Juniper MX Series Routers Reviews

They are primarily used for P&E, BGP, and carrier-grade NAT deployments. Also, for provider routers, MX-204/MX240/MX480 and MX960 for BNG deployments and Edge/Aggregation and core, and MX304 / 10003 and MX40 for Edge/Gateway for Service providers.

Juniper products are very good in terms of performance.  you place MX240/480/960 provider edge/Aggregation and Core Also good part of it you can use line cards and CB/RE with each other's(within MX-240/MX480/MX960). also few cards from MX960/480 can used in MX2020  i.e 

The following MPCs require an Adapter Card (ADC) in MX2020

• MPC1E
• MPC2E
• MPC3E
• MPC5E
• MPC7E

We are the system integrator. Normally we are using it in our projects.

Juniper Routers are used for our MPRS project with our clients. We have used the MPRS router. Apart from this, we have used SRX series of routers where the event requirement is there. And with switching also, we have used a Juniper router in our MPRS Integration Project.

The most important thing with the Juniper router is that feature-wise, lots of routers are similar. If I'm talking about the performance, it's at 99%. Apart from this, the hardware reliability is very good.

It lasts a long time. The end-of-life is approximately eight years. 

Juniper routers are very capable and can be scalable. 

We may also integrate it as an event solution in the Juniper Router SRX3.

The solution is pretty easy to set up after a bit of training.

Juniper is pretty good and pretty known right now for SRX3 where an SD-WAN solution is there. If we are not getting the MPLS connectivity in fiber, then we may use the 4D, and LD modems and get Juniper integration, router, and SRX fiber applications, which we may enable. 

The product provides us with automation capabilities.

The product is easy to use. It is more suitable for automation. It has very clear tags. Juniper is much better than anything in the market. It has robust devices.

We are basically an outsourcing company, so we provide services to our customers. In this case, Juniper was one of the vendors for one of our customers, which is an internet provider in the US.

So it's a service provider internet, and Juniper helps me with this.

The "Commit" feature stands out. When you try to commit commands, you have some options like sandbox config, leaving those temporary for 60 seconds. 

This feature allows you to commit configuration changes to the candidate configuration, and then review them for errors before committing them to the active configuration. 

Another feature that I like is the integration with Cisco routers. This allows you to connect Juniper MX routers to Cisco routers and have them work together seamlessly. We never have interoperability issues.

We're using them for our ISP backbone routers and for home networks. We're getting services as an ISP.

They have great capacities and are very reliable routers.

We use Juniper MX Series Routers to connect with the ISP and give us the internet.

Juniper MX Series Routers are easy to configure and easy to back up.

In general, it is our platform of choice. When we looked at it against Cisco, we settled on it. In general, it is the better version. All the services are okay, or better than Cisco, anyway.

The functionality and stability are great.

It's very easy to manage. 

Technical support is great.

It's scalable.

We are using Juniper MX Series Routers for internet connection and for importing and managing data. We are also using them for internal connectivity. They serve as a border between our initial team.

For the Juniper MX Series Routers, it plays a crucial role in our network. They offer numerous features, enabling multiple connections and handling various reports. The routers efficiently manage the number of switched fabric codes and process features based on the specific switch requirements. Previously, I utilized them for processing and addressing customer-side concerns. The routers have excellent documentation, making it easy to resolve any issues that may arise. It's excellent for customization, especially in tailoring the Windows configuration environment. Overall, dealing with this solution has been straightforward and efficient.