Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Fortinet FortiAnalyzer comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 12, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Check Point Security Management delivers up to 65% ROI by reducing incidents and improving security efficiency and data safety.
Sentiment score
7.2
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers a good ROI, enhancing network visibility and security, especially in complex environments, despite resource impacts.
The impact of the tool is low when the functionalities are inaccessible due to resource consumption.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point Security Management support is mixed; some users praise it while others report slow resolutions and unhelpful agents.
Sentiment score
8.1
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer customer support is generally positive but has mixed feedback on efficiency and communication.
We have partner support that helps us mitigate vulnerabilities reported by our infrastructure team.
Customer service and support for Fortinet FortiAnalyzer are quite helpful and responsive.
Sometimes, I need to consult FortinetDocs to understand integration.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Security Management offers robust scalability and flexibility, but complex environments may require careful planning for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
7.7
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is scalable with proper sizing, but hardware versions may require extra licenses for smooth scaling.
FortiAnalyzer is a scalable product.
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is scalable, especially for the VM versions, as additional space can be provisioned from the servers as needed.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Security Management is stable and reliable, with some performance issues under heavy loads and occasional bugs.
Sentiment score
8.5
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is highly stable and reliable, though some issues with OS versions and CPU usage may occur.
We faced some CPU consumption issues, which caused the machine to slow down and required a restart of FortiAnalyzer.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Security Management needs speed, stability, better integration, intuitive usability, cost efficiency, enhanced reporting, and improved hybrid cloud management.
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer requires improvements in user interface, integration, cloud capabilities, performance, and technical support for enhanced user experience.
When licensing, each device is licensed separately, such as the firewall, which can become expensive.
One area for improvement could be better support for third-party products.
A possible improvement for FortiAnalyzer could be in threat intelligence.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Security Management is costly but valuable, offering robust features and flexibility with potential discounts for extensive use.
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is seen as costly for small businesses, though it offers competitive value against Palo Alto and Cisco.
Since we are using it extensively, we get significant discounts during procurement.
In terms of pricing, FortiAnalyzer is not expensive.
I can't calculate costs per user.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Security Management provides centralized policy management, advanced features for threat prevention, and efficient gateway management for enhanced security.
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer offers centralized log analysis, customizable reporting, and integration with Fortinet devices for enhanced security and network management.
It's already helped secure our organization effectively.
The advanced analytics capabilities aid in threat detection by providing visibility into indicators of compromise.
The system provides valuable insights through information, graphics, and reports.
It's a very flexible and rich tool, providing custom reports along with default reports.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Ranking in Log Management
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (5th)
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
Ranking in Log Management
8th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
93
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 0.4%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is 2.4%, down from 3.5% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ozan Durmus - PeerSpot reviewer
Good documentation and proxy support with a helpful community available for troubleshooting
It's useful that we can find unused objects. This helps us to get rid of unused objects in our database, Proxy support is valuable for us. We can apply centralized proxy settings to get additional databases when we need them. Revision history and detailed audit log is a good feature with this we can always feeling safe if somethings go wrong, I'm sure that I can go back the old one. Smart Event is a very good feature. It provides a graphical view of the traffics and provides history. The filter syntax is very good and helps control when we need it.
Boaz Katabazi - PeerSpot reviewer
Enables flexible and comprehensive reporting across all syslog-enabled devices
I mainly use it for reporting. It also integrates other security solutions around. It can report onto anything that has a syslog on the network. It doesn't have to be a Fortinet product. It integrates within FortiGate and you can find the reports there. It's a very flexible and rich tool, providing custom reports along with default reports.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
University
6%
Computer Software Company
18%
Government
8%
Financial Services Firm
7%
Manufacturing Company
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
We are not sure if there is a centralized security console available. It would be beneficial if all firewalls could be integrated under one management console.
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
We work with multiple security tools, including network security and information security solutions. Our primary use case includes using Check Point and other tools like CyberArk for privilege acce...
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiAnalyzer?
The reporting features, which offer customization, real-time insights, and compliance support, are particularly noteworthy aspects.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Fortinet FortiAnalyzer?
I am a technical engineer, so I am not privy to pricing details.
What needs improvement with Fortinet FortiAnalyzer?
Sometimes, there is a problem with CPU consumption, where one process consumes 100%, and I need to restart FortiAnalyzer to fix this. I am not familiar with the processes of scalability.
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
General Directorate of Information Technology
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Fortinet FortiAnalyzer and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.