When assessing Static Code Analysis tools, consider these critical features:
Comprehensive language support
Customizable rule sets
Integration with development environments
Data visualization and reporting
Scalability and performance
The ability to support a wide range of programming languages is vital, enabling teams to work efficiently across different projects. Customizable rule sets allow developers to tailor analyses according to specific coding standards and practices. Seamless integration with developers' preferred environments ensures an easy transition into existing workflows and encourages regular use. Effective reporting features highlight vulnerabilities and improvements clearly, aiding in quick decision-making.
Scalability allows Static Code Analysis solutions to adapt to diverse project sizes, ensuring consistent performance regardless of codebase growth. High performance in scanning and reporting is important to maintain development speed. Prioritizing these features will lead to selecting a solution that enhances code quality and supports the development team's efficiency without disrupting existing processes.
Search for a product comparison in Static Code Analysis
Choosing the right static analysis software requires multiple components: 1. What are my business requirements and do I have champion BUs 2. What does your application portfolio look like (Lang. developed, Line of Code, etc.) and do we have a complete application inventory. 3. Who will manage the software and do they have the skillset (be honest, most teams ASSUME they do) 4. Next have a Proof Of Value with well defined POV success criteria that you've gathered from the BUs. 5. When looking at a Static Code Analysis software vendor, you may want to scope what Software Composition Analysis they integrate with as well. Over the past few years this has been highly critical part of AppSec programs. For instance, Veracode has their product SourceClear...CheckMarx previously integrated with WhiteSource, but that relationship ended. Synopsys has been working on their integration with Coverity and BlackDuck. Finally Fortify takes the vendor neutral approach and has integrations with BlackDuck, WhiteSource and Snyk where the plugins are open source and maintained by the vendor. Fortify's integration with SonaType takes it a bit deeper to validate if and where the 3rd party/open source code is instantiated within your code.
Key takeaway, many organizations will use 1 or more Static Code Analysis vendors to meet the business' needs. If you need a unified dashboard reporting for them all look at Saltworks Security Saltminer or contact me (Shameless plug)
Static Code Analysis offers an automated method to detect code defects early in the development process. It improves code quality by ensuring compliance with coding standards and is essential for maintaining reliable software.Static Code Analysis tools evaluate source code without executing it, identifying potential vulnerabilities, bugs, and non-compliance issues. These tools help developers address technical debt by finding issues that might lead to software failures if left unresolved....
When assessing Static Code Analysis tools, consider these critical features:
The ability to support a wide range of programming languages is vital, enabling teams to work efficiently across different projects. Customizable rule sets allow developers to tailor analyses according to specific coding standards and practices. Seamless integration with developers' preferred environments ensures an easy transition into existing workflows and encourages regular use. Effective reporting features highlight vulnerabilities and improvements clearly, aiding in quick decision-making.
Scalability allows Static Code Analysis solutions to adapt to diverse project sizes, ensuring consistent performance regardless of codebase growth. High performance in scanning and reporting is important to maintain development speed. Prioritizing these features will lead to selecting a solution that enhances code quality and supports the development team's efficiency without disrupting existing processes.
Choosing the right static analysis software requires multiple components:
1. What are my business requirements and do I have champion BUs
2. What does your application portfolio look like (Lang. developed, Line of Code, etc.) and do we have a complete application inventory.
3. Who will manage the software and do they have the skillset (be honest, most teams ASSUME they do)
4. Next have a Proof Of Value with well defined POV success criteria that you've gathered from the BUs.
5. When looking at a Static Code Analysis software vendor, you may want to scope what Software Composition Analysis they integrate with as well. Over the past few years this has been highly critical part of AppSec programs. For instance, Veracode has their product SourceClear...CheckMarx previously integrated with WhiteSource, but that relationship ended. Synopsys has been working on their integration with Coverity and BlackDuck. Finally Fortify takes the vendor neutral approach and has integrations with BlackDuck, WhiteSource and Snyk where the plugins are open source and maintained by the vendor. Fortify's integration with SonaType takes it a bit deeper to validate if and where the 3rd party/open source code is instantiated within your code.
Key takeaway, many organizations will use 1 or more Static Code Analysis vendors to meet the business' needs. If you need a unified dashboard reporting for them all look at Saltworks Security Saltminer or contact me (Shameless plug)