Xygeni can be more automated. The team is currently working on auto-remediation pipelines, which could be really helpful. There is probably room for improvement, but for me, it is one of the best tools available right now.
Xygeni was highly effective for us, but there are areas where improvements could be made. More customization options for dashboards and reports would help teams tailor the platform to their specific metrics and workflows. I also occasionally encounter DevOps tools that are not yet supported natively. Expanded coverage for niche or emerging tools would make onboarding even smoother. These points, however, are minor compared to the overall value the platform delivers, especially given the strength of its AI-driven detection, remediation, and supply chain protection capabilities. It would also be an improvement for licensing with regard to on-premise variants. Perhaps we could have an on-premise option for standard subscription.
Business Development Manager at a security firm with 11-50 employees
Real User
Top 20
Jan 20, 2026
Xygeni could be improved if on-premise options were available starting from the starter packages, not only the enterprise models. For a perfect score, Xygeni would need to include a DAST model.
There should be more configuration options that make it easier to target the issues that are more important in your organization's context. There are different kinds of scanners, each of them targeted at detecting certain issues. As expected, scanners are agnostic and classify issues according to sensible defaults. But those default risk levels may or may not be a priority in your context. The ability to have more configurable options in this sense is desirable. The descriptions for the issues found can also be improved.
Application Security Tools are essential for organizations looking to protect their software applications from vulnerabilities that could lead to breaches or exploits. These tools provide automated solutions for identifying, managing, and mitigating risks associated with application vulnerabilities.These tools have gained recognition for their ability to integrate seamlessly into development pipelines, providing security teams with real-time data on potential risks. They support multiple...
Xygeni can be more automated. The team is currently working on auto-remediation pipelines, which could be really helpful. There is probably room for improvement, but for me, it is one of the best tools available right now.
Xygeni was highly effective for us, but there are areas where improvements could be made. More customization options for dashboards and reports would help teams tailor the platform to their specific metrics and workflows. I also occasionally encounter DevOps tools that are not yet supported natively. Expanded coverage for niche or emerging tools would make onboarding even smoother. These points, however, are minor compared to the overall value the platform delivers, especially given the strength of its AI-driven detection, remediation, and supply chain protection capabilities. It would also be an improvement for licensing with regard to on-premise variants. Perhaps we could have an on-premise option for standard subscription.
Xygeni could be improved if on-premise options were available starting from the starter packages, not only the enterprise models. For a perfect score, Xygeni would need to include a DAST model.
There should be more configuration options that make it easier to target the issues that are more important in your organization's context. There are different kinds of scanners, each of them targeted at detecting certain issues. As expected, scanners are agnostic and classify issues according to sensible defaults. But those default risk levels may or may not be a priority in your context. The ability to have more configurable options in this sense is desirable. The descriptions for the issues found can also be improved.