We would like some additional features. Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments. Private clouds are becoming more common, and the integration lags with those compared to AWS, Azure, or GCP. So that would be room to improve.
Assistant Manager Network Security at Institute of Business Administration, Karachi
Real User
Top 5
2023-11-14T15:44:25Z
Nov 14, 2023
Reducing the number of application-related attacks and consolidating them into a standard platform would be highly beneficial. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not. It would be advantageous to have a more sophisticated detection system to identify and address all types of attacks promptly.
Software Asset Management/Software & Cloud Analytics Consultant at Crayon Group
Real User
Top 20
2023-08-08T14:43:24Z
Aug 8, 2023
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive.
The solution should offer different controls. The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers.
Security Specialist at a security firm with 51-200 employees
Real User
Top 20
2022-02-10T15:39:00Z
Feb 10, 2022
They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap.
Senior Cyber Security Specialist at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Real User
2021-10-05T12:06:11Z
Oct 5, 2021
The reporting in Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not as good as the reporting in Tenable SC. Tenable SC's reporting is extremely powerful. The reporting has a very limited customization capability. It would be beneficial if this feature could be enhanced.
IT Manager at a manufacturing company with 10,001+ employees
Real User
2020-06-07T09:08:59Z
Jun 7, 2020
It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly. We had some trouble integrating with ZeroNorth that required we contact technical support. This is an area that could be improved. We are currently running several different scanners and it would be nice to see all of them in one place. For example, Tenable.io is used for assets, whereas we have different solutions for mobile and websites. Having all of these integrated into a single dashboard would be helpful.
Security Consultant at a tech consulting company with 51-200 employees
Consultant
2020-01-30T07:55:00Z
Jan 30, 2020
I would like for them to add intervening proxy, whereby you can alter the get/put requests. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing traffic packets which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail.
Application security is a significant challenge for software engineers, as well as for security and DevOps professionals. It comprises the measures taken to improve the security of online services and websites against malicious attacks by finding, repairing, and preventing security weaknesses and vulnerabilities.
We would like some additional features. Sometimes it lags with different cloud environments. Private clouds are becoming more common, and the integration lags with those compared to AWS, Azure, or GCP. So that would be room to improve.
The platform's technical support services could be better.
The solution's dashboards could be improved and made more user-friendly. The solution should provide easier access to dashboards and reports.
Reducing the number of application-related attacks and consolidating them into a standard platform would be highly beneficial. Currently, some attacks are detected while others are not. It would be advantageous to have a more sophisticated detection system to identify and address all types of attacks promptly.
Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not very user-friendly and you need a lot of information to get proper reports. The tool's support is not very responsive.
The solution should offer different controls. The cloud and the on-premises versions have their own controllers, and there is no way to centrally manage controllers.
The dashboard could be more user-friendly. They should add more functionality to it. I'd prefer if they shared more pricing information
It isn't easy to manage vulnerabilities in Tenable.
They have a general dashboard for web application scanning, but the dashboards and reporting can be improved. They probably have some features in their roadmap.
The reporting in Tenable.io Web Application Scanning is not as good as the reporting in Tenable SC. Tenable SC's reporting is extremely powerful. The reporting has a very limited customization capability. It would be beneficial if this feature could be enhanced.
It would be great if there were a dashboard that is more user-friendly. We had some trouble integrating with ZeroNorth that required we contact technical support. This is an area that could be improved. We are currently running several different scanners and it would be nice to see all of them in one place. For example, Tenable.io is used for assets, whereas we have different solutions for mobile and websites. Having all of these integrated into a single dashboard would be helpful.
I would like for them to add intervening proxy, whereby you can alter the get/put requests. It is fully automated. Other web application testers programs are actually proxy software, and the proxy software gives you the flexibility of modifying the outgoing traffic packets which will actually help you in exploiting any vulnerability in detail.