Scalability is not something that I have had to concern myself with right now.

Currently, we have five people who use it to either tune the rules or find out answers to questions about the network and flows.

Scalability is favorable since the solution is actively being developed. Specifically, for firewall perspectives, scalability is satisfactory.

The scalability is easy, just add more licenses if needed, then turn up another virtual machine. It is pretty straightforward.

There will probably be a dozen of us actually utilizing AlgoSec. This will mainly be the network and security team, then the security team themselves.

The scalability is excellent. We are changing the architecture, including the remote agent. It has been easy to scale like this. 

I have a new client that is using it on the cloud, and it's as effective as the on-prem version. The scalability is very good. I would rate it eight out of ten.

The solution is scalable and we have approximately 50 users.

This solution works well in mid-size companies. 

We can add devices very quickly whenever we need to, with additional licenses.

The product performs well in the environment.

The scalability is good.

While we haven't tested it extensively, it has the capability to scale. We currently use it to manage eleven firewalls and nine routers. It has the ability to expand by adding more CPUs and memory.

From what I've heard and what I've read on their portal, it is pretty scalable. There are no issues around this.

It is scalable.

It's scalable. We have 10,000 users accessing services and the internet. We only have two users who are accessing and working with AlgoSec. They are security engineers.

The scalability seems very good. I haven't seen any restrictions if we were to bring in other hardware or other devices in terms of how to scale it out, either size-wise or vendor-wise.

We have our network group, which we use AlgoSec for, for investigating the risks, configuration issues and things like that. The security group uses it for risk ratings and compliance verification. Then we have a separate group, which is a different group of security that uses it for the firewall validation process. They're the ones that use it on a daily basis to investigate any firewall changes and tie those back to the original request and validate that they were implemented properly.

It scales well.

This product does scale very well and we never had a problem with performance.

Scalability is good if you choose the right sizing of hardware and design.

In terms of scalability, it's a license-based model to add license at any point of time when you have any new firewalls added in the portfolio.

This solution is very scalable.

We love the scalability of this product.

The solution is very scalable so far. 

I've always worked with the standalone version.

The solution is very scalable.

It easily scaled up to support our hundreds of firewalls.

It will be good as long as they can move this solution to hybrid or fully cloud deployments. 

No issues with scalability in our environment. We do not have a large number of managed devices as we only manage our 21 firewalls.

The scalability is available via:

High-Availability. AlgoSec appliances can be clustered for fault tolerance, ensuring availability if system components fail.

Disaster Recovery. AlgoSec appliances can automatically synchronize data with offsite appliances to provide redundancy and ensure data preservation in the event of a failure at the primary site.

Geographically Distributed Architecture. AlgoSec appliances can be deployed across distributed sites for the local collection of logs and rulesets.
This data is then efficiently transmitted to a central appliance for processing.

Load Sharing. AlgoSec appliances can be clustered to share data workloads across multiple appliances for faster data analysis and reporting.

Great.

The product is very scalable. We have never faced any issues related to the scalability of the product. 

Good, it has the ability to add more devices anytime.

This solution scales well from tens of devices to thousands.

It provides interoperability with all vendor firewalls and the scalability is much easier.

We've had no problems in terms of scalability.

I'm sure we will continue to add firewalls to it and we want to do more with the FireFlow.

I haven't personally done a lot of scaling projects with this product.

We haven't heard anything from clients that would lead us to believe they couldn't scale the solution if they needed to.

Scalability is really good with this tool as it is flexible, as long as we can move this solution to hybrid or fully cloud deployments. This is something we are really focusing on right now.

Our impression of the scalability is great.

This solution has no problem with scalability and is easily able to integrate with firewalls in their thousands.

The scalability is good.

We have added 10 more firewalls to our 14 existing and have had no performance or scalability issues.

Scalability is very good.

I believe that it could be better, and make sure different scenarios are possible.

AlgoSec is a much-needed tool for any organization as it helps in reducing manual effort when it comes to managing firewalls. 

So far, we haven't had any issues with scalability. We're at 100+ firewalls, all of them logging directly to the product without issue, and we're using it daily.

Scalability in this case really depends on whether the customer is able to provide the resources or not. It requires resources including memory, RAM, and those sorts of things. From a software point of view, I'd say it is very scalable. 

Not that great, they are improving though.

It's able to hit all the devices that I've put it up against and it was able to find rules that put our organization at risk.

It's a scalable solution but there is room for improvement in that area. It has a high-availability structure, but some features need to be distributed using a collector, for example.

