Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Datadog Logo

Top 10 Datadog Alternatives

Vendor: Datadog
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
2,782 followers
Start review

Top Datadog Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Datadog based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Zabbix, New Relic, and Azure Monitor. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. Datadog surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive monitoring and security features, real-time cloud integration, and user-friendly dashboards, delivering unparalleled visibility across infrastructure, applications, and logs to enhance performance and reliability.

Datadog Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Datadog, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Datadog Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Zabbix
4.2 out of 5
Zabbix offers cost-effective open-source monitoring, suiting companies seeking scalability and automation without licensing fees. In comparison, Datadog provides real-time visibility and seamless integrations, appealing to buyers prioritizing user-friendly dashboards and advanced features with flexible payment models.
Download Datadog vs. Zabbix Report
Zabbix has a low setup cost that appeals to budget-conscious teams, while Datadog requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust features.
View comparison
Pricing
Zabbix has a low setup cost that appeals to budget-conscious teams, while Datadog requires a higher initial investment, reflecting its robust features.
Datadog Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
Datadog offers a hosted model with minimal infrastructure maintenance and multidimensional metrics, making it suitable for comprehensive monitoring needs. In comparison, New Relic's real-time data insights enhance application performance monitoring, offering in-depth understanding for those prioritizing server and application health insights.
Download Datadog vs. New Relic Report
Datadog's setup cost is competitive and transparent, while New Relic tends to have a higher initial setup expense. Users often highlight Datadog's straightforward pricing model as a contrast to New Relic's more complex cost structure.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is competitive and transparent, while New Relic tends to have a higher initial setup expense. Users often highlight Datadog's straightforward pricing model as a contrast to New Relic's more complex cost structure.
Datadog Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Azure Monitor
3.9 out of 5
Datadog offers seamless feature integration and easy alert setup, appealing to tech buyers for multi-account AWS monitoring. In comparison, Azure Monitor integrates smoothly with Azure services and provides pay-as-you-go value, though deeper non-Azure support may be needed.
Download Azure Monitor vs. Datadog Report
Datadog has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Monitor, but offers extensive monitoring features. Azure Monitor is more cost-effective for initial setup with basic functionalities.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a higher setup cost compared to Azure Monitor, but offers extensive monitoring features. Azure Monitor is more cost-effective for initial setup with basic functionalities.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
Datadog offers seamless integrations and advanced monitoring across cloud services, making it a versatile choice for varied needs. In comparison, Elastic Observability's powerful search and scalability appeal to users needing multitenancy and security expansion.
Download Datadog vs. Elastic Observability Report
Datadog's setup cost is perceived as higher with complex pricing, while Elastic Observability is often seen as more cost-effective with flexible options. Elastic appeals to users seeking lower initial costs compared to Datadog's comprehensive solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is perceived as higher with complex pricing, while Elastic Observability is often seen as more cost-effective with flexible options. Elastic appeals to users seeking lower initial costs compared to Datadog's comprehensive solutions.
Datadog Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM excels in customizable alerts and modular pricing, attracting users needing network-based solutions. In comparison, Datadog integrates seamlessly with cloud services, appealing to those requiring observability and real-time monitoring in cloud-native environments.
Download Datadog vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Datadog, which may require additional investment during implementation. Users should consider these differences when evaluating the cost-effectiveness and budget requirements of each solution.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM offers a lower initial setup cost compared to Datadog, which may require additional investment during implementation. Users should consider these differences when evaluating the cost-effectiveness and budget requirements of each solution.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
PRTG Network Monitor offers rapid deployment and user-friendly licensing, making it cost-effective for smaller environments. In comparison, Datadog provides extensive integrations and multi-layered analytics, catering to complex environments with its depth and versatility.
Download Datadog vs. PRTG Network Monitor Report
PRTG Network Monitor typically involves a one-time setup cost, while Datadog incurs ongoing charges for setup. This difference highlights PRTG's upfront investment compared to Datadog's subscription-based model.
