Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Komodor Logo

Komodor Reviews

Vendor: Komodor
4.4 out of 5
Leave a review

What is Komodor?

Komodor is the missing piece in your DevOps toolchain - offering one unified platform from which you can gain a deep understanding of all of your system events and changes. We integrate with all of your tools, monitor changes and alerts and organize information on a clear digestible dashboard and provide you with the right context at the right time.

Get the Komodor Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Komodor, Red Hat OpenShift, Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform and more!
Komodor is the #13 ranked solution in Container Management software. PeerSpot users give Komodor an average rating of 8.8 out of 10. Komodor is most commonly compared to Red Hat OpenShift: Komodor vs Red Hat OpenShift. Komodor is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 45% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a computer software company, accounting for 15% of all views.
Buyer's Guide
Komodor
January 2026
Get the report
Helped 879,927 peers since 2012

Featured Komodor reviews

Read more reviews

Komodor mindshare

As of January 2026, the mindshare of Komodor in the Container Management category stands at 3.6%, up from 1.3% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Container Management Market Share Distribution
ProductMarket Share (%)
Komodor3.6%
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform18.9%
Amazon EKS13.3%
Other64.2%
Container Management

PeerResearch reports based on Komodor reviews

TypeTitleDate
CategoryContainer ManagementJan 13, 2026Download
ProductReviews, tips, and advice from real usersJan 13, 2026Download
ComparisonKomodor vs Red Hat OpenShift Container PlatformJan 13, 2026Download
ComparisonKomodor vs Amazon EKSJan 13, 2026Download
ComparisonKomodor vs KubernetesJan 13, 2026Download
Suggested products
TitleRatingMindshareRecommending
Red Hat OpenShift4.23.5%95%64 interviewsAdd to research
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform4.218.9%96%51 interviewsAdd to research
 
 
Key learnings from peers
Last updated Jan 13, 2026

Valuable Features

Komodor's key strengths include a centralized event timeline, rapid troubleshooting, Cloud AI for root cause analysis, deployment and service notifications, retention of deleted pod logs, and service overviews. Users appreciate its ease for those unfamiliar with Kubernetes, the ability to pinpoint versions and changes, precise historical data access, and increased uptime. Its effective metrics offer insights into CPU and memory utilization, enabling efficient resource allocation and issue resolution. It significantly reduces diagnostic time and enhances cluster management.
  • "Since adopting it, all the issues we faced while managing Rancher are gone, and we are seeing 100% availability for Komodor."
  • "Overall, Komodor is a very good platform for managing Kubernetes-related infrastructure, and as of now, my experience with Komodor is very positive."
  • "The most valuable aspect is the speed with which I can narrow down what's going on. Usually, I look at the overview of events and then the timeline of an event and the status of the logs to quickly check what's happening or what has happened."

Room for Improvement

Komodor users express a desire for enhanced cluster visibility and improved performance. There's concern over granting extensive access, preferring actions aligned to user roles through SSO. Metrics tracking and user activity should be integrated for decision-makers. Alert interfaces need to be more intuitive. Improvements in installation, availability, cost optimization, and feature inclusion like Tigera status are needed. The current audit log and service interaction insights require development for effective troubleshooting.
  • "I hope that the cost analytics and resource usage allocation areas will see further development. For example, where we can now see if the pods are over- or under-provisioned, I wouldn't mind higher-level development."
  • "One thing we don't have visibility into, which I would love to have, is metrics, such as user logins and usage. It's really hard to know what people are doing when I don't have any metrics on that directly."
  • "I like the alerts that Komodor provides, but I think the alert interface could be improved."

ROI

Many experience significant savings with Komodor, citing around a ten percent return. They report reduced developer hours and cost savings by replacing Datadog, as well as efficient self-service tools that improve operational focus. One noted a ninety percent return, while others found benefits realized quickly after deployment. Additionally, Komodor provided quick log access and potential future gains with ongoing integrations. Despite varied calculations, value was perceived as evident.

Pricing

Komodor users experienced varied perspectives on pricing and licensing. Many noted that costs scale with resources, suiting small start-ups with fewer resources and remaining affordable for larger enterprises. Some considered the per-node licensing model fair, though some found it on the higher end as organizations scale. Others compared it favorably to alternatives like Rancher, noting its competitive pricing. Overall, Komodor seems to offer a balanced cost structure across different business sizes.
  • "Other options pop up, but Komodor's pricing works well for our use case. It's fair, and we appreciate it. A lot of other vendors price their solutions in a way that would cost us disproportionately more money than they should. Komodor's pricing is reasonable in the way they calculate usage and value."
  • "The licensing model is fine. It is per node, which is good, but the pricing is high. Currently, I am fine with it, but I am a little concerned about the pricing as we scale. So, it is on the higher end. On a scale of one to ten, where ten is the most expensive, Komodor is a seven."
  • "We pay according to the number of resources we have; if we are a small start-up, we have fewer resources and thus pay less."

