Check Point plays a crucial role in enhancing our security firewall solution in our company. It has brought significant improvements, including features like spam and anti-spam measures, intrusion prevention (IPS), and advanced filtering.
Consultant, Reseller and IT Infrastructure Projects at Elytelec
Enhanced security with centralized control for threat prevention
Pros and Cons
- "It has brought significant improvements, including features like spam and anti-spam measures, intrusion prevention (IPS), and advanced filtering."
- "They could offer educational courses to help individuals improve their knowledge and skills."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature for me is the firewall. Whether it's five stars or even higher, the analytics reports it provides are truly impressive. They offer valuable Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) that shed light on various situations and different logs.
What needs improvement?
They could offer educational courses to help individuals improve their knowledge and skills.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with it for two years now.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Security Management
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Security Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It provides good stability features. I would rate it eight out of ten.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I would rate its scalability capabilities nine out of ten.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
In my previous company, I had experience using Fortinet and Palo Alto.
How was the initial setup?
I find that the setup process is somewhat distinct from other solutions. I believe that having some guidance from the website or tutorials would make it easier.
What other advice do I have?
I strongly recommend this solution because it's a highly effective and reliable choice. I would rate it nine out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Profesional Gestión Informática 2 - Especialista en Sistemas de Información at CompuGuana
Good antivirus services and a fast installation with centralized management
Pros and Cons
- "One of the most outstanding characteristics of its centralized administration is its great computing power."
- "I would like it to be the administrator of equipment or Next Generation firewalls (which have to be managed on this platform) and to be able to manage other services (like Harmony) that also belong to Check Point."
What is our primary use case?
We wanted a centralized administration console to allow us to manage more than one team inside or outside our organization. As a result of this need, we were looking for solutions that could complement us and provide effective and functional management of more than one team inside or outside the organization.
It was then that we came across and used Check Point, a solution that allows us to integrate and manage all these teams from one place. Check Point offered us not only a centralized administration, but it also offered us and gave us added value in different services and features that can be integrated into the centralized administration platform.
How has it helped my organization?
Check Point came to give additional value to us as administrators and our organization. It allowed us to integrate more than one characteristic service under the same administration platform, such as antivirus services, real-time emulation services, and real-time detection, characteristics that really give additional value in a centralized management console being a console and also a strategic ally in our organization. These characteristics tell us that it is not only a service to centralize the administration - it is also a service designed to implement and add value to the security of any company.
What is most valuable?
One of the most outstanding characteristics of its centralized administration is its great computing power. The ease of being able to integrate more than one computer and manage and orchestrate them simultaneously and individually creates security layers for each one of them or different approaches based on the needs of the branches. We have an installation that is fast with an execution that is simple. It is easy to manage what each organization needs.
What needs improvement?
I would like it to be the administrator of equipment or Next Generation firewalls (which have to be managed on this platform) and to be able to manage other services (like Harmony) that also belong to Check Point. We'd like to be able to manage them from the same platform. Although they are within the same portal right now, they are not managed in the same way nor are they from the same teams. It could be a very innovative future integration and will help to centralize this section while having the characteristics under the same management.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for about a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very stable lately. We've seen that the updates have made the solution apply changes faster and find it is more complete.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The platform has somewhat complex scalability. That said, it is still efficient - mainly when we have management or administration in what is known as HA or cluster.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Check Point Security Management
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Check Point Security Management. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
System Engineer Network & Security at a retailer with 10,001+ employees
Scalable with a good management API and visible audit logs
Pros and Cons
- "The management API is the best new feature for me. It allows us to further automate our customers' automated server ordering."
- "The management API can be further developed so that all functions offered by the dashboard are also available via the API (for example, Network Topology)."
What is our primary use case?
We primarily use the solution for the management of thousands of rules. partially automated via the well-documented API.
Managing the rules is a day-to-day business that takes a lot of time. It is really good that we can do the management through the dashboard. It is so comfortable, and, in contrast to other manufacturers, is structured much better. The integration of the logs allows a quick jump by mouse click between rules and log entry.
The API reduces the administrative effort so that we can concentrate on the essential things. in addition, it is an enormous advantage for our customers that rules are created automatically and are available immediately.
How has it helped my organization?
The transparency of the rules and the integrated logs makes daily troubleshooting easy and saves a lot of time.
Managing the rules is a day-to-day business that takes a lot of time. The dashboard is great and much better in contrast to other manufacturers.
The integration of the logs allows for a quick click between rules and log entry.
The immediately visible audit logs are also a great advantage. This allows changes to a rule to be tracked quickly and any errors to be corrected.
