Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Check Point Security Management vs Datadog comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 5, 2025

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.1
Check Point Security Management delivers up to 65% ROI by reducing incidents and improving security efficiency and data safety.
Sentiment score
7.2
Datadog optimizes costs, boosts efficiency, enhances debugging, saves time, and outperforms alternatives despite challenges in quantifying returns.
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
6.8
Check Point Security Management support is mixed; some users praise it while others report slow resolutions and unhelpful agents.
Sentiment score
7.3
Datadog's customer service is generally praised for responsiveness and expertise, though some users note delays and lack of phone support.
We have partner support that helps us mitigate vulnerabilities reported by our infrastructure team.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Security Management offers robust scalability and flexibility, but complex environments may require careful planning for optimal performance.
Sentiment score
7.6
Datadog offers scalable performance and customization but users should monitor rising costs and potential challenges with complex architectures.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.1
Check Point Security Management is stable and reliable, with some performance issues under heavy loads and occasional bugs.
Sentiment score
8.0
Datadog is praised for its stability and reliable performance, effectively managing disruptions and supporting diverse operational needs.
 

Room For Improvement

Check Point Security Management needs speed, stability, better integration, intuitive usability, cost efficiency, enhanced reporting, and improved hybrid cloud management.
Datadog users face challenges with billing, integration, interface complexity, and desire more flexibility, support, and improved features.
 

Setup Cost

Check Point Security Management is costly but valuable, offering robust features and flexibility with potential discounts for extensive use.
Datadog's pricing varies by organization size, requiring careful monitoring and planning due to complex usage-based billing and potential hidden costs.
Since we are using it extensively, we get significant discounts during procurement.
 

Valuable Features

Check Point Security Management provides centralized policy management, advanced features for threat prevention, and efficient gateway management for enhanced security.
Datadog excels in real-time monitoring, intuitive interface, robust integrations, efficient alerts, and comprehensive performance tracking and system reliability.
It's already helped secure our organization effectively.
 

Categories and Ranking

Check Point Security Manage...
Ranking in Log Management
9th
Average Rating
8.8
Reviews Sentiment
7.3
Number of Reviews
62
Ranking in other categories
Advanced Threat Protection (ATP) (13th), Threat Intelligence Platforms (5th)
Datadog
Ranking in Log Management
3rd
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
186
Ranking in other categories
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability (1st), Network Monitoring Software (3rd), IT Infrastructure Monitoring (2nd), Container Monitoring (2nd), Cloud Monitoring Software (1st), AIOps (1st), Cloud Security Posture Management (CSPM) (9th)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the Log Management category, the mindshare of Check Point Security Management is 0.4%, down from 0.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Datadog is 5.9%, down from 8.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Log Management
 

Featured Reviews

Ozan Durmus - PeerSpot reviewer
Good documentation and proxy support with a helpful community available for troubleshooting
It's useful that we can find unused objects. This helps us to get rid of unused objects in our database, Proxy support is valuable for us. We can apply centralized proxy settings to get additional databases when we need them. Revision history and detailed audit log is a good feature with this we can always feeling safe if somethings go wrong, I'm sure that I can go back the old one. Smart Event is a very good feature. It provides a graphical view of the traffics and provides history. The filter syntax is very good and helps control when we need it.
Kevin Palmer - PeerSpot reviewer
Useful log aggregation and management with helpful metrics aggregation
Datadog provides us value in three major ways: First, Datadog provides best-in-class functionality in many, if not all, of the products to which we subscribe (infrastructure, APM, log management, serverless, synthetics, real user monitoring, DB monitoring). In my experience with other tools that provide similar functionality, Datadog provides the largest feature set with the most flexibility and the best performance. Second, Datadog allows us to access all of those services in one place. Having to learn and manage only one tool for all of those purposes is a major benefit. Third, Datadog provides significant connectivity between those services so that we can view, summarize, organize, translate and correlate our data with maximum effect. Not needing to manually integrate them to draw lines between those pieces of information is a huge time savings for us.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Log Management solutions are best for your needs.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
14%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
University
6%
Educational Organization
39%
Computer Software Company
10%
Financial Services Firm
10%
Manufacturing Company
5%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Check Point Security Management?
The most beneficial features for us are the alert classifications, which help us prioritize critical issues, and the detailed reports that provide insights into attack origins and purposes, such as...
What needs improvement with Check Point Security Management?
We are not sure if there is a centralized security console available. It would be beneficial if all firewalls could be integrated under one management console.
What is your primary use case for Check Point Security Management?
We work with multiple security tools, including network security and information security solutions. Our primary use case includes using Check Point and other tools like CyberArk for privilege acce...
Any advice about APM solutions?
There are many factors and we know little about your requirements (size of org, technology stack, management systems, the scope of implementation). Our goal was to consolidate APM and infra monitor...
Datadog vs ELK: which one is good in terms of performance, cost and efficiency?
With Datadog, we have near-live visibility across our entire platform. We have seen APM metrics impacted several times lately using the dashboards we have created with Datadog; they are very good c...
Which would you choose - Datadog or Dynatrace?
Our organization ran comparison tests to determine whether the Datadog or Dynatrace network monitoring software was the better fit for us. We decided to go with Dynatrace. Dynatrace offers network ...
 

Also Known As

R80.10, R80, R77.30, R77, Check Point R80.10 Security Management, R80 Security Management
No data available
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

Hedgetec, Geiger
Adobe, Samsung, facebook, HP Cloud Services, Electronic Arts, salesforce, Stanford University, CiTRIX, Chef, zendesk, Hearst Magazines, Spotify, mercardo libre, Slashdot, Ziff Davis, PBS, MLS, The Motley Fool, Politico, Barneby's
Find out what your peers are saying about Check Point Security Management vs. Datadog and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,020 professionals have used our research since 2012.