Apiiro Reviews

Apiiro centralizes several repositories, allowing my organization to have its account there with administrators and developers having their own accounts and access. Each repository can have analysis focused on a specific branch. With that capability, Apiiro can read each commit and each change in the project, and detect business logic vulnerabilities, which is crucial in my development workflow.

In my day-to-day work, where I mostly take care of the pipeline and see how the connection from our code to production works, Apiiro has had a significant impact. Before going to production, it checks for vulnerabilities, vulnerable code, and outdated libraries. My workflow improved significantly with Apiiro, which already detected issues, sent links and suggestions for fixes, and provided recommendations on which libraries should be updated.

The UI sometimes helps but can also be a bit confusing. However, the main part, the dashboard, really helps us have an overall view of all the projects and all the branches we work on.

Apiiro has positively impacted my organization by helping me in my professional career, as I was able to discuss my daily work using Apiiro and fixing vulnerabilities in interviews, which was an important element that helped me secure a new position in security.

A significant improvement emerged with Apiiro, as previously we faced many code vulnerabilities, and it helped us prioritize what had to be addressed first while also offering insights about outdated libraries that needed updates.

Apiiro offers several features that I consider the best, such as the ability to have multiple developers and AppSec professionals working on the same project, and through the platform, we can see the number of vulnerabilities, generate reports, and integrate Snyk within our workflow. Before the code goes to production, Apiiro can read all that code and determine if everything is okay or if improvements are needed.

The reports generated by Apiiro and its integration with Snyk contribute to my development process by giving us visibility into what is actually vulnerable, as automation like Apiiro makes it much easier to track vulnerabilities without spending too much time manually checking for issues, thus generating meaningful reports afterward.

Apiiro manages permissions very effectively, which is interesting from an organizational standpoint because it allows us to separate which people can access a given project and designate project administrators who can approve or reject changes once a fix is made.

I found the accuracy and reliability of Apiiro's results to be very good, as it can predict issues based on its existing data.

Apiiro could be improved by providing educational content, potentially on YouTube or within the platform itself, which would be beneficial for open-source professionals, marking its presence in the market while maintaining the Pro version.

Having tooltips within the platform could enhance the experience for new users, guiding them through features and providing animations or introductory videos that could be disabled once users are familiar with the tool.

I have been using Apiiro for about four months, and it was a very good experience because of the visibility it gives us as developers, even without having much experience in security.

Apiiro is very stable and performs well.

Apiiro's scalability is impressive, as it supports all our projects across a large environment with over twenty different projects.

I never needed customer support for Apiiro since the tool provided all the support I required.

I had previously used tools such as Sonar's Community edition, but it didn't provide the same level of coverage and functionality as Apiiro, particularly across various frameworks and pipelines.

I remember a specific instance when we deployed a feature and identified forty critical vulnerabilities, which we mitigated to six informational and medium vulnerabilities, highlighting the effectiveness of Apiiro in reducing security flaws.

As a developer, I didn't experience any issues regarding costs and licensing setup, as my account was already configured, which meant I acted more as a regular user.

I evaluated Apiiro alongside Snyk, as they are similar tools within the realm of vulnerability management.

I would rate Apiiro a ten because it is very visible in the market and it helped me get a new job, where I can describe my day-to-day activity while using it. Apiiro is a very complete platform that aids in day-to-day work and helps in finding vulnerabilities in code and libraries, which makes it a valuable resource. My organization had its own Apiiro URL, which allowed us to connect seamlessly to the tool. I advise anyone considering using Apiiro to proceed with confidence, as it provides significant visibility into code, libraries, workflow, and project infrastructure while assisting developers in managing vulnerabilities effectively.

My only use case is the reporting, which is correct. My role is limited because this is an additional role that I do on top of my day job, so it is only limited to pulling out reports and working with the respective engineering or support teams.

The positive impact I have seen from working with Apiiro for my company includes the metrics that we get from Apiiro, which have been extremely helpful. I get the overall report which captures the closed risks, open risks, and how the Mean Time To Remediate (MTTR) is doing. It definitely tells a lot about how the particular portfolio is doing, so we know who the best actors are and who the bad actors are. We try to call out these bad actors who are struggling, and we are clear about which portfolios need help, while we try to celebrate the top ones.

