Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Reviews

Name: Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure
Brand: Red Hat
Rating: 4.0 (6 reviews)

4.0 out of 5

6 reviews
100% willing to recommend

What is Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure?

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure - based on our leading OpenStack and virtualization platforms - provides co-located, scalable, software-defined compute and storage, driven by Red Hat Ansible Automation on economical, industry-standard hardware.

Get the HCI Buyer's Guide and find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure, VMware vSAN, VxRail and more!

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is the #25 ranked solution in HCI Software. PeerSpot users give Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure an average rating of 8.0 out of 10. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is most commonly compared to VMware vSAN: Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure vs VMware vSAN. Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is popular among the large enterprise segment, accounting for 57% of users researching this solution on PeerSpot. The top industry researching this solution are professionals from a manufacturing company, accounting for 16% of all views.

Buyer's Guide

HCI

March 2025

Get the category report

Helped 849,190 peers since 2012

Featured Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure reviews

systemar777972

System Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

My advice to those considering this solution is that they should get what they actually need. Red Hat is a big company and it is quite flexible in the kind of environment they support. There are other products we are aware of and tried, but they failed to support our application running on top of them. With the Red Hat KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine), we could play the tricks we needed to more easily to get our application to work. KVM was the key. On a scale from one to ten where ten is the best, I would rate this product as maybe a seven. It is not bad, but it is not perfect.

Read full review

it_user1176858

Head SDWAN SBU at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

I have been using Red Hat and there is a small hyper-converged solution called Zero Stack which I also use. We're in discussions with Red Hat in India to have some sort of enterprise agreement with them in the future. I'd recommend Red Hat to others. I'd rate it nine out of ten.

Read full review

reviewer1478439

Product Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

I would not recommend this solution. There are a couple of other solutions that are easy to manage and install, and they are also not expensive. We plan to keep selling this solution, but we are not 100% sure. I would rate Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure a four out of ten.

Read full review

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure mindshare

As of April 2025, the mindshare of Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure in the HCI category stands at 0.7%, up from 0.4% compared to the previous year, according to calculations based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

HCI

Key learnings from peers

Valuable Features

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is valued for its compact size, making it ideal for small configurations. Users appreciate its real-time automation capabilities for R&D workloads. The consolidation of management in a single console is highly regarded. Users find the system stable, scalable, and commend its support and regular updates. The ability to add diverse services is also noted as beneficial.

"I like that you can add other types of services."
"It is stable and scalable."
"The consolidation of the management in one control point is the most valuable. The whole infrastructure management is consolidated in just one console point. The documentation is also pretty good."

Room for Improvement

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure lacks stability and is not mature enough, causing issues during upgrades. Its licensing policy is challenging due to changes from CPU sockets to cores. It is not user-friendly and requires deep technical understanding, making it difficult to operate. Cloud deployment could be improved, and interoperability with other platforms is desired. Users find the initial investment high and professional services complex and costly. Enhanced user-friendliness and easier management are necessary.

"It should be more user-friendly, in my opinion."
"The main issue is the initial investment. It is an expensive product, and it should be cheaper.It should also be easier to use and manage. The professional service for this solution is quite complex and expensive."
"It is not user-friendly, and it is very difficult to operate. You have to have a deep understanding of the technical details of the infrastructure to implement it. When you compare it with VMware, it is totally different because the graphical user interface is not that easy to understand. It is not intuitive. To use it, you have to read a lot of documentation and even understand what is going on behind the solution. It is not for someone who has a little bit of knowledge.Currently, it is too complex. I need something that is easy to implement. It should have a basic configuration as well as a complex configuration."

Pricing

"It is quite pricey."
"Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is an open-sourced, low-cost solution with full features."

Popular Use Cases

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is primarily used for running legacy applications, desktop as a service in R&D, and various verticals like banking, oil and gas, and retail. It supports virtualization workloads, computing, and databases. Environments are set up with x86 servers and 10-gigabyte networks. It offers flexibility for deploying diverse applications, including proprietary products, acting as a small-scale cloud for organizations.

Service and Support

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure technical support receives mostly positive feedback. Some users experience delays in resolution times but maintain a good relationship with the support team, reporting preferred treatment. Users frequently engage with technical support and express satisfaction with response times and quality. Customer support is described as excellent and directly provided by Red Hat, though not all users have utilized it. In general, technical support is considered amazing.

Deployment

Users found Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure's initial setup generally straightforward. Deploying a small hyper-converged cluster with three or four nodes took a few days to a week, described as simple by some. It was considered not super complicated, though complexity arose in certain cases due to external issues. Implementation typically involved collaboration between multiple teams. Completion time varied, occasionally extending to two months when factoring in challenges beyond Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure.

Scalability

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is described as highly scalable by users. Some report scalability reaching up to 64 loads, supporting large numbers of R&D professionals. Users appreciate its scalability and stability; others mention potential limitations in certain setups, leading them to opt for alternative options. Various organizations size echoes positive impressions about scalability, indicating adaptability across diverse demands. Its capacity to expand by adjusting component sizes seems favorable based on user experiences.

Stability

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure generally maintains good stability. Users have reported satisfaction without encountering significant bugs or glitches. Smaller improvements between minor updates, like shifting from version 1.5 to 1.6, have caused some operational challenges, whereas larger expected changes during major updates, such as from version 1.6 to 2.1, are anticipated. Some users have only engaged with the installation process and have not commented on stability. Stability is acknowledged positively by multiple users.

These insights are based on the in-depth reviews provided by peers to help you make a better buying decision.

Download our HCI Buyer's Guide for additional reliable information.