What is most valuable?
The management API is the best new feature for me. It allows us to further automate our customers' automated server ordering.
The API reduces the administrative effort so that we can concentrate on essential things. It is an enormous advantage for our customers that rules are created automatically and are available immediately.
For our private cloud, we have to stay competitive with the public clouds and the speed on offer is what counts here. It's good.
The new web management tool allows the management in the browser, which is a great feature.
What needs improvement?
The management API can be further developed so that all functions offered by the dashboard are also available via the API (for example, Network Topology).
The new web management tool which allows the management in the browser has to be developed further so that all functions from the dashboard are available. Many of our administrators work with a Mac OS. Until now, the management of rules is only possible on Windows as the Smart Dashboard is only available for Windows. Now, with the first release of the web interface, it is possible in the browser. All functions from the dashboard must still be possible via the web interface.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the R77.30 version since 2013.
We've upgraded to R80.10 in 2019. The update was a bit complicated, however, with the pre-check and some cleanup, it went without a problem
We upgraded the R80.10 to R 80.30 in 2020. The update management with the migration of export/import was a remote update and was easy.
We upgraded R80.30 to R80.81 in 2021. The management update was very easy and through the wizard, everything was very clear in terms of the individual steps. The update of the gateways took place at night.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We do not have any stability problems.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Check Point Maestro offers the industry a new way to leverage current hardware investments and maximizes appliance capacity. It's in an easy-to-manage hyper-scale network security solution in order to bring our networks and data centers into the world of hybrid clouds.
How are customer service and support?
The case handling is good. If you have experience and know what information the support needs, then the processing time can be minimized.
How would you rate customer service and support?
Neutral
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
In the past, we have used a Cisco ASA. Our management of the rules was not so good there. We also use FortiGate. This already offers a nice web interface, however, managing a large set of rules is almost impossible there.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was very simple. However, the migration of rules from other vendors was challenging.
What about the implementation team?
For large migrations, we always use a service provider or the manufacturer's team (Check Point Professional Services). Here we can fall back on well-trained SE's with a lot of experience.
What was our ROI?
No exact ROI has been calculated.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
All of our administrators have previously been on CCSA/CCSE training which provides good insights into the products. After various tests, we were able to carry out most of the setup ourselves in a developer environment. We were able to keep the costs for the migration low by using a lot of our own initiative. However, I would recommend the support of a Check Point certified partner.
Together with a Check Point partner (service provider), the requirements should be evaluated. Here, we were able to draw on the experience of our service provider and develop our environment according to our requirements.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We did not evaluate any other options.
What other advice do I have?
I can recommend the Check Point solution.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Infrastructure Service Specialist at a financial services firm with 10,001+ employees
Stable with good technical support and an intuitive interface
Pros and Cons
- "The intuitive interface also allows new team members to adapt to the technology if they are not familiar with it initially. It doesn't take much for one to familiarize themselves with the product."
- "Even though the platform is simple, and creating security policies is a fairly quick task, creating a bulk of policies at once (ie. for a migration) could be a useful tool. This is probably possible through scripting, however, having an easy-to-use "import CSV" button would be beneficial."
What is our primary use case?
I work for one of the biggest Australian banks that rely on Check Point firewalls for security enforcement across several points in the infrastructure environment.
The Security Management platform is a key component for our operation, in that it enables efficient central management for configuration and security troubleshooting. This centralised component facilitates and adds value to our daily operations, creating a single place for configurations and a platform that can present security logs that are used for the troubleshooting of security issues.
How has it helped my organization?
Check Point Security Management improved the speed at which security access permissions are granted across our environment through its centralized and easy-to-use nature. The possibility of re-using objects across different policies and also having the drag and drop capabilities are great.
Moreover, having one single platform managing multiple firewalls reduces the time (and cost) of the provisioning of infrastructure services. This boosts the productivity and efficiency of teams across the board.
What is most valuable?
The Check Point Security Management platform provides a central location for the management of domains and firewalls in the environment. The nature of the product brings valuable returns to the operation, increasing efficiency when configuring and troubleshooting.
The intuitive interface also allows new team members to adapt to the technology if they are not familiar with it initially. It doesn't take much for one to familiarize themselves with the product.
Another great feature is to have available logs in a central location, enabling the troubleshooting of security issues anywhere in the environment.
What needs improvement?
One possible improvement for the platform would be the import of security policies via CSV or CLI. Even though the platform is simple, and creating security policies is a fairly quick task, creating a bulk of policies at once (ie. for a migration) could be a useful tool. This is probably possible through scripting, however, having an easy-to-use "import CSV" button would be beneficial.