The metrics look great, but I would love to explore more on Apiiro and see how we can improve our vulnerability management piece, where we want to help our portfolios improve, remediate, and bring down all critical vulnerabilities to zero. That's the ambition.

The features and capabilities of Apiiro that I have found the most valuable so far are its reporting capabilities, which basically tell me how these applications are doing in terms of each month. I can see January, February, March, how these are performing, giving me a view on their consistency and any early measures I need to take to help these projects or portfolios. I can decide on constant offenders, those which are consistently not performing well, and I can reach out to them.

It tells me the risks when they were reported and how old they have been, and also tells me the due date by when these need to be remediated. Since I cannot go through each vulnerability or risk one by one, I can just do a filter in Excel and understand which ones have breached, making it clear to me which ones I need to chase. It also collects information from various sources such as Wiz, SonarQube, SonarLint, and Dependabot, so it gives us a holistic view of how these applications are performing.

My first feedback for Apiiro is that it is very slow, extremely slow. The moment I select from the entire list of repositories in my vertical, which is almost more than 400 repositories, it takes a lot of time for me to load the report. Sometimes it fails. I do not have Role-Based Access Control (RBAC). It's only given to the application security team, and Apiiro as a vendor does not have the rollback access control enabled for the clients, so that would have given me access to the reports tab, which would have made my life easier. Currently, I have to go to the risks tab to pull out all this information.

I started exploring dashboards with Copilot. I need to reach out to the Apiiro teams to see if I can get an access token so that I can pull out a Power BI dashboard. I think Apiiro definitely has its own capabilities, but if there are access tokens that teams can use to build a custom dashboard, that would be great. This might already exist, but that is something which will ease the vulnerability management day-to-day activities.

I have been working with Apiiro since mid-last year, mid-2024 when I got my access, and I've been pulling out a list of all risks ever since.

I did not evaluate other options or other vendors before choosing Apiiro. It was provided to us by the application security team, stating that these are the tools that we can use, so it was prescribed to us, and I did not have an option to choose.

Apiiro is stable on weekends because nobody is using it, but during weekdays, it is too slow. If you are accessing your own project or repository, it's not slow, but for somebody in a central or horizontal role, it's painful to get to the reports on a weekday.

I think Apiiro is scalable. It was not the same last year when we looked at it. Apiiro has definitely stepped up this year and is open to customizations. That's why I rate it eight out of ten, although I'm very limited in my exposure.

I have not had to reach out to the technical support of Apiiro often. I have had some internal teams, and the last time I reached out to them for my access, they helped me with access to the superset of repositories. The team informed me that RBAC is yet to be implemented; beyond this, I haven't interacted with the support team.

Neutral

Apiiro provides similar functionality, but I think the interpretation and intelligence is something I would expect more from Apiiro. Last year, we were using Invicti, which used to give us some good recommendations.

I haven't explored Apiiro's advanced risk analysis features. I have not used the compliance monitoring feature of Apiiro so far. I am learning about Apiiro's AI-driven analytics for real-time feedback and risk scoring for reporting. I haven't used the automation capabilities of Apiiro.

I have not yet integrated Apiiro with other technical solutions. I started looking into the possibility of integrating inputs from Apiiro or other sources into a custom dashboard. Since I don't have a developer laptop, I'm trying to raise that. Last year, some teams indicated it was not very integration-friendly, but things have changed now. It is quite user-friendly in my view now.

Before Apiiro, we used to have an internal dashboard developed using Power BI, which pulled data from various sources, including Wiz, SonarQube, SonarLint, and Mend. We used to monitor secrets in code and critical vulnerabilities. They are upgrading, and we were referring to Apiiro recently. We still use an internal custom dashboard and some use Wiz. We also have Rapid7, and when I pull the reports from ServiceNow, it tells us what the top critical vulnerabilities reported by Rapid7 are, but I have no exposure to Rapid7 yet.

My overall rating for Apiiro is 7 out of 10.

We use Apiiro to detect secrets in our code, including SCA and SBOM generation. We recently used it to identify unused and public GitHub repositories, which we were able to clean up and remove code that should have been private.

