Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
ScienceLogic Logo

Top 10 ScienceLogic Alternatives

Vendor: ScienceLogic
4.3 out of 5
Badge Ranked 1
1,862 followers
Post review

Top ScienceLogic Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to ScienceLogic based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include Datadog, Zabbix, and New Relic. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions. ScienceLogic surpasses its competitors by offering comprehensive IT infrastructure monitoring, advanced automation, and integrations that enable businesses to efficiently manage and optimize their complex environments.

ScienceLogic Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with ScienceLogic, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
ScienceLogic Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
Datadog
4.3 out of 5
ScienceLogic is favored for its flexible deployment models and superior customer service. In comparison, Datadog is praised for its extensive integration capabilities and real-time monitoring. ScienceLogic offers robust automation and customizable dashboards, while Datadog excels with comprehensive monitoring and broader integration support.
Download Datadog vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic presents a lower setup cost compared to Datadog, which tends to have higher initial expenses. This significant difference in setup costs could influence budget-conscious users to lean towards ScienceLogic.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic presents a lower setup cost compared to Datadog, which tends to have higher initial expenses. This significant difference in setup costs could influence budget-conscious users to lean towards ScienceLogic.
ScienceLogic Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
Zabbix
4.1 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers comprehensive monitoring and automation, suitabe for hybrid cloud environments. In comparison, Zabbix provides flexibility and strong metric support with extensive customization options. ScienceLogic is easier to deploy with strong customer support, while Zabbix is open-source and cost-effective, though more complex to set up.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Zabbix Report
ScienceLogic has a high setup cost according to user reviews, while Zabbix offers a cost-effective setup option.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has a high setup cost according to user reviews, while Zabbix offers a cost-effective setup option.
ScienceLogic Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
New Relic
4.2 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers comprehensive monitoring and automation for hybrid IT environments. In comparison, New Relic features advanced analytics and APM for deep application performance insights. While ScienceLogic excels in broad visibility, New Relic's analytics provide superior insights, making either a strong choice based on specific needs.
Download New Relic vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic has a higher setup cost, whereas New Relic offers a more affordable initial investment. This key difference in setup cost may influence your decision based on your budget.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has a higher setup cost, whereas New Relic offers a more affordable initial investment. This key difference in setup cost may influence your decision based on your budget.
ScienceLogic Logo
ScienceLogic Logo
Elastic Observability
4.0 out of 5
ScienceLogic excels with multi-tenant environments, custom dashboards, and flexible integrations for comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Elastic Observability is recognized for easy deployment and powerful search in an open-source framework, suitable for hybrid clouds with strong analytics and visualization through Kibana.
Download Elastic Observability vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic's setup cost is straightforward with a comprehensive pricing model, while Elastic Observability offers a flexible pricing structure based on usage, highlighting differences in cost predictability and scalability.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic's setup cost is straightforward with a comprehensive pricing model, while Elastic Observability offers a flexible pricing structure based on usage, highlighting differences in cost predictability and scalability.
ScienceLogic Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
SolarWinds NPM
4.1 out of 5
SolarWinds NPM offers modular pricing and deep packet analysis, appealing to multipurpose network needs. In comparison, ScienceLogic excels in multi-tenancy and integration, ideal for complex environments requiring streamlined management across diverse infrastructures. SolarWinds ensures cost-effective monitoring, while ScienceLogic supports diverse and comprehensive monitoring.
Download ScienceLogic vs. SolarWinds NPM Report
SolarWinds NPM setup costs are straightforward and budget-friendly, while ScienceLogic's initial cost may be higher due to its extensive features, highlighting a clear distinction in their pricing structures.
View comparison
Pricing
SolarWinds NPM setup costs are straightforward and budget-friendly, while ScienceLogic's initial cost may be higher due to its extensive features, highlighting a clear distinction in their pricing structures.
ScienceLogic Logo
ScienceLogic Logo
PRTG Network Monitor
4.1 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers customization for large enterprises with diverse environments; its flexibility is optimal for complex infrastructures. In comparison, PRTG Network Monitor facilitates rapid deployment and ease of use, ideal for smaller systems with straightforward pricing and intuitive features.
Download PRTG Network Monitor vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic incurs higher setup cost than PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. ScienceLogic provides advanced features as a justification for its cost, while PRTG appeals with affordability and simplicity.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic incurs higher setup cost than PRTG Network Monitor, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup. ScienceLogic provides advanced features as a justification for its cost, while PRTG appeals with affordability and simplicity.
ScienceLogic Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
Nagios XI
4.0 out of 5
ScienceLogic prioritizes usability and advanced automation, making it ideal for comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, Nagios XI offers robust customization and detailed monitoring tools suitable for users seeking flexibility. ScienceLogic’s straightforward deployment contrasts Nagios XI’s complex setup, but Nagios XI’s modular pricing appeals to budget-conscious buyers.
