ScienceLogic and Datadog compete in the IT monitoring space. ScienceLogic seems to have the upper hand with its customization and integration versatility, while Datadog offers a user-friendly interface with powerful real-time monitoring capabilities.
Features: ScienceLogic offers extensive customization, seamless integration across various systems, and multi-tenant management capabilities. It also provides granular data visibility that aids in managing diverse IT infrastructures. Datadog is renowned for its intuitive interface and comprehensive dashboards. It integrates extensively with cloud environments, providing real-time monitoring and visualization of system metrics, which are key to its popularity among users.
Room for Improvement: ScienceLogic could enhance its knowledge base and troubleshooting procedures, which some users find difficult to navigate without technical help. There is also a call for more simplified reporting tools and API expansions. Datadog users have raised issues regarding its querying and logging functionalities, as well as cost transparency and the integration of advanced anomaly detection tools. There are mentions of Datadog's steep learning curve and complex billing setups that could be refined.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ScienceLogic is noted for its robust deployment options across on-premises, private, and hybrid cloud setups. The customer service receives high praise for its engagement and technical expertise. Datadog, mostly used in public and hybrid clouds, sees varied feedback on support and customer service. While technically proficient, improvements are suggested in responsiveness and onboarding instructions for scaling.
Pricing and ROI: ScienceLogic's pricing model, based on device tiers, appeals to large enterprises due to its flexibility, though it can become costly at scale. This pricing is seen as justified by its capabilities and long-term value. Datadog's usage-based pricing model is flexible but poses challenges in cost predictability, especially with rapid scaling. Both ScienceLogic and Datadog report positive ROI through increased efficiency and faster problem resolution times; however, unforeseen costs could restrict smaller enterprises from utilizing Datadog.
The return on investment is fair but often challenged by medium-sized businesses who may question its adequacy.
I received excellent support from ScienceLogic.
Problems with Skylar may require longer wait times due to limited resource expertise.
The stability rating is nine out of ten, acknowledging some bugs, but indicating these are minor issues.
The documentation is adequate, but team members coming into a project could benefit from more guided, interactive tutorials, ideally leveraging real-world data.
There should be a clearer view of the expenses.
While some other companies have easier APIs, using this solution demands significant expertise.
If the knowledge for implementation could be spread through articles, it would reduce this dependency.
Integrating observability and APM monitoring into the overall portfolio would be beneficial.
The setup cost for Datadog is more than $100.
ScienceLogic is not that expensive and is cost-effective overall.
It could be cheaper.
Our architecture is written in several languages, and one area where Datadog particularly shines is in providing first-class support for a multitude of programming languages.
The technology itself is generally very useful.
Notably, its automation features, such as Runbook action, enable domain experts like me to execute one-click automation solutions, which contributes significantly to reducing MTTR.
The solution excels in three areas: application monitoring, server monitoring, and network performance monitoring.
The CMDB update and the automatic CMDB update are valuable.
Datadog is a comprehensive cloud monitoring platform designed to track performance, availability, and log aggregation for cloud resources like AWS, ECS, and Kubernetes. It offers robust tools for creating dashboards, observing user behavior, alerting, telemetry, security monitoring, and synthetic testing.
Datadog supports full observability across cloud providers and environments, enabling troubleshooting, error detection, and performance analysis to maintain system reliability. It offers detailed visualization of servers, integrates seamlessly with cloud providers like AWS, and provides powerful out-of-the-box dashboards and log analytics. Despite its strengths, users often note the need for better integration with other solutions and improved application-level insights. Common challenges include a complex pricing model, setup difficulties, and navigation issues. Users frequently mention the need for clearer documentation, faster loading times, enhanced error traceability, and better log management.
What are the key features of Datadog?
What benefits and ROI should users look for in reviews?
Datadog is implemented across different industries, from tech companies monitoring cloud applications to finance sectors ensuring transactional systems' performance. E-commerce platforms use Datadog to track and visualize user behavior and system health, while healthcare organizations utilize it for maintaining secure, compliant environments. Every implementation assists teams in customizing monitoring solutions specific to their industry's requirements.
ScienceLogic is a comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring solution that supports networks, servers, cloud environments, and applications, suitable for private cloud and on-premises deployments.
Organizations leverage ScienceLogic for its robust capabilities in monitoring IT infrastructures of all sizes. It offers granular discovery, integration with CMDB, and ticketing systems. Valued for its flexibility, incident automation, remediation, and real-time relationship mapping, it supports hybrid environments with scalable and efficient monitoring functionalities. AI and machine learning enhance its feature set, while ease of deployment and strong support are crucial benefits.
What are ScienceLogic's most important features?ScienceLogic is implemented across multiple industries, including large enterprises, for its capability to handle complex IT ecosystems. Its integration with CMDB and ticketing systems ensures it fits within existing workflows. Organizations use it to monitor diverse infrastructure landscapes, ensuring seamless performance and quick incident resolution.
We monitor all IT Infrastructure Monitoring reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.