We deployed Apiiro as SaaS.

The biggest benefit of Apiiro for us was the visibility it gave us into our GitHub organization, which we didn't have much of before.

The benefit of adding Apiiro early is that it would be integrated into our pipeline from the start. Since we have had some of our software products for many years, we would have to do a lot of cleaning up before integrating Apiiro into our developer workflow. Integrating Apiiro early allows us to stay ahead of the curve on security issues and address them as they arise, rather than having a huge backlog for developers to fix.

Apiiro's ability to provide visibility into the risk of our application components is great. This was a selling feature for us. Apiiro was a less mature product a little over a year ago when they were still early on in their development. However, they have made fantastic advancements over the last year, which has given us much more visibility into that sort of thing.

Apiiro has helped prevent business-critical risks by making recommendations based on what it thinks is a high or critical issue. I think it does a pretty good job at that, but those recommendations still need a manual review from us. In general, if Apiiro flags a critical issue, it is usually pretty close to identifying whether it is business-critical or not. It is something we should review, even if we end up downgrading it. Apiiro raises valid concerns, and I am happy that it does.

Apiiro's secrets detection feature has saved us several times, which we appreciate greatly. We also like the visibility aspect because it goes beyond visibility into code to include visibility into our developers' work and who needs more security training. Apiiro allows us to identify repeat offenders who introduce security issues, so we can provide them with additional training and support.

Apiiro recently integrated SaaS, and we would love to see them expand on that. They provide many integrations to different products, including SaaS products such as Snyk. Ideally, Apiiro would include SaaS from the get-go.

I would like support for our self-hosted Git server, other than GitHub, just regular Git. I understand that it's a legacy system and most people aren't using on-premises Git servers. We're probably gonna move away from it soon, and Apiiro is trying to accommodate us there.

I have been using Apiiro for over one year.

The stability has been very good. Early on, there was one instance when it was down for an hour or so, but it was not a big deal.

Apiiro is scalable, even for large customers. It's hard to say for certain, but we haven't had any issues with it. We probably have around a hundred or two hundred GitHub repositories, and we haven't had any performance issues or anything like that.

We have biweekly or monthly meetings with them, and we raise any questions or concerns we have at that time. I have never needed to contact Apiiro's technical support independently.

We are also in a Slack channel with Apiiro, where we can ping them if we have any questions, and they usually respond quickly.

Positive

We previously used Black Duck Hub to identify risky licenses, but that was essentially the only thing we used it for.

When we first started using Apiiro, it was not as mature as it is today. However, when we evaluate software vendors, we are not only evaluating the product but also the team behind it. We try to envision what the future might look like for the product and whether it has the potential to become great. If we can get in early on a product that shows promise, it can be beneficial for us both in terms of usability. We won't have to change tools in two years and pricing because we can get in at a good price early on.

The entire proof-of-concept process, sales process, and working with the Apiiro engineers were all very positive. I would like to emphasize that the team at Apiiro has been fantastic.

The deployment was straightforward. One person was required for the deployment.

The implementation was completed in-house with the help of an Apiiro tech.

We evaluated Snyk, Endor, and primarily GuardRails. We chose Apiiro because of its team. GuardRails was significantly more expensive then, and it was one of those situations where the price difference didn't make sense to me. Apiiro was already clearly on its way to providing everything that GuardRails had pitched us, it was better priced, and the team was outstanding. So, from a value perspective, Apiiro was a great choice at the beginning.

I would rate Apiiro ten out of ten. There are certain features we're asking for That Apiiro is working with us on. Generally, these are not super major things.

Apiiro is a mature solution.

Apiiro has added a lot of work because there were many things we didn't know about that we had to address. So, theoretically, it has increased our workload because our entire AppSec program was virtually nonexistent for a while. We weren't doing anything, but after implementing Apiiro, there is a lot more work. Therefore, I wouldn't say that it has reduced our manual workload.

We hired at least one person specifically to work with Apiiro. In that sense, it is additional work, but it is a good thing, and we somewhat anticipated it.