Download Nagios XI vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic has a higher setup cost compared to Nagios XI. While Nagios XI offers a more affordable initial investment, ScienceLogic provides extensive features for advanced monitoring needs.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has a higher setup cost compared to Nagios XI. While Nagios XI offers a more affordable initial investment, ScienceLogic provides extensive features for advanced monitoring needs.
ScienceLogic Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
LogicMonitor
4.5 out of 5
ScienceLogic's comprehensive device support and automation make it an attractive option for tech buyers seeking value. In comparison, LogicMonitor's scalability, intuitive design, and advanced reporting cater to those needing sophisticated features. ScienceLogic offers straightforward deployment; LogicMonitor impresses with quick implementation and responsive support.
Download LogicMonitor vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic's setup cost is moderately priced but entails some initial complexity, while LogicMonitor offers a higher setup cost with a simpler configuration process. The emphasis is on ScienceLogic's affordability versus LogicMonitor's ease of setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic's setup cost is moderately priced but entails some initial complexity, while LogicMonitor offers a higher setup cost with a simpler configuration process. The emphasis is on ScienceLogic's affordability versus LogicMonitor's ease of setup.
ScienceLogic Logo
ScienceLogic Logo
ServiceNow IT Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers robust real-time monitoring and predictive analysis, favored for dynamic operations. In comparison, ServiceNow IT Operations Management provides superior integration with other ITSM modules. ScienceLogic's straightforward deployment suits small to medium enterprises, while ServiceNow accommodates complex implementations with comprehensive support. ScienceLogic's competitive pricing contrasts ServiceNow's higher ROI for larger enterprises.
Download ScienceLogic vs. ServiceNow IT Operations Management Report
ScienceLogic users highlight straightforward setup costs, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management users note higher initial costs.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic users highlight straightforward setup costs, while ServiceNow IT Operations Management users note higher initial costs.
ScienceLogic Logo
Cisco Intersight
3.9 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
Cisco Intersight
3.9 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers high customization and granular permissions, ideal for complex environments requiring detailed control. In comparison, Cisco Intersight excels in cloud integration and manageability, suitable for those prioritizing hybrid cloud environments and orchestration capabilities within a unified platform.
Download Cisco Intersight vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic offers a competitive setup cost that benefits smaller enterprises, while Cisco Intersight typically incurs higher initial expenses, which may concern budget-conscious customers.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic offers a competitive setup cost that benefits smaller enterprises, while Cisco Intersight typically incurs higher initial expenses, which may concern budget-conscious customers.
ScienceLogic Logo
ScienceLogic Logo
BMC TrueSight Operations Management
4.1 out of 5
BMC TrueSight users value its monitoring and analytics, despite initial setup costs. In comparison, ScienceLogic excels in automation and visibility but needs better UI. BMC TrueSight could improve in scalability, while ScienceLogic requires enhanced reporting. BMC TrueSight offers long-term ROI, with ScienceLogic recommended for pricing and deployment.
Download BMC TrueSight Operations Management vs. ScienceLogic Report
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a high setup cost, while ScienceLogic offers a lower setup cost. The more affordable initial investment for ScienceLogic highlights a significant difference between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
BMC TrueSight Operations Management has a high setup cost, while ScienceLogic offers a lower setup cost. The more affordable initial investment for ScienceLogic highlights a significant difference between the two solutions.
ScienceLogic Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
Checkmk
4.2 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers comprehensive monitoring and ease of integration. In comparison, Checkmk provides superior flexibility and customization. ScienceLogic needs better scalability and reporting. In comparison, Checkmk requires a more intuitive configuration and documentation. ScienceLogic ensures smoother deployment and better support, whereas Checkmk justifies higher costs with long-term features.
Download Checkmk vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Checkmk, which requires a higher investment upfront.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic offers a more affordable setup cost compared to Checkmk, which requires a higher investment upfront.
ScienceLogic Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
ITRS Geneos
4.1 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers flexibility and extensive customization, ideal for diverse environments. In comparison, ITRS Geneos excels in real-time monitoring and is suited for financial services. ScienceLogic provides robust integration tools, while ITRS Geneos emphasizes application monitoring with fast response times for complex infrastructures.
Download ITRS Geneos vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic offers a simpler setup process with minimal upfront costs, whereas ITRS Geneos requires a more complex, potentially costly setup. This distinction in setup costs highlights the difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic offers a simpler setup process with minimal upfront costs, whereas ITRS Geneos requires a more complex, potentially costly setup. This distinction in setup costs highlights the difference in initial investment between the two solutions.
ScienceLogic Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
OpsRamp
4.0 out of 5
ScienceLogic excels in support and lower pricing, whereas OpsRamp offers superior features, justifying its higher cost. ScienceLogic is noted for its straightforward deployment and excellent customer support. In comparison, OpsRamp's extensive features and integrations make it a preferred choice despite higher pricing.
Download OpsRamp vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic users report a high setup cost while OpsRamp users highlight a more moderate setup expense.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic users report a high setup cost while OpsRamp users highlight a more moderate setup expense.
ScienceLogic Logo
ScienceLogic Logo
VMware Aria Operations for Applications
3.8 out of 5