View comparison
Pricing
PRTG Network Monitor typically involves a one-time setup cost, while Datadog incurs ongoing charges for setup. This difference highlights PRTG's upfront investment compared to Datadog's subscription-based model.
Datadog Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
ThousandEyes
4.2 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive features for system observability, appealing to diverse cloud deployments. In comparison, ThousandEyes excels in network performance insights, ideal for pinpointing issues across complex network paths. Datadog and ThousandEyes both offer significant ROI, though through different monitoring specializations.
Download Datadog vs. ThousandEyes Report
Datadog incurs higher initial setup costs, contrasting with ThousandEyes, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option for businesses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog incurs higher initial setup costs, contrasting with ThousandEyes, which offers a more budget-friendly setup option for businesses.
Datadog Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
Nagios XI offers customizable plugins suitable for open-source environments but lacks modern GUI and API integration. In comparison, Datadog excels in integration and real-time analytics for cloud environments, though its complex pricing model requires careful management to avoid high costs.
Download Datadog vs. Nagios XI Report
Nagios XI has a higher setup cost with complex installation processes, while Datadog offers a more straightforward setup at a lower initial cost. This makes Datadog more accessible to users with limited budgets or less technical expertise.
View comparison
Pricing
Nagios XI has a higher setup cost with complex installation processes, while Datadog offers a more straightforward setup at a lower initial cost. This makes Datadog more accessible to users with limited budgets or less technical expertise.
Datadog Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Datadog Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
Datadog provides comprehensive monitoring with intuitive integrations and sharable dashboards, ideal for streamlined operations. In comparison, LogicMonitor focuses on customizable dashboards and managing complex data sets, offering custom monitoring solutions. Tech buyers might choose LogicMonitor for its cost-effective, competitive pricing.
Download Datadog vs. LogicMonitor Report
Datadog's setup cost is higher compared to LogicMonitor, which offers a lower setup cost, making LogicMonitor potentially more appealing for businesses focused on initial expenditure reduction.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is higher compared to LogicMonitor, which offers a lower setup cost, making LogicMonitor potentially more appealing for businesses focused on initial expenditure reduction.
Datadog Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Centreon
4.2 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive integrations and centralized data management, ideal for cloud environments. In comparison, Centreon provides customizable monitoring with strong plugin support for on-premises deployments. Datadog's modular pricing suits expansive needs, while Centreon offers cost benefits for smaller, budget-focused organizations.
Download Centreon vs. Datadog Report
Datadog involves a higher initial setup cost, focusing on comprehensive monitoring, while Centreon offers a more budget-friendly setup option, appealing to organizations with cost constraints.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog involves a higher initial setup cost, focusing on comprehensive monitoring, while Centreon offers a more budget-friendly setup option, appealing to organizations with cost constraints.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Auvik Network Management (ANM)
4.4 out of 5
Datadog excels with integrations, dashboards, and monitoring features for enhanced observability. In comparison, Auvik offers strong network discovery and automated mapping. Datadog provides smooth deployment across clouds; Auvik deploys quickly but needs improved UX for larger networks. Datadog's pricing is flexible, while Auvik's is predictable.
Download Auvik Network Management (ANM) vs. Datadog Report
Datadog has a higher setup cost compared to Auvik Network Management, which offers a more affordable setup process.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a higher setup cost compared to Auvik Network Management, which offers a more affordable setup process.
Datadog Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
Datadog features include sharable dashboards, automation, and centralized monitoring, ideal for varied use cases. In comparison, Checkmk appeals for affordability and simplicity, suited to budget-conscious users. Datadog is favored for cloud compatibility, while Checkmk excels in on-premises support and cost-effectiveness.
Download Checkmk vs. Datadog Report
Datadog has a higher initial setup cost compared to Checkmk, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a higher initial setup cost compared to Checkmk, which offers a more budget-friendly installation.
Datadog Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Datadog Logo
ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers a versatile platform ideal for multi-tenancy and application monitoring, customizable for various needs. In comparison, Datadog caters to detailed monitoring and seamless integration across environments, appealing to those focusing on ease of use and comprehensive insights.
