Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Elastic Security comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point Security Management support is mixed; some users praise it while others report slow resolutions and unhelpful agents.
Sentiment score
6.3
Elastic Security's community support is praised, but technical support experiences vary, with mixed reviews on responsiveness and service quality.
We have partner support that helps us mitigate vulnerabilities reported by our infrastructure team.
Providing necessary assistance efficiently.
 

Room For Improvement

Sentiment score
5.4
Check Point Security Management needs speed, stability, better integration, intuitive usability, cost efficiency, enhanced reporting, and improved hybrid cloud management.
Sentiment score
4.2
Elastic Security needs better authentication, user interface, AI features, documentation, integrations, marketing, and improved scalability for user satisfaction.
CrowdStrike and Defender have more established threat intelligence integration due to having a larger client base.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Security Management offers robust scalability and flexibility, but complex environments may require careful planning for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
7.3
Elastic Security scales well across environments, needing planning but suiting diverse business sizes and cloud infrastructure scalability.
 

Setup Cost

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point Security Management is costly but valuable, offering robust features and flexibility with potential discounts for extensive use.
Sentiment score
6.9
Elastic Security is cost-effective with open-source options, offering flexible plans but may incur costs for advanced features.
Since we are using it extensively, we get significant discounts during procurement.
The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building their security infrastructure.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Security Management is stable and reliable, with some performance issues under heavy loads and occasional bugs.
Sentiment score
7.6
Elastic Security is reliable and stable, with configuration-dependent performance; careful planning ensures stability despite occasional upgrade issues.
In terms of stability, I would rate Elastic a solid eight out of ten.
 

Valuable Features

Sentiment score
8.2
Check Point Security Management provides centralized policy management, advanced features for threat prevention, and efficient gateway management for enhanced security.
Sentiment score
8.1
Elastic Security offers rapid searching, scalability, visualization, machine learning, and seamless integration, making it user-friendly and cost-effective.
It's already helped secure our organization effectively.
Elastic Security offers good insight regarding alerts, reports, and cases.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Ranking in Log Management
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (14th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (5th)
Elastic Security
Ranking in Log Management
5th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.7
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (5th), Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR) (16th), Security Orchestration Automation and Response (SOAR) (6th), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (8th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 0.4%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Elastic Security is 4.8%, down from 7.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer06814135 - PeerSpot reviewer
Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation
We didn't find any major feature missing or lacking in Check Point products that we used. We'd just like them to continue to improve their products with new features and updates. We'd like to see more and more integration possibilities between Checkpoint and other vendor security solutions such as Malwarebytes, SIEM solution providers, and standalone vulnerability scanners. The Check Point SandBlast platform could also be merged with the Check Point GAIA platform for a central management console and easier controls.
Gajewski Marek - PeerSpot reviewer
Provides good anomaly detection and connectivity reporting
We previously used Splunk but switched to Elastic Security because Splunk was more expensive. Feature-wise, both tools are pretty much the same. They have almost the same functions. Elastic Security has a much better AI assistant that allows you to ask questions like a normal person. With Elastic Security, I can also predict the price and how much it will cost. Splunks's pricing depends on how much data we use and the different add-ons I have to add. The pricing is much better with Elastic Security.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
12%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
9%
Security Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
17%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Government
10%
University
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
We are not sure if there is a centralized security console available. It would be beneficial if all firewalls could be integrated under one management console.
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
We work with multiple security tools, including network security and information security solutions. Our primary use case includes using Check Point and other tools like CyberArk for privilege acce...
Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...
What do you like most about Elastic Security?
Elastic provides the capability to index quickly due to the reverse indexes it offers. This data is crucial as it contains critical information. The reverse index allows fast data indexing because ...
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Elastic Security?
Elastic Security is cost-effective compared to Defender and CrowdStrike. The pricing is reasonable, especially for Small Medium Enterprises (SMEs), making it a viable option for businesses building...
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
Elastic SIEM, ELK Logstash
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
Texas A&M, U.S. Air Force, NuScale Power, Martin's Point Health Care
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Elastic Security and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
823,875 professionals have used our research since 2012.