Another feature that could be improved is the export of configurations to CSV. This is often useful to map current firewall policies or NATs. I understand that this feature is available currently, but would CSV bring objects with names (but not IPs) and groups (but not the members). The improvement of this feature would surely be welcomed.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Check Point Security Management for around 4 years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The most recent software versions are very stable and trouble-free.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have a very good impression of it so far. The possibility of adding firewalls to the fleet and keep a central management point makes it simple to grow the operation.
How are customer service and technical support?
The experience with the Check Point Professional Services team, and TAC, couldn't be better. The team that works with my organization is extremely knowledgeable and is always willing to go the extra mile in order to find the best possible solution for any kind of goal we need to achieve. The TAC team is also always helpful and provides us with many valuable inputs in hard times.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I have used different solutions from other vendors, but not on the exact same places. The Check Point Security Management platform was mostly used alongside others.
How was the initial setup?
Perhaps because I lack experience setting it up from scratch, the initial setup seemed quite complex.
What about the implementation team?
We had a vendor team assist with the setup.
What was our ROI?
Overall, the ROI is great. It is a solid and easy-to-use platform that adds a huge value that justifies every penny.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I most definitely recommend this platform when it comes to cost. The available list of add-ons creates great flexibility to the technology and is also easy on the budget - since you only pay for the features you use.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
This is not applicable to my role.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Security Engineer at DeliverICT
Centralized management, intuitive user interface, and comprehensive security features
Pros and Cons
- "Check Point Security Management Server offers a wide range of security features, including firewall, intrusion prevention, VPN, application control, and threat prevention capabilities."
- "It also offers compatibility with third-party security solutions, however, it is not a lot. This needs to be improved."
What is our primary use case?
Check Point Security Management Server is a comprehensive solution designed to streamline and centralize the management of security policies across an organization's network infrastructure.
One of the standout features of the Check Point Security Management Server is its ability to manage security policies across multiple Check Point security gateways centrally. This centralized approach simplifies policy deployment, monitoring, and updates, making it easier for administrators to maintain a consistent security posture.
How has it helped my organization?
The Check Point Security Management Server has the ability to centrally manage security policies across multiple Check Point security gateways. This centralized approach simplifies policy deployment, monitoring, and updates, making it easier for administrators to maintain a consistent security posture.
It offers high-performance capabilities to handle large volumes of traffic while maintaining low latency, ensuring minimal impact on network performance. This product greatly improved our company customers and allowed us to implement the solution easily.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable aspects of the solution are:
1. Centralized Management: It can centrally manage security policies across multiple Check Point security gateways. This centralized approach simplifies policy deployment, monitoring, and updates, making it easier for administrators to maintain a consistent security posture.
2. Intuitive User Interface: The management console provides an intuitive user interface that allows administrators to configure and monitor security policies with ease. The interface is well-designed, with clear navigation and comprehensive options for managing security rules, network objects, and logs.
3. Comprehensive Security Features: Check Point Security Management Server offers a wide range of security features, including firewall, intrusion prevention, VPN, application control, and threat prevention capabilities. These features work together to provide multi-layered protection against various cyber threats.
What needs improvement?
Check Point Security Management Server integrates seamlessly with other Check Point security products, providing a cohesive security ecosystem for organizations. It also offers compatibility with third-party security solutions, however, it is not a lot. This needs to be improved.
Check Point offers comprehensive product support and documentation, including online resources, knowledge bases, and technical support services. This ensures that administrators have access to the assistance they need to deploy and maintain the Security Management Server effectively, but when customers raise issues, the support is not satisfactory and timely.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used the solution for more than one and a half years.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: My company resell's and implement this product means it's a partner of checkpoint.
Last updated: Mar 11, 2024
Flag as inappropriateSenior Infrastructure Services Specialist at St.George Bank Limited
Great for security monitoring with easy central management and good scalability
Pros and Cons
- "It has a central management log server that helps us to easily identify faults and issues in the environment, especially during outages and incidents during the implementation of policy rules."
- "It would be great if the SmartView Monitor could become integrated into the SmartView Console Platform."
What is our primary use case?
As part of the Bank's Network Security Infrastructure team, it is our responsibility to manage different security products and devices that lay the foundation of the Bank's Security Infrastructure Network. Part of that responsibility also includes the implementation and policy update requests arising from different business and support teams to make sure that application services comply with the security standards to protect all services of the bank and maintain the reliability of the services across an environment.
With a centralized Check Point Security Management solution, it makes it easier for our day-to-day operations to manage all Security Gateway Firewalls across the bank.