Download Datadog vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic requires an initial setup cost, while Datadog offers a more straightforward setup process with minimal costs involved, highlighting a key difference in onboarding experiences between the two platforms.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic requires an initial setup cost, while Datadog offers a more straightforward setup process with minimal costs involved, highlighting a key difference in onboarding experiences between the two platforms.
Datadog Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Icinga
3.8 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive features ideal for large-scale monitoring, including easy integration and automation. In comparison, Icinga's strength is in its customization through a robust plugin system. Datadog provides flexible deployment with strong support; Icinga leverages a supportive open-source community.
Download Datadog vs. Icinga Report
Datadog's setup costs are high but offset by scalable monitoring features, while Icinga offers lower initial costs aimed at users seeking a more affordable, open-source option.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup costs are high but offset by scalable monitoring features, while Icinga offers lower initial costs aimed at users seeking a more affordable, open-source option.
Datadog Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Amazon CloudWatch
4.0 out of 5
Datadog excels with comprehensive monitoring, extensive integrations, and multi-cloud management, appealing to organizations seeking advanced analytics and visualization. In comparison, Amazon CloudWatch is optimal for AWS service monitoring, offering a cost-effective, seamless experience for AWS-dependent environments with basic alarm and logging features.
Download Amazon CloudWatch vs. Datadog Report
Datadog offers a flexible setup cost that allows for tailored configurations, while Amazon CloudWatch provides a straightforward setup fee, highlighting its ease of implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a flexible setup cost that allows for tailored configurations, while Amazon CloudWatch provides a straightforward setup fee, highlighting its ease of implementation.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight offers robust integration and infrastructure management for diverse IT needs, ideal for users seeking extensive monitoring consolidation. In comparison, Datadog provides ease of use and centralized observability, suitable for organizations requiring seamless multi-cloud monitoring with feature-rich dashboards.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. Datadog Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has been reported to have a higher initial setup cost compared to the more affordable setup cost for Datadog, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has been reported to have a higher initial setup cost compared to the more affordable setup cost for Datadog, highlighting a significant difference in upfront investment requirements between the two solutions.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver)
4.0 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive integrations and customizable metrics, suitable for complex environments. In comparison, Google Cloud operations suite features strong logging and cloud-native integration, appealing for cost-effectiveness. Datadog is versatile, whereas Google Cloud provides efficient public and private cloud deployment.
Download Datadog vs. Google Cloud's operations suite (formerly Stackdriver) Report
Datadog's setup cost is straightforward but can be high for small teams, whereas Google Cloud's operations suite offers a lower initial investment, better suited for scaling with usage.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is straightforward but can be high for small teams, whereas Google Cloud's operations suite offers a lower initial investment, better suited for scaling with usage.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Splunk Observability Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Splunk Observability Cloud excels in integration and customizable alerts with vibrant dashboards. In comparison, Datadog shines with sharable dashboards and anomaly detection. Splunk suits enterprises needing flexible licensing, while Datadog offers efficiency for users who handle its complex pricing structure.
Download Datadog vs. Splunk Observability Cloud Report
Datadog's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher upfront expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup cost is competitive and straightforward, whereas Splunk Observability Cloud involves higher upfront expenses.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
4.0 out of 5
Datadog excels with extensive integrations and customizable dashboards, aiding centralized cloud operations. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations prioritizes application reliability in cloud contexts. Datadog offers flexible pricing with comprehensive monitoring, while VMware provides cost-effective solutions but faces initial setup complexities.
Download Datadog vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
Datadog offers an affordable initial setup cost, allowing users to quickly deploy and scale. In contrast, VMware Aria Operations for Applications has a relatively higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive features for enterprise-level applications.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers an affordable initial setup cost, allowing users to quickly deploy and scale. In contrast, VMware Aria Operations for Applications has a relatively higher setup cost, focusing on comprehensive features for enterprise-level applications.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management offers comprehensive infrastructure visibility with robust alerting and scalability across multiple systems, enhancing operational efficiency. In comparison, Datadog provides unified monitoring with intuitive dashboards and efficient alert management, highlighting its flexibility and broad integration capabilities across cloud environments.
