AUTOMATE UI TESTING FOR ANY IOS OR ANDROID APP
Use script-free record and replay or choose from six languages, including Python and JavaScript, to create test automation scripts. Record repeatable and consistent gestures across any mobile device. Get full device control when creating automated UI tests. There is no modify or jail-break the app.
Separate the UI object identification from the test logic to build stable, easy-to-maintain automated tests. Seamless integration available with build server, source control systems, and defect management tools allows you to run automated mobile UI tests around the clock.
Cisco, J.P. Morgan, Boeing, McAfee, EMC, Intuit
The application is smaller than the transaction applications. It's a very delicate, complex application. Now I use it, however, it's just a test function for functional testing.
I use TestComplete ID for writing test, functional, scripting. There are a lot of features in this tool. It's more complete with click and playback and proper things.
There are a lot of features in this tool, making it more complete with click and playback and proper things. It is very effective for detecting breaks and also for verifying the needs of the application before deploying it or when introducing a new product.
There are complaints about not detecting all objects in the browser. I have to check and verify, and sometimes I have to bypass certain steps, which is a problem. I need to check the solution to understand why it's too detailed to detect or think of the browser.
I use Chrome. Sometimes in Chrome, it doesn't detect certain elements in the web application. That's the problem.
Also, when I run tests, I cannot export different types of logs in the same document. When I run different tests, it provides different logs, and these logs cannot be put in the same document. I have to compile them manually.
Additionally, the tool can manage WinRamp scripts. I would say SilkTest also allows me to run tests, and I can challenge the sequencing, but it doesn't always do this correctly.
I have been using the solution for almost 20 years.
If I have a problem, I resolve it myself. Still, when I want to delve deeper into scripting, checking the community forums is helpful. I find more technical solutions there.
The documentation is helpful for beginners. However, to become an expert, I need to seek more.
I use only TestComplete. I have used it a lot and for two years.
The solution is straightforward to use.
I use the product only for all related tasks. I handle updates and installations myself. I manage the queries as well.
The price is becoming more expensive every year. It’s growing. Previously, we had two licenses. Now we have one. The company is trying to reduce the costs, and the solution has become expensive.
It's straightforward to use. I'd rate the solution eight out of ten.