How has it helped my organization?
The Check Point Security Management has improved the management of all our Security Check Point Gateway Firewalls across the bank.
With Security Management we are able to simplify our response and support for all our security network devices, which, compared to other products that need to be managed individually, the Check Point solution is far better and less daunting.
The Security Management also includes the management of logs far that are more efficient, as it provides all the needed information required to investigate and understand how the gateways are accepting or blocking traffic.
What is most valuable?
The Main Domain Log Management Server is what I find to be the most valuable feature for the Security Management of our environment. With the Main Domain Log Management Server, support teams are able to check and verify the information required to determine if any traffic is getting blocked or denied due to specific policy rule implementation. It can even identify any traffic getting spoofed or any other related events on the gateways. It has a central management log server that helps us to easily identify faults and issues in the environment, especially during outages and incidents during the implementation of policy rules.
What needs improvement?
It would be great if the SmartView Monitor could become integrated into the SmartView Console Platform. As it stands, it will still open the old R77 SmartView monitor session, which is a bit flaky and slow. If the SmartView monitor could be integrated into the R80.40 and R81 versions, that would be great. It would help us in unpacking the trends and graphs and see how traffic is observed when hitting the different Check Point Firewall Gateways that the Security Management controls. It will help support teams to identify capacity limitations and have oversight into what's happening in the environment at any given point in time.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for one year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is very stable and manageable as there's a centralized management server that takes care of the rest of the Check Point Gateways across our infrastructure.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is very scalable since you can increase the number of gateways in your infrastructure and still manage them in just one centralized SmartView Console.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support team is very knowledgeable and supportive of all our issues and incidents in the bank. Their expertise and reliability are what bring the products of Check Point under complete lifecycle support, which aims to maintain our infrastructure reliability and stability.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
At the moment, we have a co-existing infrastructure with other security network devices, and we can definitely see the benefit of having the Check Point Security Management application in our infrastructure.
How was the initial setup?
The setup and operational management of Security Management is very easy. This helps us to train people quickly in terms of managing our bank infrastructure in order to maintain reliability and stability in the network.
What about the implementation team?
We have a professional service provider that implements the solution and he is very knowledgeable in terms of his expertise of the product. I would rate our professional service provider to be a 9 out of 10.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I would advise others that it's definitely a great investment to have. It's great to have Security Management across your infrastructure.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have other options with other vendors such as Juniper, with their Security Director, and JSpace, but nothing can compare with how Check Point Security Management performs.
What other advice do I have?
If you have a manageable security infrastructure, the cost, pricing, or licensing will be far outweighed by the reliability and stability. It's great in terms of what a properly managed environment can bring.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Senior Infrastructure Services Specialist at St.George Bank Limited
Easy to set up with great support and good central management
Pros and Cons
- "The solution is ideal for use and deployment in a large infrastructure environment."
- "If the SmartView monitor can be integrated in the R80.40 and R81 versions, that would be ideal in understanding the trends and graphs of how traffic is observed hitting the different Check Point Firewall Gateways that the Security Management controls."
What is our primary use case?
As part of the Bank's Network Security Infrastructure team, it is our responsibility to manage different security products and devices that lay the foundation of the Bank's Security infrastructure network. Part of that responsibility also includes the implementation and policy update request arising from different business and support teams to make sure that application services comply with the security standards to protect all services of the bank and maintain reliability of the services across environment.
With a centralized Check Point Security Management solution, it makes it easier for our day-to-day operations to manage all Security Gateway Firewalls across the bank.
How has it helped my organization?
The Check Point Security Management has improved the management of all our Security Check Point Gateway Firewalls across the bank.
With Security Management we are able to simplify our response and support for all our security network devices, which, compared to other products that need to be managed individually, the Check Point solution is far better and less daunting.
The Security Management also includes the management of logs that is far more efficient, as it provides all the needed information required to investigate and understand how the gateways are accepting or blocking traffic from the gateways.
What is most valuable?
The Main Domain Log Management Server is what I find to be the most valuable feature for the Security Management of our environment.
With the Main Domain Log Management Server, support teams are able to check and verify the information required in order to determine if any traffic is getting blocked or denied due to specific policy rule implementation, or even identify any traffic getting spoof or any other related events on the gateways.
It has a central management log server that helps us to easily identify faults and issues in the environment, especially during outages and incidents during the implementation of policy rules.
What needs improvement?
