Member Data Security Council of India at Techchef Consulting India Pvt Ltd
Real User
Top 10
2024-10-16T14:27:00Z
Oct 16, 2024
Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth. Additionally, the non-core features need to increase in depth.
CISO at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Reseller
Top 5
2024-07-03T07:39:44Z
Jul 3, 2024
One drawback is that it becomes so easy to use that users may lose the habit of manual checks and balances. As a security person, you should always worry about potential threats. If you have a very useful and easy tool, you might lose the ability to think differently and critically. For example, in a group of ten people, if nine think the same way and one thinks differently, you should consider the tenth person's perspective because they might have valuable insights. Having a great product is not always beneficial because you may become too dependent on it, which can be problematic in the long term. If you lose your critical thinking skills, you might not recognize when something abnormal is happening. While the system will notice, systems can have their own challenges and issues. I'm not criticizing the product itself but emphasizing the importance of not being overly dependent on machines. Similar to what we see with Tesla cars, no matter how advanced, there is always a chance things may not work as expected. So, the users need to prepare for that eventuality. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform has some add-ons that they sell as part of the whole suite, but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially get more business.
I haven't encountered any major issues with Seceon OTM. The complexity of the activities and logs is expected, and I appreciate the detailed dashboards.
There might be room for improvement in the Seceon Open Threat Management platform. For example, the management console could use some enhancements. The functionality of the product is not affected, but the management console itself could be improved. Overall, that's the only aspect that comes to mind for potential enhancement.
Learn what your peers think about Seceon Open Threat Management Platform. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
Chief Executive Officer at SST Infotech India Pvt Ltd
Real User
Top 5
2023-03-12T10:56:55Z
Mar 12, 2023
The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there.
Information Technology Consultant at a computer software company with 51-200 employees
Reseller
2021-12-02T19:53:25Z
Dec 2, 2021
In terms of missing features, it's too soon to say as I've only had two weeks with it. That said, one of the things that caught my attention is that a number of processes seem to take up CPUs. It's a huge amount of computational power. It's justified, of course, however, this puts the solution at a level that's too high for a small enterprise to handle. It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization.
Co-Founder and CTO at a tech services company with 11-50 employees
Real User
2021-01-15T22:10:49Z
Jan 15, 2021
It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft.
Seceon Open Threat Management Platform is a comprehensive cybersecurity solution that offers real-time threat detection, analysis, and response capabilities. It leverages advanced AI and machine learning algorithms to provide proactive threat hunting and automated incident response.
With its intuitive dashboard, users can gain complete visibility into their network, applications, and endpoints, enabling them to identify and mitigate potential risks effectively. The platform integrates...
Certain features, such as DLP, need to be improved as they are superficial and not in-depth. Additionally, the non-core features need to increase in depth.
One drawback is that it becomes so easy to use that users may lose the habit of manual checks and balances. As a security person, you should always worry about potential threats. If you have a very useful and easy tool, you might lose the ability to think differently and critically. For example, in a group of ten people, if nine think the same way and one thinks differently, you should consider the tenth person's perspective because they might have valuable insights. Having a great product is not always beneficial because you may become too dependent on it, which can be problematic in the long term. If you lose your critical thinking skills, you might not recognize when something abnormal is happening. While the system will notice, systems can have their own challenges and issues. I'm not criticizing the product itself but emphasizing the importance of not being overly dependent on machines. Similar to what we see with Tesla cars, no matter how advanced, there is always a chance things may not work as expected. So, the users need to prepare for that eventuality. Seceon Open Threat Management Platform has some add-ons that they sell as part of the whole suite, but not individually. If they sold them individually, they could potentially get more business.
I haven't encountered any major issues with Seceon OTM. The complexity of the activities and logs is expected, and I appreciate the detailed dashboards.
The dashboard has always been an issue. The latest version has taken care of most of the shortfalls.
The product should improve the triggering rate.
There might be room for improvement in the Seceon Open Threat Management platform. For example, the management console could use some enhancements. The functionality of the product is not affected, but the management console itself could be improved. Overall, that's the only aspect that comes to mind for potential enhancement.
The SOP they provided wasn't great. They offered training over Sherp Virtualization, and the Seceon leadership visited our location to explain everything in detail, but the documentation and training could be better. It isn't as effective as it could be. There's some room for improvement there.
It would be better if they offered global coverage.
The product could be improved by including sandboxing capabilities in the next release.
In terms of missing features, it's too soon to say as I've only had two weeks with it. That said, one of the things that caught my attention is that a number of processes seem to take up CPUs. It's a huge amount of computational power. It's justified, of course, however, this puts the solution at a level that's too high for a small enterprise to handle. It would be ideal with the processing was more manageable. Not many customers are willing to have a dedicated server with two CPUs and one TB of memory. The cost of this is huge for a smaller organization.
It is a standalone solution now. They need to make it into a cloud-based subscription model. It needs more compatibility for co-managed solutions. It can also have more threats and deeper integration with Microsoft.