Amazon CloudWatch and Datadog are key players in the monitoring solution market. Datadog seems to have the upper hand due to its extensive integrations and visualization capabilities, rendering it more suitable for multi-cloud and diverse infrastructure environments.
Features: Datadog offers a hosted model with extensive integrations including AWS and Docker, sharable dashboards, and strong visualization capabilities that are ideal for actionable analytics. It supports a wide range of features like metrics, logs, APM, and provides seamless integration with major systems such as Splunk. Amazon CloudWatch, on the other hand, is native to AWS, offering excellent monitoring for AWS resources with straightforward integration, making it cost-effective and reliable for AWS environments.
Room for Improvement: Datadog faces criticism for its steep pricing and complex billing, with users calling for more transparent pricing and better internal usage visibility. Users also suggest improvements in alert capabilities and UI customization. For Amazon CloudWatch, the need for enhanced real-time data monitoring and more sophisticated dashboards is evident. Additionally, the platform lacks advanced APM and non-AWS integrations, pointing to potential growth in monitoring depth and adaptability for mobile apps.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog provides robust integration across diverse environments, including hybrid and private clouds, complemented by proactive support and comprehensive documentation. It offers a hands-on customer interaction experience, facilitating smooth deployment. Amazon CloudWatch, optimized for AWS, offers cost-effective and straightforward deployment for AWS users, with proactive customer service, albeit with room for responsiveness improvements.
Pricing and ROI: Datadog is often perceived as pricier, with costs escalating with increased usage. However, it offers significant ROI through reduced issue resolution times and detailed monitoring, justifying the expense for many users. Amazon CloudWatch, benefiting from a pay-as-you-go model, presents competitive pricing within AWS ecosystems, remaining a cost-effective solution for basic monitoring tasks, although costs may rise with extensive use.
Maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.
I like its filtering capability and its ability to give the cyber engine insights.
Amazon CloudWatch is used for monitoring, tracking logs, and organizing metrics across AWS services. It detects anomalies, sets dynamic alarms, and automates actions to optimize cloud utilization, troubleshoot, and ensure service availability.
Organizations leverage Amazon CloudWatch for collecting and analyzing logs, triggering alerts, and profiling application performance. It's also employed for monitoring bandwidth, virtual machines, Lambda functions, and Kubernetes clusters. Valuable features include seamless integration with AWS, real-time data and alerts, detailed metrics, and a user-friendly interface. It provides robust monitoring capabilities for infrastructure and application performance, log aggregation, and analytics. Users appreciate its scalability, ease of setup, and affordability. Additional key aspects are the ability to create alarms, dashboards, and automated responses, along with detailed insights into system and application health. Room for improvement includes dashboards and UI enhancements for better visualization and customizability, log streaming speed, advanced machine learning and reporting capabilities, pricing, and integration with non-AWS services and databases. Users also seek more real-time monitoring and comprehensive application performance features, and simpler alerts and configuration processes.
What are the most important features?
What benefits and ROI can users expect?
Amazon CloudWatch is implemented across a range of industries, including technology, finance, healthcare, and retail. Technology firms use it to monitor application performance and traffic, while financial organizations leverage it for ensuring compliance and system reliability. Healthcare entities rely on it for maintaining service availability and monitoring data flow, and retail companies utilize it for tracking customer interactions and optimizing server usage.
Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.
Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.
What are the key features of Datadog?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.