Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Amazon CloudWatch vs Amazon OpenSearch Service comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Oct 9, 2024

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

ROI

Sentiment score
7.2
Amazon CloudWatch provides efficient monitoring, reducing manual labor and enhancing ROI, prompting increased usage and cloud migration clarity.
No sentiment score available
 

Customer Service

Sentiment score
7.6
Amazon CloudWatch support is highly rated for its responsiveness, knowledgeable staff, and effective tiered support system with premium options.
Sentiment score
9.0
Amazon OpenSearch Service excels in customer service, with timely support and effective AI assistance like Amazon Q for queries.
I have had excellent support from AWS regarding OpenSearch, especially when dealing with performance issues impacted by ElasticCache.
We had one occasion where we needed to contact the technical support team, and they were able to resolve our issue efficiently.
 

Scalability Issues

Sentiment score
7.7
Amazon CloudWatch is scalable, reliable, and effectively manages data for large systems, making it ideal for organizational monitoring.
Sentiment score
8.9
Amazon OpenSearch Service offers scalable support for peak loads but requires manual scaling management for storage and server configurations.
It can be scaled out or up as needed, and deployments occur without downtime.
Amazon OpenSearch Service does not support auto-scaling, which limits scalability.
 

Stability Issues

Sentiment score
8.2
Amazon CloudWatch is highly reliable with 99% availability, consistent performance, minor data lag, and rare downtimes, despite occasional query complexities.
Sentiment score
8.2
Amazon OpenSearch Service is stable with minor latency issues in index operations, scoring eight out of ten for performance.
Elasticsearch has a stability rating of eight out of ten due to its nature as an in-memory database.
 

Room For Improvement

Amazon CloudWatch needs enhancements in customization, usability, data streaming, multi-cloud support, integration, machine learning, and comprehensive documentation.
Users seek customizable alerts, cost reductions, better visualization, auto-scaling support, and improved snapshot and upgrade processes in OpenSearch.
Maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.
The current configuration does not support automatic scaling based on server load, requiring us to manage the scaling manually.
It would be beneficial if OpenSearch had its data visualization platform instead of Kibana and if it could be integrated with Compute Optimizer Service for better rightsizing.
 

Setup Cost

Amazon CloudWatch offers competitive pricing with a flexible pay-as-you-go model, influenced by usage and integration needs.
Amazon OpenSearch Service costs more than self-managed options, with mixed opinions on cost-effectiveness versus capabilities.
Amazon OpenSearch Service is a bit costly compared to self-hosted Elasticsearch due to the managed service pricing.
The price is fair yet leans towards the expensive side.
 

Valuable Features

Amazon CloudWatch provides seamless AWS integration, real-time data, robust analytics, automation, security features, and cross-platform log storage.
I like its filtering capability and its ability to give the cyber engine insights.
It's a flexible database that allows for fast searching of terabytes of data compared to other databases.
Scalability is a key feature as it allows easy scaling of the platform without downtime.
 

Categories and Ranking

Amazon CloudWatch
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
12th
Ranking in Log Management
12th
Average Rating
8.0
Reviews Sentiment
7.2
Number of Reviews
45
Ranking in other categories
Cloud Monitoring Software (9th)
Amazon OpenSearch Service
Ranking in Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability
45th
Ranking in Log Management
39th
Average Rating
7.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.6
Number of Reviews
4
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Featured Reviews

Rasanpreet Singh - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable AWS monitoring and logging
The choice of logging solution should always be determined by the specific business requirements. It is crucial to align the logging strategy with what type of logs are needed and how they should be used. There are instances where we require custom solutions to retrieve logs, especially application logs that may not be easily accessible through CloudWatch or similar services. When we heavily rely on AWS native services, CloudWatch is indeed a robust choice. However, in certain scenarios, we might need integration capabilities with other tools, and if they can incorporate such features, it would enhance overall logging capabilities. I would rate it eight out of ten.
VijayKumar27 - PeerSpot reviewer
Effective as a vector store, serverless architecture but there aren't enough security features
The pricing aspect is a concern. The service is way too costly. For the past month, I used only 30 to 40 MB of data, and the cost was $500. AWS could improve pricing. Even being serverless, it incurs charges during idle times. For just holding data, you need to create a list. AWS should add an option to make data idle, so it won't include computing charges. They charge for OCU units based on the time the serverless solution is up, not on indexing or retrieval speed. Once the service starts, it starts getting billed. It would help if there were an option to limit computing. When using it as a database, storing data without frequent fetching would save computing costs.
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability solutions are best for your needs.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Manufacturing Company
9%
University
5%
Financial Services Firm
17%
Computer Software Company
13%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon CloudWatch?
In general, Amazon CloudWatch is cheaper compared to Dynatrace. However, there are potential costs to be mindful of, like running a log query that returns trillions of bytes of data.
What needs improvement with Amazon CloudWatch?
CloudWatch itself is fine. That said, maybe Amazon Web Services can improve by providing a library for CloudWatch with some useful features.
What do you like most about Amazon OpenSearch Service?
We retrieve historical data with just a click of a button to move it from cold to hot or warm because it's already stored in the backend storage
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Amazon OpenSearch Service?
Amazon OpenSearch Service is a bit costly compared to self-hosted Elasticsearch due to the managed service pricing.
What needs improvement with Amazon OpenSearch Service?
One improvement I would like to see is support for auto-scaling. The current configuration does not support automatic scaling based on server load, requiring us to manage the scaling manually. Addi...
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

AirAsia, Airbnb, Aircel, APUS, Avazu, Casa & Video, Futbol Club Barcelona (FCBarcelona), National Taiwan University, redBus
Information Not Available
Find out what your peers are saying about Amazon CloudWatch vs. Amazon OpenSearch Service and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.