ScienceLogic excels in flexibility, customization, and high-level integration, making it ideal for detailed monitoring. In comparison, VMware Aria Operations emphasizes fast virtualization across environments, benefiting those needing robust support for open-source technologies. ScienceLogic's device-tiered pricing contrasts VMware's higher licensing complexity.

Download ScienceLogic vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications Report
ScienceLogic setup costs are generally perceived as higher, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers more scalable pricing options. ScienceLogic may require a greater initial investment compared to the adaptable financial model of VMware Aria.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic setup costs are generally perceived as higher, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications offers more scalable pricing options. ScienceLogic may require a greater initial investment compared to the adaptable financial model of VMware Aria.
ScienceLogic Logo
ScienceLogic Logo
IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM)
4.2 out of 5
ScienceLogic excels in automated discovery and hybrid cloud monitoring, ideal for quick deployment. In comparison, IBM SevOne NPM offers advanced analytics and scalability, justifying higher costs for extensive features and customization. ScienceLogic's integrated support makes it appealing, while IBM SevOne NPM's long-term ROI attracts tech buyers.
Download IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic has a relatively low setup cost, whereas IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) exhibits a higher cost for initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has a relatively low setup cost, whereas IBM SevOne Network Performance Management (NPM) exhibits a higher cost for initial setup.
ScienceLogic Logo
BigPanda
3.6 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
BigPanda
3.6 out of 5
ScienceLogic offers competitive pricing and comprehensive monitoring. In comparison, BigPanda provides advanced event correlation, making it valuable despite higher costs. ScienceLogic's customer support is strong, whereas BigPanda simplifies deployment. However, ScienceLogic's setup challenges and BigPanda's need for better documentation should be considered.
Download BigPanda vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic has an expensive setup cost compared to BigPanda, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has an expensive setup cost compared to BigPanda, which offers a more budget-friendly initial setup.
ScienceLogic Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
Moogsoft
3.8 out of 5
ScienceLogic is recognized for its comprehensive monitoring and automation capabilities. In comparison, Moogsoft excels with advanced machine learning and AIOps functionalities. ScienceLogic's easy deployment and responsive customer service appeal to buyers, while Moogsoft’s innovative features and high ROI potential justify its premium pricing.
Download Moogsoft vs. ScienceLogic Report
ScienceLogic has a straightforward setup cost, while Moogsoft's setup cost is higher and more complex, often requiring additional resources.
View comparison
Pricing
ScienceLogic has a straightforward setup cost, while Moogsoft's setup cost is higher and more complex, often requiring additional resources.
ScienceLogic Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
ScienceLogic Logo
Zenoss Cloud
4.2 out of 5
Zenoss Cloud offers strong monitoring and scalability for large enterprises, appealing to those seeking cost-effective solutions. In comparison, ScienceLogic provides advanced automation and extensive integration, making it ideal for those requiring detailed insights. Zenoss has simpler deployment, whereas ScienceLogic offers comprehensive setup guides.
Download ScienceLogic vs. Zenoss Cloud Report
Zenoss Cloud offers a more straightforward setup cost, while ScienceLogic requires a higher initial investment.
View comparison
Pricing
Zenoss Cloud offers a more straightforward setup cost, while ScienceLogic requires a higher initial investment.

Related categories

IT Infrastructure Monitoring
Event Monitoring
Network Monitoring Software