Download Datadog vs. IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) Report
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) has a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
View comparison
Pricing
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) has a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a more budget-friendly implementation.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
AppNeta by Broadcom
4.3 out of 5
AppNeta specializes in real-time network monitoring, offering affordability and ease of deployment. In comparison, Datadog provides a broad feature set, making it more costly but valuable for its comprehensive insights and integrations, appealing to those seeking long-term strategic benefits.
Download AppNeta by Broadcom vs. Datadog Report
AppNeta by Broadcom has a lower setup cost compared to Datadog, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment. However, Datadog's higher setup cost may be justified by its comprehensive feature set and capabilities.
View comparison
Pricing
AppNeta by Broadcom has a lower setup cost compared to Datadog, making it a more cost-effective option for initial deployment. However, Datadog's higher setup cost may be justified by its comprehensive feature set and capabilities.
Datadog Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Pandora FMS
4.6 out of 5
Datadog offers comprehensive cloud-based monitoring, ideal for cloud environments with intuitive tagging and integrations. In comparison, Pandora FMS provides flexibility for on-premises and cloud settings, appealing to those seeking an all-in-one solution for traditional infrastructures.
Download Datadog vs. Pandora FMS Report
Datadog has a higher setup cost, while Pandora FMS offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has a higher setup cost, while Pandora FMS offers a more cost-effective setup, highlighting a key difference in their pricing structures.
Datadog Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Catchpoint
4.1 out of 5
Catchpoint excels in network and endpoint visibility, offering cost-effective solutions and strong customer service for specialized monitoring needs. In comparison, Datadog provides extensive integrations, innovative analytics, and scalable deployment, making it ideal for diverse infrastructure and long-term operational savings.
Download Catchpoint vs. Datadog Report
Catchpoint's setup cost involves a more significant investment upfront compared to Datadog, which offers a lower entry point for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
Catchpoint's setup cost involves a more significant investment upfront compared to Datadog, which offers a lower entry point for initial setup.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
ManageEngine Applications Manager
3.8 out of 5
ManageEngine is preferred for its straightforward deployment and cost-effective pricing, offering real-time monitoring across servers and networks. In comparison, Datadog, with its advanced cloud monitoring and comprehensive integrations, justifies its higher cost with extensive features and robust analytics.
Download Datadog vs. ManageEngine Applications Manager Report
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, whereas Datadog has a more complex setup and requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
ManageEngine Applications Manager offers a straightforward setup with minimal initial cost, whereas Datadog has a more complex setup and requires a higher initial investment.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
DX Unified Infrastructure Management
4.1 out of 5
DX Unified Infrastructure Management excels with its probe library and non-Java stability, attracting those valuing scalability and customization. In comparison, Datadog’s real-time monitoring and intuitive dashboard integrations appeal to tech buyers seeking detailed visibility and streamlined cloud service experiences.
Download DX Unified Infrastructure Management vs. Datadog Report
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers high setup costs, reflecting its advanced capabilities, while Datadog provides a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users focused on core features.
View comparison
Pricing
DX Unified Infrastructure Management offers high setup costs, reflecting its advanced capabilities, while Datadog provides a more cost-effective setup, appealing to budget-conscious users focused on core features.
Datadog Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud excels in hybrid IT monitoring with real-time insights and ease of deployment. In comparison, Datadog offers extensive integrations and customizable analytics, meeting complex needs better. While Zenoss is cost-effective for small businesses, Datadog's premium pricing caters to enterprises with intricate infrastructure.
Download Datadog vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud requires an initial setup fee, while Datadog offers a cost-free setup option. Zenoss Cloud may involve additional charges during initial implementation, contrasting with Datadog's straightforward onboarding process.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud requires an initial setup fee, while Datadog offers a cost-free setup option. Zenoss Cloud may involve additional charges during initial implementation, contrasting with Datadog's straightforward onboarding process.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
SolarWinds AppOptics
3.9 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive integrations and hosted capabilities, appealing for environments needing flexibility and visibility. In comparison, SolarWinds AppOptics focuses on performance management and network analysis, suitable for smaller-scale setups with stable pricing and straightforward deployment.
