Datadog and Azure Monitor are prominent contenders in the realm of IT infrastructure monitoring tools. Datadog holds an advantage with its intuitive design and seamless integration capabilities, providing a superior user experience.
Features: Datadog offers shareable dashboards, anomaly detection, and centralized monitoring. It also provides ease of use for both technical and non-technical users and supports extensive integrations. Azure Monitor is adept at tracking metrics, logs, and application performance, delivering a comprehensive monitoring solution to track various resources in real-time.
Room for Improvement: Datadog users express a need for better pricing clarity, enhanced documentation, and improved integration cohesion. Interface improvements and dashboard management could elevate user satisfaction. Azure Monitor would benefit from broader integration with non-Azure ecosystems, improved visualization capabilities, and streamlined navigation to reduce complexity.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Datadog boasts a versatile deployment model compatible with multiple cloud environments. It is often commended for chat support, offering quick solutions to deployment challenges, although experiences with technical support vary. Azure Monitor also supports various cloud settings but is noted for inconsistent customer service, with areas for improvement in response times.
Pricing and ROI: Datadog's pricing model, while flexible, can become costly due to its usage-based nature, but users recognize significant ROI through resource savings. Azure Monitor's pay-as-you-go structure is lauded for cost-effectiveness, particularly for Azure subscribers, though accumulative storage costs for logs are a concern. Azure Monitor's costs are generally regarded as more predictable compared to Datadog's.
However, the second-line support is good.
Azure Monitor is working fine, yet I face a costing issue as if there are a lot of logs collected in the workspace or in the center, it becomes very costly.
If Azure Monitor can independently add one gigabyte, two gigabytes, or five gigabytes at least to log storage, I can fix the logs without syncing with Log Analytics Workspace and Sentinel.
The documentation is adequate, but team members coming into a project could benefit from more guided, interactive tutorials, ideally leveraging real-world data.
There should be a clearer view of the expenses.
When I export logs into the application, workspace, log analytic workspace, and into Sentinel to read reports, I need to add storage, which increases the cost.
The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100.
Resource monitoring is essential.
Our architecture is written in several languages, and one area where Datadog particularly shines is in providing first-class support for a multitude of programming languages.
The technology itself is generally very useful.
Azure Monitor is a comprehensive monitoring solution offered by Microsoft Azure. It provides a centralized platform for monitoring the performance and health of various Azure resources, applications, and infrastructure.
With Azure Monitor, users can gain insights into the availability, performance, and usage of their applications and infrastructure. The key features of Azure Monitor include metrics, logs, alerts, and dashboards. Metrics allow users to collect and analyze performance data from various Azure resources, such as virtual machines, databases, and storage accounts.
Logs enable users to collect and analyze log data from different sources, including Azure resources, applications, and operating systems. Azure Monitor also provides a robust alerting mechanism that allows users to set up alerts based on specific conditions or thresholds. These alerts can be configured to notify users via email, SMS, or other notification channels. Additionally, Azure Monitor offers customizable dashboards that allow users to visualize and analyze their monitoring data in a personalized and intuitive manner.
Azure Monitor integrates seamlessly with other Azure services, such as Azure Automation and Azure Logic Apps, enabling users to automate actions based on monitoring data. It also supports integration with third-party monitoring tools and services, providing flexibility and extensibility.
Overall, Azure Monitor is a powerful and versatile monitoring solution that helps users gain deep insights into the performance and health of their Azure resources and applications. It offers a wide range of features and integrations, making it a comprehensive solution for monitoring and managing Azure environments.
Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.
Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.
What are the key features of Datadog?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