It would be great if the SmartView Monitor could become integrated into the SmartView Console Platform. As it stands, performing a smart view monitor will still open the old R77 SmartView monitor session, which is a bit flaky and slow. If the SmartView monitor can be integrated in the R80.40 and R81 versions, that would be ideal in understanding the trends and graphs of how traffic is observed hitting the different Check Point Firewall Gateways that the Security Management controls. It will also help support teams to identify capacity limitations and have a foresight of what's happening in the environment at any given point in time.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using the solution for 4 Years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The solution is ideal for use and deployment in a large infrastructure environment.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The solution is very efficient. You can add more gateways in the environment and manage on the same management server as it has a centralized design.
How are customer service and technical support?
We have diamond support and they are very helpful and detailed during explanations for any issues we are facing. The diamond support that we get definitely provides full life cycle support. It brings reliability to the product when you have great support from Check Point.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
At the moment, we have a co-existing infrastructure with other security network devices, and we can definitely see the benefit of having the Check Point Security Management application in our infrastructure.
How was the initial setup?
The setup was straightforward as the SmartConsole associated with the Security Management is GUI-friendly and anyone can easily access and manage it.
What about the implementation team?
One of the Professional Service members we work with is very attentive to detail and ready to support our team during difficult times - including the implementation and consultation of the Check Point Products. The professional service on offer is really great as you do not often get someone from a vendor that knows the inside and out of the product dedicated to your own infrastructure.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I would advise others that it's definitely a great investment to have Security Management across your infrastructure.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We have other options with other vendors such as Juniper, with their Security Director, and JSpace, but nothing can compare with how the Check Point Security Management performs.
What other advice do I have?
If you have a manageable security infrastructure, the cost, pricing, or licensing will be far outweighed by the reliability and stability of how a properly managed environment is.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Perimeter Security Administrator at a security firm with 51-200 employees
It gives us complete visibility into our security operations, allowing administrators to identify and address problem areas, reduce unnecessary costs, and improve efficiency
Pros and Cons
- "Security Management gives us complete visibility into our security operations, allowing administrators to identify and address problem areas, reduce unnecessary costs, and improve efficiency. It offers detailed reports on network usage and security, which helps my company to monitor and control its security expenses."
- "Check Point's hybrid cloud integration needs significant improvements. These resources need to evolve as data transfers to the cloud increase, so hybrid cloud models are easier to implement. Better hybrid cloud integration would improve how we manage our security logs and provide our administrators with a low-cost solution that enables them to meet all our essential requirements."
What is our primary use case?
We needed a solution that had the things required to keep the company secure, like confidentiality, centralization, and a range of technological services.
There weren't many other leading solutions that allowed us to achieve our goal of centralizing most security resources in one place to achieve rapid, unified management and control of our assets, achieve our annual goals, and provide the best service.
How has it helped my organization?
Security Management gives us complete visibility into our security operations, allowing administrators to identify and address problem areas, reduce unnecessary costs, and improve efficiency.
It offers detailed reports on network usage and security, which helps my company to monitor and control its security expenses.
What is most valuable?
Many excellent solutions can be plugged into Security Management to help us prevent threats and manage network security, such as the firewall. The firewall is one of the most powerful because it enables us to guard against attacks and threats on our perimeter in real-time and centrally manage everything to maintain a robust security posture.
What needs improvement?
Check Point's hybrid cloud integration needs significant improvements. These resources need to evolve as data transfers to the cloud increase, so hybrid cloud models are easier to implement. Better hybrid cloud integration would improve how we manage our security logs and provide our administrators with a low-cost solution that enables them to meet all our essential requirements.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used Securit Management for a year.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Check Point Security Management is highly scalable. It can adapt to the changing needs of your business, allowing your business to maintain a set spend without going over it annually.
What other advice do I have?
I rate Check Point Security Management eight out of 10.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
Hybrid Cloud
If public cloud, private cloud, or hybrid cloud, which cloud provider do you use?
Other
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point Security Management Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Popular Comparisons
Splunk Enterprise Security
IBM Security QRadar
Elastic Security
LogRhythm SIEM
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
USM Anywhere
VMware Aria Operations for Logs
ManageEngine EventLog Analyzer
ArcSight Logger
Nagios Log Server
Splunk Cloud Platform
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Check Point Security Management Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Log Management tools and software, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
- Which Windows event log monitoring tool do you recommend?
- What is the difference between log management and SIEM?
- Splunk vs. Elastic Stack
- How can Cloudtrail logs be used effectively to improve log monitoring?
- Why hot data and cold data differences in SIEM solutions are not discussed sufficiently?
- When evaluating Log Management solutions, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- When evaluating Log Management solutions, what aspects do you think are the most important to look for?
- Why are Log Management tools important for companies?