One area for improvement is the customer support process. The specialization in support, while effective, can lead to delays and complexity in getting issues resolved. It would be beneficial if the support process were more streamlined.
Nowadays, the product has started to become a bit expensive in the market, at a time when Nutanix offers virtualization software, which is even cheaper when compared to VMware. In order to penetrate into the market, the pricing of servers like PowerEdge C and other HCI solutions should be lower. Price-wise, I would want to see the product offer more flexibility. The hypervisor offered by ESXi is not compatible with different types of hypervisors. In the case of Nutanix AHV, the hypervisor is compatible with the other types of hypervisors. The aforementioned aspects need to be considered for improvement in the product to achieve high scalability. There is some trouble with the stability part of the product, making it an area where improvements are required.
Data center management and disaster recovery have different life cycles and different licensing. It would be easier if data center management and disaster recovery were combined.
IT Infrastructure Project Manager at COMPUCOM MAROC
MSP
2022-11-17T12:00:39Z
Nov 17, 2022
It would be better if it worked with SMTP servers on the cloud. Right now, it only allows notifications via the SMTP server. In the next release, I would like to have a better processor.
The reliability needs improvement. We have had some issues. The issue is that Dell's no longer selling this product in the near future. It's almost the end of life.
Overall, it offers a lot of good features for the industry. I don't recall any that are lacking per se. We had a few minor issues with compatibility on the latest version during the installation process.
I can't think of anything that needs to be improved at the moment. A lot of evolution is occurring with Blade PowerEdge, including, what call, the blade servers. The VxRail should be opened to allow other virtualization platforms to be used.
Blade Servers are a compact and efficient solution designed to increase data center performance and optimize space. Their modular design allows for easy scalability and maintenance, making them a valuable investment for businesses of any size.
Blade Servers integrate multiple server blades within a single chassis, reducing the need for extensive cabling and power supplies. This results in improved cooling and energy efficiency. With the capability to host a variety of applications and...
For improvements, the iDRAC application isn't very intuitive to handle. We have it deployed on-premises.
The next release would be configured for the new server. For that, the service could be upgraded.
One area for improvement is the customer support process. The specialization in support, while effective, can lead to delays and complexity in getting issues resolved. It would be beneficial if the support process were more streamlined.
The solution’s pricing could be cheaper.
There has been an increase in quality issues.
The price must be improved.
Nowadays, the product has started to become a bit expensive in the market, at a time when Nutanix offers virtualization software, which is even cheaper when compared to VMware. In order to penetrate into the market, the pricing of servers like PowerEdge C and other HCI solutions should be lower. Price-wise, I would want to see the product offer more flexibility. The hypervisor offered by ESXi is not compatible with different types of hypervisors. In the case of Nutanix AHV, the hypervisor is compatible with the other types of hypervisors. The aforementioned aspects need to be considered for improvement in the product to achieve high scalability. There is some trouble with the stability part of the product, making it an area where improvements are required.
Data center management and disaster recovery have different life cycles and different licensing. It would be easier if data center management and disaster recovery were combined.
The product’s cost needs improvement. The cloud solutions are less expensive than this hardware-based platform.
The product’s pricing could be a little cheaper.
They should improve the solution's RNA process.
It should be improved in terms of future expansion. We should be able to have additional free slots for future extensions in terms of memory.
It would be better if it worked with SMTP servers on the cloud. Right now, it only allows notifications via the SMTP server. In the next release, I would like to have a better processor.
The current memory could be improved.
The reliability needs improvement. We have had some issues. The issue is that Dell's no longer selling this product in the near future. It's almost the end of life.
There could be some more ports added in the future.
A feature that needs to be added is the ability for full container storage.
Overall, it offers a lot of good features for the industry. I don't recall any that are lacking per se. We had a few minor issues with compatibility on the latest version during the installation process.
I can't think of anything that needs to be improved at the moment. A lot of evolution is occurring with Blade PowerEdge, including, what call, the blade servers. The VxRail should be opened to allow other virtualization platforms to be used.