We performed a comparison between Cisco Enterprise Routers and HPE Enterprise Routers based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Routers solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."It's an ideal gateway solution for small and medium businesses, i.e., around 300 devices can be easily handled."
"The solution has good performance."
"They are the best in failover switches. Their product line is excellent."
"Cisco Enterprise Routers are easy to use and the performance is good."
"The solution's initial setup process is easy."
"Provides good capabilities and performance."
"The documentation is very good."
"We appreciate that this solution performs well, regardless of the volume of traffic being fed through it."
"I think Cisco Enterprise Routers are excellent."
"Its routers are versatile, reliable, and capable."
"It is more durable than other products in the market."
"It has good scalability."
"These routers help us to provide high availability to our clusters."
"The solution's initial setup is straightforward."
"It makes it easy to update the network technology and manage multiple deals, all without needing technical knowledge."
"HPE routers are easier to manage than any other router I've used."
"Extensive support for cellular range for Wi-Fi technologies"
"There must be a more easy-to-use GUI."
"Cisco has acquired other companies, and due to this, there are many API-based integrations. There should be one platform that will enable a smooth integration. For example, Cisco acquired ThousandEyes, AppDynamics and Viptela. These are ideal solutions for big companies in terms of WAN connectivity. Cisco needs to ensure that there is a smooth integration mechanism in order to ease this process or point of integration."
"They need to improve cost efficiency."
"Some of the features could be more secure."
"The overall price of Cisco Enterprise Routers should be reduced, it is expensive."
"Cisco is not granular if we compare it to Juniper."
"The pricing could be improved."
"We would like to see an improvement in the price of this solution. It is currently more expensive than other comparable products on the market."
"When compared to PEPLink, Cisco Enterprise Routers are less flexible, and you cannot have more than one user."
"Better management tools are needed."
"Technical support could be better."
"The solution is expensive."
"Its customer service could be better for older equipment models."
"They should work on lowering their prices in Brazil to stay competitive with rivals and offer customers more affordable options."
"I'd like to see more security features, like support for different types of encryptions."
"Compatibility with other platforms could be improved."
Cisco Enterprise Routers is ranked 2nd in Routers with 101 reviews while HPE Enterprise Routers is ranked 6th in Routers with 7 reviews. Cisco Enterprise Routers is rated 8.6, while HPE Enterprise Routers is rated 8.2. The top reviewer of Cisco Enterprise Routers writes "Allows us to configure NAS through Cisco activities and to create GRE channels with different sites". On the other hand, the top reviewer of HPE Enterprise Routers writes "Durable and reliable with good networking capabilities". Cisco Enterprise Routers is most compared with MikroTik Routers and Switches, Huawei Enterprise Routers, Juniper MX Series Routers, OneAccess Enterprise Routers and MikroTik Cloud Router Switch, whereas HPE Enterprise Routers is most compared with Huawei Enterprise Routers, MikroTik Routers and Switches, Juniper MX Series Routers and Cisco Cloud Services Router. See our Cisco Enterprise Routers vs. HPE Enterprise Routers report.
See our list of best Routers vendors.
We monitor all Routers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