In the past year, we have requested features from Apiiro. One of them has been a bit of a back-and-forth process, but we have met with both of their founders, who have taken the time to meet with us and discuss how we can achieve our goals, even if it means getting what we need from Apiiro in a different way than we originally intended. They have been very engaged with us, and we feel that they treat us like any other customer, even though we are smaller.

No maintenance is required except for setting up our configurations.

My advice is to use Apiiro strategically. This means that we should not simply bring Apiiro into our environment, take all of its findings at once, and expect the development teams to fix them all within a couple of months. Instead, use Apiiro as a supporting tool for our AppSec strategy. I have seen many organizations bring on Apiiro or similar tools and then simply take all of the findings, create tickets for them, and assign them to developers. However, I believe that we need to be more strategic in how we integrate Apiiro into our culture and workflows.

I use the solution for source code analysis and to find vulnerabilities in source code to see where they might be exposed in the actual infrastructure.

Developers will now notice that one of their pull requests for their code has a vulnerability before it makes it into the main branch, and they'll be able to fix it themselves and realize that this is happening. it's provided us with a safeguard against having issues go into code.

The benefits of adding the solution early on in our AppSec strategy are great. That's what gives me the opportunity to automate a lot of the ticket-making and vulnerability finding and push it up towards the development teams. It's great for finding these vulnerabilities, however, due to the fact that we are not a fully mature program, we don't have many people onboard to focus on this. 

The automation is useful. It lets me bubble it up to the application teams while they're making changes and pull requests so that they'll see it. They'll realize that this code has vulnerabilities, and then they'll have to fix it for the pull request without me ever really looking at it myself - even though, technically, I could. Since I don't have much time, the automation lets me push a lot towards the developing team.

The workflow automation is likely the best aspect of the solution.

The solution's ability to provide visibility into our application components and risks is very good. It's helpful for finding all the components and risks that are available in the source code.

Apiiro has helped to reduce manual work associated with triaging alerts. It has saved at least ten hours per month.

It's helped me free up my time and gives me more time to work on other items that need to be worked on. I'm the only person on the IT team. 

The product is helping us prevent business-critical risks.

It's helped to reduce our mean time to remediate. This is very important to our organization. 

I've been pretty close to all of their new releases. We are on the beta program for a lot of their new features. We do a good job of testing and we learn whatever we can at the time. Since we're testing some of the new features for them, and walking through the product, we'll work with their chief product officer to see what's on the road map and what's coming down the line. It's been really nice and a good, two-way conversation.

That said, user management is a little bit clunky. It relies on contributors to source code. It's a little bit clunky, especially during the renewal process for our contract. Trying to figure out how many "seats" we had was very, very difficult due to the fact that it pulled those numbers dynamically from whoever was contributing to our GitHub repo. Therefore, having that be a little bit less clunky and not having to pull logs for who was actually contributing to the GitHub repo to find who is using licenses would be ideal. There's probably a much easier way to handle the users on the platform.

I've used the solution for a bit more than six months. 

The stability has gotten a lot better. We're in the AWS Marketplace and fully on the cloud. Their past self-posted solution lagged. Some things were not working, however, once we switched to AWS Marketplace, it's been very smooth. We've gotten a ton of beta updates and it's improved a lot compared to six months ago. 

I don't see any issues with scalability whatsoever. I'm not sure how they would do with a company that had five times our repositories to analyze.

Technical support is fantastic. Before we had a new account manager and a technical support person on Slack who was awesome. They helped a lot when we were re-establishing everything. 

Positive

I haven't used any other tools previously.

The solution was already in place when I arrived at the company. Nobody was really paying attention to it, however, so I revived it when I got to the company. I resynced and redeployed items. The whole process is very straightforward. 

The solution only requires some standard maintenance for SSO whenever that changes.

I did not use an integrator or consultant when I was re-setting up the solution. 

My understanding is the pricing is pretty competitive. 

I wasn't the one that implemented the solution. I inherited it. 

Our AppSec program is not yet mature in terms of people processes and tools.

I'd rate the solution seven out of ten. There are other tools that do similar things to the solution and yet do a lot more than Apiiro. They are not as specialized in source code analysis, however. 

I'd advise potential users that the solution definitely requires attention. While there is automation, it's not a silver bullet. You have to make sure you have the people in place to automate things, work the alerts, and set everything up correctly.