Control-M offers advanced scheduling and extensive integration options, ideal for complex enterprise needs. In comparison, Axway Automator is praised for its simplicity and ease of use. Control-M excels in feature set and customer service, while Axway is cost-effective with straightforward deployment.
AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.
IBM Workload Automation wins in ease of deployment and customer service. In comparison, Axway Automator boasts a robust feature set. IBM's strength lies in flexibility and integration, whereas Axway excels in event-driven processes and reporting tools, justifying its higher price.
To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA.
It is about one-third of the cost of a controller.
To my knowledge, IWA is the only WLA product that will provide "parallel tracking" capability to assist in upgrading from one platform to IWA.
It is about one-third of the cost of a controller.
Redwood RunMyJobs automates job scheduling for SAP, PeopleSoft, ERP, CRM, data warehousing, and Informatica. It enhances efficiency by replacing manual tasks with automated setups and integrates with multiple platforms. Users value error handling, alert generation, and robust cloud-based infrastructure but suggest improved reporting, AI capabilities, and better support.