The scalability is good. We have had to scale for some of our clients who have about 10 firewalls or 10 network devices, and they wanted to have more. All we had to do was acquire more licenses, then we just scaled. It is quite seamless.

In 2018.1 release the VIP always up is a great feature and a 3-way cluster is a good idea. 

Scalability-wise, this product is good.

It is highly scalable and more than meets the requirements for our environment.

This solution scaled to our entire enterprise in a seamless way.

AlgoSec has multiple form factors such as a hardware appliance, VM appliance, and software. The customer can choose the most suitable solution for their environment. Further, AlgoSec has three main components and the customer can purchase them phase by phase, based on their requirements and budget. It can scale up to the total ASMS solution using the same resources.

Not yet. 

The solution is scalable. We have close to 30 firewall admins.

In terms of scalability, the maximum that I have tried with AlgoSec is six clusters. Its scalability is good. The way that we can work with it is good because with every device you can see everything on the same dashboard. If you want to check the monitoring, you can always select the device to see. You can check the status by clicking the device. It's the same structure. The scalability is good but I have only worked with a maximum of six clusters so I can't tell you exactly when it comes to a high number of hours, if it is good or bad, but for the six that I have worked with, it's good.

We do have plans to increase usage of AlgoSec. I have explained to some of the customers about the application integrations, the visibilities, and the rule-based optimizations by using this feature. In terms of features, I am expecting that they'll amend that component to their environment. Since we are a system integrating company, when we propose a solution for a particular customer, we always propose to do firewalls. Therefore, we always add AlgoSec. When we are proposing it, we always submit AlgoSec automatically.

No scalability issues.

No scalability issues.

No scalability issues.

The scalability is very good.

No scalability issues.

Currently, the tool works well with large environments.

It may be necessary to create a distributed solution of the product on different servers (WEB / DB).

Scalability-wise, this product is good. You can increase capacity simply by buying more licenses.

We don't see scalability on this product as a showstopper. We are confident that we can grow without any impact.

It is a highly scalable solution as per my experience.

The solution's scalability is impressive.

No issues.

It has highly scalable architecture.

Over the period of two years, we have seen multiple enhancements being made available inside the product. One of the new requirements is on containers/Docker/Kubernetes where AlgoSec really needs to focus. I am not sure about the availability of the latest support release, however, these are booming technologies and we require solutions like AlgoSec to support them.

The scalability is good.

AlgoSec requires a large amount of processing power to perform its tasks, making it a piece of equipment that always requires monitoring to be optimally optimized.

This is a very scalable solution, built mostly on open source technology. The customer is allowed to extend its functionalities via the API to integrate with other solutions or existing automation.

Our deployments of AlgoSec are not large so we haven’t faced a scalability issue. The maximum AlgoSec deployment we’ve done is for about 100 endpoints and that is not a problem for AlgoSec.

Scalability seems to be one of the strongest points of this solution. Worldwide architecture with remote agents, or slave master architecture. Be careful in terms of how you will deal with the log management as to not impact your network. A distributed architecture can help.

There is no problem in the process of scanning and monitoring firewalls, and IP tables in
considerable quantities.

AlgoSec is not a scalable solution. Only I use AlgoSec in our company to do firewall management.

The system can be run on virtual machines, so we don't have any issue with scalability.

It has very good scalability.

At the moment, it gives us what we need. Next month, we will add new technologies to AlgoSec.

Scalability is fine especially as they just released their CloudFlow as well.

None.

I have not encountered any scalability issues. Each version usually improves performance and the amount of required disk space.

It is scalable. 

No issues with scalability.

Not at all.

We've not needed to scale it.

The solution is very scalable and allows you to add all the firewalls and devices you need.

It is also scalable on the licensing as you can start by buying only the Firewall Analyzer license with which you can start onboarding all the devices and completing the network diagram so that Algosec's has the whole picture and know all the paths from network A to B.

After that you are ready to start using FireFlow and you can buy the license only when you are ready to start deploying it.

The report takes time, and the virtual appliance is a resource consumer.

No issues encountered.

No issues encountered.

No, AlgoSec fit our size and is scalable.

No issues so far.

We need to carefully plan scaling AlgoSec.

It's expensive to get new licenses.

AlgoSec facilitates several form factors where customers can choose different options, including both hardware and software. For CloudFlow customers, we now have the SaaS model as well.

The HA solution is not good.

I have not encountered any scalability issues at all.

Nope.

This solution has a great scalability capacity.

It's been able to scale for our needs.

We have not encountered any scalability issues yet.

No issues encountered.

None.

No issues encountered.