Popular Use Cases

Organizations primarily use Komodor for troubleshooting Kubernetes resources and visualizing deployments. It aids in monitoring clusters, optimizing setups, and ensuring application reliability. Operationally, it serves as a key tool for teams to access and understand system performance without direct cluster access. Developers interact with clusters, receive alerts, and address issues using Komodor's UI. Its integration with Pager Duty enhances proactive monitoring, facilitating efficient problem resolution and application management across major cloud platforms.

Service and Support

Komodor's customer service and support are praised for being responsive and effective, with swift issue resolution often within hours. Communication channels include a shared Slack and an in-app help feature. Some users find availability challenging due to time zone differences, particularly for teams on the US West Coast. They are valued for their responsiveness to feedback and maintain strong, enjoyable relationships with companies. Users generally rate their support highly, often a ten out of ten.

Deployment

Users found Komodor's initial setup straightforward and quick, taking only minutes to complete a Kubernetes deployment using a Helm chart. Usually, only one person was needed, but some teams involved additional members for full integration. Maintenance involves periodic updates, which are frequent. During the initial phases, feedback was utilized to enhance functionality. Users across various teams reported the deployment was painless, requiring little effort and quickly delivering value once live.

Scalability

Komodor is considered scalable, handling multiple nodes and clusters efficiently. While some encounter lag, others successfully deploy across many clusters with numerous users, noting high scalability in infrastructure. Feedback varies; some find it scales well with large setups, while others question its capacity with extensive clusters. Nonetheless, many agree it performs effectively in diverse environments without encountering significant issues.

Stability

Users have mixed experiences with Komodor's stability. Some report intermittent lags and small issues that require fixes, yet feel it's stable enough to rate it highly. A few have noted no instability over long-term use, highlighting rare small outages. While the system handles large data requests that occasionally slow performance, many consider it stable, especially after recent updates. However, performance inconsistencies remain a recurring observation among several users.
These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.
Download our Komodor Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.

Top industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
15%
Comms Service Provider
10%
Media Company
8%
Financial Services Firm
8%
University
6%
Manufacturing Company
5%
Photography Company
5%
Performing Arts
5%
Educational Organization
4%
Government
4%
Outsourcing Company
3%
Energy/Utilities Company
3%
Real Estate/Law Firm
3%
Recreational Facilities/Services Company
3%
Insurance Company
3%
Construction Company
3%
Retailer
2%
Venture Capital & Private Equity Firm
2%
Aerospace/Defense Firm
2%
Wellness & Fitness Company
2%
Logistics Company
1%
Wholesaler/Distributor
1%
Non Profit
1%
Hospitality Company
1%
Healthcare Company
1%
Recruiting/Hr Firm
1%
Renewables & Environment Company
1%
Think Tank
1%
Leisure / Travel Company
1%

Compare Komodor with alternative products

Go!

Learn more about Komodor

Related questions

  • 38
When evaluating Container Management, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
  • 50
Why is Container Management important for companies?

Product Categories

Product Categories
Container Management

Popular Comparisons

Popular Comparisons
Red Hat OpenShift vs Komodor Logo
Red Hat OpenShift vs Komodor
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor Logo
Red Hat OpenShift Container Platform vs Komodor
Amazon EKS vs Komodor Logo
Amazon EKS vs Komodor
Rancher Labs vs Komodor Logo
Rancher Labs vs Komodor
Kubernetes vs Komodor Logo
Kubernetes vs Komodor
Portainer vs Komodor Logo
Portainer vs Komodor
See all alternatives
 
Komodor Reviews Summary
Author infoRatingReview Summary
Technical Solutions Engineer at a leisure / travel company with 501-1,000 employees4.5I've had a very positive experience using Komodor to manage and visualize Kubernetes workloads, benefiting from its stability, Cloud AI debugging, and 100% uptime, though it could improve by adding features like Tigera status and CNI pod visibility.
Principal SRE at Cowbell Cyber4.5We use Komodor primarily for operational troubleshooting and developer enablement due to its centralized event timeline. Although its performance and alert interface need improvement, it offers excellent ROI by reducing developer hours and consolidating multiple tools into one.
Senior Staff Software Developer at Visier4.0We are an HR analytics company using Komodor to efficiently monitor and troubleshoot our Kubernetes clusters. Its valuable features include swift issue diagnostics and insightful metrics, though improvements in cost and resource optimization analytics would be beneficial. Komodor's pricing is reasonable for our needs.
DevOps Engineer at a retailer with 1,001-5,000 employees4.0We use Komodor in our multi-cluster setup to help less experienced operations staff diagnose issues. Its service overview feature provides excellent visibility and quick issue identification, reducing our repair time significantly. We chose Komodor for its standalone functionality.
Senior SRE at a computer software company with 501-1,000 employees5.0We switched to Komodor for better visualization and troubleshooting of Kubernetes deployments. Its event timeline and logging features are valuable, though improvements are needed in user metrics and audit logs. We couldn't find a more compelling open-source solution.
Director of Development Operations at Workiz Inc.4.5We use Komodor for troubleshooting and monitoring Kubernetes resources. Its valuable features include deployment notifications and status viewing. However, improved visibility is needed for comprehensive cluster insights. We've seen a 10% ROI, though it's primarily suited for developers.