Download Datadog vs. SolarWinds AppOptics Report
Datadog's setup costs are perceived as relatively high compared to SolarWinds AppOptics, which offers a more cost-effective installation process. The pricing difference is significant, making SolarWinds AppOptics more attractive for budget-conscious users.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup costs are perceived as relatively high compared to SolarWinds AppOptics, which offers a more cost-effective installation process. The pricing difference is significant, making SolarWinds AppOptics more attractive for budget-conscious users.
Datadog Logo
Opsview
4.3 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Opsview
4.3 out of 5
Opsview attracts tech buyers with its attractive pricing and strong support, providing comprehensive monitoring across diverse IT infrastructures. In comparison, Datadog's advanced features like real-time analytics and application performance monitoring offer compelling insights, appealing to those seeking in-depth analytics and quick scalability.
Download Datadog vs. Opsview Report
Opsview has a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a simpler and potentially more cost-effective setup. This difference in initial investment may significantly impact the decision for businesses considering these monitoring solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
Opsview has a higher setup cost compared to Datadog, which offers a simpler and potentially more cost-effective setup. This difference in initial investment may significantly impact the decision for businesses considering these monitoring solutions.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
NetApp Cloud Insights
4.3 out of 5
Datadog offers extensive features and integrations, appealing to users requiring robust analytics and diverse environment support. In comparison, NetApp Cloud Insights provides in-depth visibility for NetApp products, ideal for NetApp-centric users seeking multi-vendor optimization with a straightforward pricing model.
Download Datadog vs. NetApp Cloud Insights Report
Datadog has an initial setup cost that is straightforward, whereas NetApp Cloud Insights requires more detailed configuration. Datadog's simpler setup contrasts with NetApp's need for a more extensive process, highlighting a key difference in their ease of deployment.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog has an initial setup cost that is straightforward, whereas NetApp Cloud Insights requires more detailed configuration. Datadog's simpler setup contrasts with NetApp's need for a more extensive process, highlighting a key difference in their ease of deployment.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
Rakuten SixthSense
1 out of 5
Datadog offers comprehensive analytics and integration capabilities that make it ideal for real-time operational monitoring. In comparison, Rakuten SixthSense provides advanced data processing features, appealing to those seeking in-depth data insights and predictive analytics. Each product serves distinct IT management needs effectively.
Datadog offers a straightforward setup process with competitive costs, while Rakuten SixthSense involves a more complex implementation potentially leading to higher initial expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog offers a straightforward setup process with competitive costs, while Rakuten SixthSense involves a more complex implementation potentially leading to higher initial expenses.
Datadog Logo
Datadog Logo
ManageEngine Site24x7
4.0 out of 5
Datadog excels in integration capabilities and real-time monitoring with AI-driven alerts, suiting tech-centric needs. In comparison, ManageEngine Site24x7's comprehensive features and cost-effective pricing appeal to businesses seeking thorough, all-in-one monitoring across websites, servers, and applications.
Datadog often incurs higher setup costs, while ManageEngine Site24x7 users report more budget-friendly initial setup expenses.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog often incurs higher setup costs, while ManageEngine Site24x7 users report more budget-friendly initial setup expenses.
Datadog Logo
Coroot
1 out of 5
Datadog Logo
Coroot
1 out of 5
Datadog is known for comprehensive monitoring and scalability, providing in-depth insights across cloud applications. In comparison, Coroot offers rapid deployment and simplicity, making it attractive for those seeking immediate real-time insights with lower initial costs and efficient integration.
Datadog's setup costs can be substantial compared to Coroot’s more affordable pricing structure, making Datadog a potentially costlier choice when considering initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Datadog's setup costs can be substantial compared to Coroot’s more affordable pricing structure, making Datadog a potentially costlier choice when considering initial investment.

Related categories

Cloud Monitoring Software
Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
Network Monitoring Software