Top 10 Axway Automator Alternatives

Vendor: Axway

3.0 out of 5

1 review
0% willing to recommend

Top Axway Automator Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Axway Automator based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Control-M, AutoSys Workload Automation, and IBM Workload Automation. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Axway Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Axway, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

Control-M

4.4 out of 5

Control-M

4.4 out of 5

Control-M features comprehensive batch scheduling suitable for complex IT environments. In comparison, Axway Automator excels in supporting a wide range of business processes with enhanced scalability. Control-M's competitive pricing and straightforward deployment contrast with Axway's higher investment justified by advanced automation capabilities.

Pricing

Control-M involves a higher initial setup cost compared to Axway Automator, offering a more complex integration process. Conversely, Axway Automator presents a lower setup cost, ensuring a simpler and more straightforward deployment.

View comparison

Pricing

AutoSys Workload Automation

4.2 out of 5

AutoSys Workload Automation

4.2 out of 5

AutoSys Workload Automation is used by organizations for executing thousands of automations, managing server workloads, scheduling CP jobs, file transfers, enterprise batch scheduling, and ETL processing.

Pricing

AutoSys Workload Automation has higher setup costs but extensive customization options, whereas Axway Automator offers lower setup costs and quicker implementation.

View comparison

Pricing

AutoSys Workload Automation has higher setup costs but extensive customization options, whereas Axway Automator offers lower setup costs and quicker implementation.

IBM Workload Automation

4.0 out of 5

IBM Workload Automation

4.0 out of 5

IBM Workload Automation excels in scalability and integration, appealing to large enterprises. In comparison, Axway Automator attracts small to mid-sized businesses with ease of deployment and cost-effectiveness. Tech buyers choose based on specific needs—IBM for power, Axway for simplicity.

Pricing

IBM Workload Automation offers flexible setup costs, while Axway Automator provides a more predictable pricing structure.

View comparison

Pricing

IBM Workload Automation offers flexible setup costs, while Axway Automator provides a more predictable pricing structure.

Automic Automation

4.2 out of 5

Automic Automation

4.2 out of 5

Automic Automation excels in scalability and advanced integration for large enterprises, while Axway Automator offers simplicity and ease of use. In comparison, Axway Automator's cost-effective setup benefits mid-sized businesses seeking quick ROI. Automic Automation provides robust features suitable for complex enterprise needs.

Pricing

Automic Automation has a higher initial setup cost, while Axway Automator offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

View comparison

Pricing

Automic Automation has a higher initial setup cost, while Axway Automator offers a more budget-friendly setup option.

Redwood RunMyJobs

4.8 out of 5

Redwood RunMyJobs

4.8 out of 5

Redwood RunMyJobs automates job scheduling for SAP, PeopleSoft, ERP, CRM, data warehousing, and Informatica. It enhances efficiency by replacing manual tasks with automated setups and integrates with multiple platforms. Users value error handling, alert generation, and robust cloud-based infrastructure but suggest improved reporting, AI capabilities, and better support.

View comparison

Related categories

Workload Automation

Process Automation

Managed File Transfer (MFT)