Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Wazuh comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 8, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Ranking in Log Management
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Number of Reviews
61
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (14th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (4th)
Wazuh
Ranking in Log Management
2nd
Average Rating
7.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
44
Ranking in other categories
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) (3rd), Extended Detection and Response (XDR) (4th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of November 2024, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 0.5%, down from 0.8% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Wazuh is 17.1%, up from 13.0% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

reviewer06814135 - PeerSpot reviewer
Oct 12, 2023
Great DDoS protection, high availability, and useful firewall rule implementation
We use the product as a primary gateway firewall for all offices at different locations.  We have deployed their high-end firewall UTMs to medium business grade devices 1400 series. They are easy to manage either centrally or as separate devices. We are using them for Network security including…
Vikrant Puranik - PeerSpot reviewer
Aug 1, 2022
It integrates seamlessly with AWS cloud-native services
I worked with Splunk, Curator, ArcSight, and some legacy solutions that no longer exist. They became obsolete or transitioned to a different product. Cost-effectiveness was one reason we switched. We had to decide whether to spend $500,000 on a commercial product or rely on our skills to deploy an open-source solution. The big difference between Wazuh and other solutions is maturity and customization. Wazuh's scalability and out-of-the-box functionality are slightly lagging behind, but Wazuh has improved a lot since the first time we saw it. Others have more search capabilities, whereas Wazuh depends on Elasticsearch. Searching is a bit slower in Wazuh.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"The solution is easy to use and comes with few vulnerabilities. You don't have to worry about release upgrades. Life cycle management is very easy."
"The Check Point Management server is isolated from security gateways, which means that in case there is an issue, we have our configuration ready and we can directly replace the device and push the configuration."
"The control is granular, so you can set policy profiles for different organizational profiles."
"The layered architecture is really understandable and easy to use."
"The interface also makes it easy for us to configure the VPN from the GUI rather than the command line, which makes it easy even for less experienced engineers to work with."
"The unique management using Smart Console for all firewalls is very useful."
"The compliance is great."
"We are now able to monitor the different VPN communities in real-time."
"Wazuh's most beneficial features for our security needs are flexibility, built-in rules, integration capabilities, and documentation."
"We found the MITRE framework mapping and the agent enrollment service to be the most valuable features of Wazuh."
"Wazuh is free and easy to use. It is also adjustable, and we can use it on the cloud and on-premises."
"Good for monitoring, active response, and for vulnerabilities."
"The product's initial setup phase was easy."
"Some of the strengths of Wazuh that stand out for us include its scalability when deployed on Azure, its open-source nature, which allows for customization based on our needs, and its compatibility with various security solutions like threat intelligence platforms."
"It's very easy to integrate Wazuh with other environments, cloud applications, and on-prem applications. So, the advantage is that it's easy to implement and integrate with other solutions."
"Its cost-effectiveness is the most valuable aspect."
 

Cons

"In my experience, the place they can improve the most is in the technical support where I have had some serious problems that could not be solved in time due to a lack of knowledge of the assigned engineer."
"I would like for users to have more control over the platform in the next release. Right now, the system is very central and general requiring new rules to be created that better-suite our requirements."
"We'd like to see more and more integration possibilities between Checkpoint and other vendor security solutions such as Malwarebytes, SIEM solution providers, and standalone vulnerability scanners."
"I would like to bind users to their network, as well as their local office machine."
"The graphical interface is nice but it is a bit heavy."
"Check Point's hybrid cloud integration needs significant improvements. These resources need to evolve as data transfers to the cloud increase, so hybrid cloud models are easier to implement. Better hybrid cloud integration would improve how we manage our security logs and provide our administrators with a low-cost solution that enables them to meet all our essential requirements."
"It would be great if the SmartView Monitor could become integrated into the SmartView Console Platform."
"For those not familiar with the Command Line interface, there should be an option in the GUI for operating backups."
"Its user interface for sure can be improved. It is not so comfortable to use if you're looking for specific logs."
"So far, the recent updates have addressed most challenges we previously faced."
"Wazuh doesn't have native support for some enterprise solutions."
"The only challenge we faced with Wazuh was the lack of direct support."
"Adding the flexibility to integrate various plug-ins or modules into its core system would enhance functionality."
"Wazuh should come up with more in-built rules and integrations for the cloud."
"The support channel is not optimal, and extensive research is required on our part to implement Wazuh effectively."
"Wazuh has a drawback with regard to Unix systems. The solution does not allow us to do real-time monitoring for Unix systems. If usage increases, it would be a heavy fall on the other SIEM solutions or event monitoring solutions."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one will be very expensive, and ten means low price, I rate the tool's price as a three out of ten."
"The solution is expensive."
"The solution is expensive and there is an annual license."
"The pricing can be estimated around 3 or 4 out of 10 in terms of expense."
"Price-wise, it is an expensive solution."
"Check Point is much cheaper than the competition ($4/server as compared to $17/server)."
"This product can be used for 25 security gateways on a basic license."
"Do the homework because Check Point is rather expensive."
"When I contacted customer care, they mentioned bundling options, that I found to be overall affordable."
"Wazuh is totally free and open source. There are no licensing costs, only support costs if you need them."
"The solution's cost is above the average."
"The solution's pricing is very competitive."
"We use the free version of Wazuh."
"It is an open-source product."
"Wazuh is a cheaply priced product."
"It is a free-of-cost solution."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
13%
Financial Services Firm
11%
Government
8%
Security Firm
8%
Computer Software Company
16%
University
7%
Government
7%
Comms Service Provider
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
To make the tool better, I think we could have some sort of analysis similar to how some products offer information related to social media sentiments. If we could get that kind of assessment, some...
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
We use the solution for VPN with multifactor authentication, IPS protection, and threat emulation. We have deployed the product in the cloud data center.
What do you like most about Wazuh?
Integrates with various open-source and paid products, allowing for flexibility in customization based on use cases.
What needs improvement with Wazuh?
The latest version, 4.9, has improved the interface significantly. I am yet to explore more about the update to identify further areas for improvement. So far, the recent updates have addressed mos...
What is your primary use case for Wazuh?
We use Wazuh for our Security Information and Event Management (SIEM) needs. It serves as a log aggregator and provides us the capability to monitor our servers for brute force attacks and other se...
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Wazuh and other solutions. Updated: October 2024.
815,854 professionals have used our research since 2012.