tracking, software license management, and flexible reporting tools, showcasing...
There are some required features are missing in the current program, which necessitates exporting data to Excel and making modifications manually. Reporting and discovery processes have been somewhat challenging. The software tends to overwrite assets when a product is moved to storage, and a new product replaces it. It would be beneficial if the software could retain the original asset while updating the information for the new product.
ManageEngine AssetExplorer has a lot to improve. However, the vendor of this solution has many solutions that are made for certain use cases. The solution could improve by having more mobile functionality and more protocols for connecting information.