Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Fortinet FortiExtender Logo

Fortinet FortiExtender Reviews

Vendor: Fortinet
4.1 out of 5

What is Fortinet FortiExtender?

Featured Fortinet FortiExtender reviews

Fortinet FortiExtender mindshare

As of April 2025, the mindshare of Fortinet FortiExtender in the Wireless WAN category stands at 1.4%, down from 1.8% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Wireless WAN

PeerAnalyst reports based on Fortinet FortiExtender reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryWireless WANApr 16, 2025Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersApr 16, 2025Download
ComparisonFortinet FortiExtender vs Ubiquiti WirelessApr 16, 2025Download
ComparisonFortinet FortiExtender vs Ruckus Wireless WANApr 16, 2025Download
ComparisonFortinet FortiExtender vs Cambium Networks Wireless WANApr 16, 2025Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Ubiquiti Wireless4.040.9%89%74 interviewsAdd to research
Ruckus Wireless WAN4.137.5%93%56 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Room for Improvement

Pricing

Popular Use Cases

Service and Support

Deployment

Scalability

Stability

Review data by company size

By reviewers
By visitors reading reviews

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
14%
Insurance Company
11%
Media Company
9%
Financial Services Firm
5%
Consumer Goods Company
4%
Manufacturing Company
4%
Comms Service Provider
4%
Wholesaler/Distributor
3%
Construction Company
3%
Healthcare Company
3%
Legal Firm
3%
Pharma/Biotech Company
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Retailer
2%
Engineering Company
1%
Non Profit
1%
Paper And Forest Products
1%
Energy/Utilities Company
1%
Real Estate/Law Firm
1%
Cloud Solution Provider
1%
Educational Organization
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Logistics Company
1%

Learn more about Fortinet FortiExtender

Fortinet FortiExtender customers

Related questions

 

Fortinet FortiExtender reviews

Sort by:
Mohammad Al-Zard - PeerSpot user
Technical Manager / Fortinet Product Owner at SPACE DATA SYSTEMS
Verified user of Fortinet FortiExtender
Aug 4, 2022
Seamless with excellent integration capabilities and flexibility

Pros

"You don't need to have two different vendors to interoperate and get into comparability issues or inter-operability issues."

Cons

"What most of my clients are telling me is the price is a problem. "
Daniele Parodi - PeerSpot user
Senior Information Technology Consultant at Firstpoint Poland
Verified user of Fortinet FortiExtender
Jul 26, 2022
A scalable, stable solution with a central point management

Pros

"Management can be carried out from a central point."

Cons

"There is a huge downside because we need to remove and insert the SIM to get it working."
Find out what your peers are saying about Fortinet FortiExtender. Updated April 2025
847,862 professionals have used our research since 2012.
SE
Security Network Engineer at Freelance
Verified user of Fortinet FortiExtender
Sep 4, 2022
Integrates with external solutions, and unifies devices for centralized device management and control

Pros

"For me, the best feature of Fortinet FortiExtender is its integration with an external solution such as a 5G LTE broadband modem, wired modem, and cellular network. I also like that the product can be integrated into one device or a unified device, and that is one of its best features because it allows you to manage and centralize the control of every device."

Cons

"Though Fortinet FortiExtender has some security features, the product could still be improved by adding features similar to those in FortiGuard, such as antivirus, intrusion, prevention, and detection, as well as web filtering features. The product is also not as user-friendly, so that's another area for improvement. In the FortiGate UTM solution of Fortinet, there's software-defined or SD-WAN, and in the next release of Fortinet FortiExtender, I'd like to see SD-WAN embedded in the product. Most of the communication in Fortinet FortiExtender is related to WAN and Edge, so having an SD-WAN function in the product would be useful for integrating and controlling WAN communication."
MT
Network and Security Engineer at Neurones
Verified user of Fortinet FortiExtender
Oct 29, 2019
Very user-friendly, extremely simple to set up and good scalability

Pros

"The solution is extremely user-friendly."

Cons

"The engineering of the solution has some negative points, especially in terms of troubleshooting. It's difficult to troubleshoot when we have a problem. It's not like other products like Cisco or Palo Alto which make troubleshooting much easier."
DK
System Administator at Mahr EDV GmbH
Verified user of Fortinet FortiExtender
Jun 4, 2023
A stable product that is easy to use, integrate, and implement

Pros

"The product is easy to use and easy to integrate."

Cons

"The support could be faster and more responsive."
Jose-Rivera - PeerSpot user
Account Manager at Telefónica
Verified user of Fortinet FortiExtender
Feb 5, 2023
A good WAN connectivity solution that allows access via a mobile connection, but carries a high price point

Pros

"We appreciate that this solution can be used as an active secondary link as well as a backup."

Cons

"We would like to see some improvement in the price for 5G models, as they are currently very expensive."
CJ
Chief Executive Officer at Clemtech LLC
Verified user of Fortinet FortiExtender
Oct 28, 2021
Limitless scalability, reliable, reasonably priced, and the support is good

Pros

"The most valuable feature will be that it works."

Cons

"I would like to see them make it smaller in the next release so that it has a smaller footprint for mobile clients."
PeerSpot user
Co-founder and Chief Operating Officer at a tech company with 11-50 employees
Verified user of Fortinet FortiExtender
Mar 9, 2020
Stable and scalable but it should be more intuitive and user friendly

Pros

"The initial setup was was just beautiful. It was straightforward."

Cons

"The solution would be a lot better if it was a little bit more intuitive. Additionally, the help menu would be a lot better if it was easier to identify the items that I was looking for. I find the graphical interface a little bit difficult to navigate. And I find the font that is used on the HTML interface not conducive to being able to be read in low light situations."