Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure pros and cons

4.0 out of 5

6 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Pros & Cons summary

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is ideal for small configurations with automation for real-time workload deployment. It offers excellent scalability and stability, although its stability is questioned due to possible immature development. Infrastructure management consolidates efficiently into one control point, supporting service additions. Despite high initial costs and complex management services, improvement is needed in licensing policies and cloud deployment capabilities, especially as CPU cores increase.

Buyer's Guide

Get pricing advice, tips, use cases and valuable features from real users of this product.

Get the category report

Prominent pros & cons

PROS

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is ideal for small configurations due to its compact hardware size.

Automation features allow for real-time workload spinning during research and development.

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure offers excellent scalability and stability.

All infrastructure management is consolidated into a single control point, enhancing ease of use.

Extensibility with additional services is supported, increasing functional adaptability.

CONS

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is not stable and may be immature in its development.

The licensing policy needs improvement, as it is challenging to manage licenses based on the number of CPU cores.

Cloud deployment could be improved.

Initial investment is high, as Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is expensive and should be cheaper.

Professional service for Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure is complex and costly.

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Pros review quotes

systemar777972

System Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 13, 2019

The size of the hardware is what we need because it is very good for small configurations.

Read full review

it_user1176858

Head SDWAN SBU at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 30, 2020

The most useful feature is the solution's automation in terms of how we are able to spin up a certain workload in real-time when we are doing R&D.

Read full review

PaulSorelli

IBM Data & IA Technology Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 14, 2020

The consolidation of the management in one control point is the most valuable. The whole infrastructure management is consolidated in just one console point. The documentation is also pretty good.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, VMware, Sangfor and others in HCI. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

reviewer1478439

Product Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Jan 3, 2021

It is stable and scalable.

Read full review

teamlead968247

Team Leader Presales at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Oct 28, 2021

I like that you can add other types of services.

Read full review

reviewer1279482

Senior Product Manager at Supermicro Computer

Sep 30, 2020

Both the scalability and stability of this solution are excellent.

Read full review

Red Hat Hyperconverged Infrastructure Cons review quotes

systemar777972

System Architect at a transportation company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 13, 2019

This product is not so stable. Maybe it is just not mature enough in its development.

Read full review

it_user1176858

Head SDWAN SBU at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees

Jan 30, 2020

The licensing policy needs to be improved. They have a licensing policy based on the number of CPU sockets. Nowadays what has happened is that the license they are trying to move is based on the number of CPU cores. With the advancement in technology there are now more cores in a single CPU. It's been very challenging in terms of managing the license around everything. Today we have a processor with 24 and 32 cores on the same physical CPU.

Read full review

PaulSorelli

IBM Data & IA Technology Consultant at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Nov 14, 2020

It is not user-friendly, and it is very difficult to operate. You have to have a deep understanding of the technical details of the infrastructure to implement it. When you compare it with VMware, it is totally different because the graphical user interface is not that easy to understand. It is not intuitive. To use it, you have to read a lot of documentation and even understand what is going on behind the solution. It is not for someone who has a little bit of knowledge. Currently, it is too complex. I need something that is easy to implement. It should have a basic configuration as well as a complex configuration.

Find out what your peers are saying about Red Hat, VMware, Sangfor and others in HCI. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

reviewer1478439

Product Manager at a tech services company with 10,001+ employees

Jan 3, 2021

The main issue is the initial investment. It is an expensive product, and it should be cheaper. It should also be easier to use and manage. The professional service for this solution is quite complex and expensive.

Read full review

teamlead968247

Team Leader Presales at a comms service provider with 51-200 employees

Oct 28, 2021

It should be more user-friendly, in my opinion.

Read full review

reviewer1279482

Senior Product Manager at Supermicro Computer

Sep 30, 2020

The cloud deployment could be improved.

Read full review