We performed a comparison between Cisco Enterprise Routers and Juniper MX Series Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."The solution has good performance."
"It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The most valuable features are security and throughput."
"The most valuable feature is the flexibility of the devices. Also, from a feature perspective, Cisco Enterprise Routers are complete."
"They have a good lifespan and they are easily managed."
"The quality is good. Cisco Enterprise Routers are stable and more reliable."
"Provides good capabilities and performance."
"We hardly have issues with Cisco equipment and I believe that reliability is the best part of Cisco."
"This product is very easy to use."
"I like that Cisco Enterprise Routers is a stable solution. Their technical support is also really good."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers has a CLR and it's more reliable and faster than others."
"The solution is stable."
"The product is easy to use."
"It is very stable and scalable."
"On the SRX, the firewall is very easy to configure, especially when you want to filter out traffic."
"Juniper Enterprise Routers is very flexible."
"Juniper MX Series Routers are easy to configure and easy to back up."
"The flexibility of the MPLS configuration is very good."
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Cisco is not granular if we compare it to Juniper."
"The solution is not easy to manage for people that do not have the experience."
"It would be better if Cisco had a User Interface (UI) that we could configure from a web browser. Right now, we only have a Graphical User Interface (GUI). I would like to see a new UI with a dashboard for configuration in the next release."
"It would be better if Cisco Enterprise Routers were more secure."
"Their software-defined paradigm requires significant improvement."
"Longer duration of support."
"They take too much time to reboot or restart. Whenever we hard reset them, they take time. Cisco should resolve this issue."
"The lead times are extremely high. Normally, it's six to eight months initially, and they prolong it to up to one year for new device delivery by Cisco."
"The setup was a bit complex."
"In terms of improvement, I would like for it to effectively protect against the broadcast storms, multicast storms, and DDoS attacks."
"The pricing is a bit too high."
"Most IT equipment now has graphical interfaces, and there is a need for the Juniper routers to have a more intuitive web interface."
"Finding market expertise is hard."
"The solution could improve by providing enhancements to built-in SDN or SDWAN."
"While it is challenging to pinpoint specific areas for enhancement, there is room for better support and updates for Ansible."
"Better documentation to assist with implementation would be helpful."
Cisco Enterprise Routers is ranked 2nd in Routers with 101 reviews while Juniper MX Series Routers is ranked 3rd in Routers with 33 reviews. Cisco Enterprise Routers is rated 8.6, while Juniper MX Series Routers is rated 8.8. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Routers writes "Allows us to configure NAS through Cisco activities and to create GRE channels with different sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of Juniper MX Series Routers writes "Good performance, long life span, and easy to set up". Cisco Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, HPE Enterprise Routers, OneAccess Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, whereas Juniper MX Series Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, HPE Enterprise Routers and ExtremeRouting. See our Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. Juniper MX Series Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
