We performed a comparison between Datadog and VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront based on our users’ reviews in four categories. After reading all of the collected data, you can find our conclusion below.
Features: Datadog is recognized for its advantageous attributes including customizable visualizations, bug identification, user-friendly interface for developers, integration capabilities, log analysis, and troubleshooting abilities. Additionally, it offers high performance and flexibility. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront is commended for its effortless installation, compatibility with various solutions, support for container platforms, swift data processing, enhanced visibility, and exceptional support provided by VMware. Datadog could enhance usability, integration, user interface intuitiveness, external website monitoring, SSL security, and setup complexity. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront could improve its billing model, customization of dashboards, documentation, and initial setup process.
Service and Support: Users have generally praised the customer service of Datadog, noting its availability and promptness. However, there have been occasional cases where support was slow or unresponsive. VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront has received mixed feedback. Some users did not require support, while others experienced assistance at varying levels of satisfaction.
Ease of Deployment: Reviewers have found the initial setup for Datadog to be simple and uncomplicated, often receiving help from service providers or technical support. The setup process for VMware Tanzu differs among users, with some finding it effortless and speedy, while others perceive it as more intricate, necessitating technical proficiency and collaboration from multiple teams.
Pricing: Users have different opinions about the setup cost of Datadog, with some finding it pricey and others finding it reasonable. However, the pricing model is unclear and lacks documentation. VMware Tanzu is also deemed expensive, with high licensing expenses for integrations and additional features.
Comparison Results: Datadog is the preferred choice when compared to VMware Tanzu Observability by Wavefront. Users appreciate Datadog's easy setup, user-friendly interface, extensive integrations, and valuable features such as dashboards, error reporting, log centralization, and troubleshooting capabilities. The flexibility, performance, and observability provided by Datadog are also highly praised.
"We rely heavily on the API crawlers that Datadog uses for cloud integrations. These allow us to pick up and leverage the tags teams have already deployed without having also to make them add them at the agent level."
"Datadog is providing efficiency in the products we develop for the wireless device engineering department."
"Even if we don't end up using Datadog, it revealed problems and optimizations to us that weren't obvious before."
"Datadog helps us detect issues early on and helps in troubleshooting."
"The solution allows flexibility and heightened observability for presenting data, creating indicators, and setting service-level objectives."
"I like the amount of tooling and the number of solutions they sold with their monitoring. Datadog was highly intuitive to use."
"We can handle debugging and find out why things are breaking in our applications."
"The most valuable feature of Datadog is its logs."
"Tanzu itself, integrated with multiple solutions, bestows support and security upon a container platform, especially when it comes to managing open-source container platforms such as Kubernetes."
"For us, the ease of deployment in combination with TMZ was the most important part because we don't have to manually deploy a complex monitoring solution. We can more or less do that with the click of a button, and we are not dependent on the developers to provide us with all the necessary features and functions to make that work. We can just deploy it on a workload cluster and monitor at least a good part of the workload. If we want to go into detail, we clearly need to make changes, but for a good part of application monitoring, it gives us good insights."
"VMware comes with a support team, and if you have trouble, you can easily create a ticket, and VMware will help you. Therefore, the best aspect is the support."
"This solution allows me to have true visibility for any metrics when it comes to my cloud, and private."
"The solution is great for virtualization and preparing the infrastructure in Tanzu to test products. It's very fast and has good visibility."
"No issues with stability."
"The most valuable aspects of the solution are its ease of use and its ease of implementation."
"The features I find most valuable is the querying and alerting capabilities."
"While the tool is robust with many different capabilities, users would greatly benefit from more examples in the documentation."
"The product could do better with its notifications."
"The parallel editing of the dashboards should not cause users to lose the work of another person."
"Datadog is expensive."
"Datadog needs more local Asia-Pacific support, and if they don't have a SaaS solution in Asia-Pacific, they should offer an on-prem version. I'm told that's not possible."
"If there were a more cost-effective manner of deploying the tool, we'd be more likely to adopt it more widely."
"I found the documentation can sometimes be confusing."
"To be very fair, I haven't had enough experience with Datadog to pick out improvements."
"Its billing model is consumption-based. I understand the consumption-based model, but it is not necessarily easy to estimate and guess how many points or how much we are going to consume on a specific application up until we get to that point. So, for us, it would be helpful to have more insights or predictability into what we can expect from a cost perspective if we are starting to use specific features. This can potentially also drive our consumption a bit more."
"It could use a URL document server. Everything in the market is moving towards automation and everybody's looking for the single click operations as well relational data locality."
"I would like to see integration with Kubernetes cluster and APIs so that you can manage the entire stack."
"The main problem I have is that the license cost is very high."
"The initial setup should be easier and more seamless."
"The documentation and integration with Kubernetes could be improved."
"The implementation is a long process that should be improved."
"In the new version, I would love to see more prediction capabilities. It would be great if one could see the alerts get a little more enriched with information and become more human-friendly instead of the technical stuff that they put in there. I think those would be really awesome outcomes to get."
More VMware Aria Operations for Applications Pricing and Cost Advice →
Datadog is ranked 1st in Cloud Monitoring Software with 137 reviews while VMware Aria Operations for Applications is ranked 28th in Cloud Monitoring Software with 9 reviews. Datadog is rated 8.6, while VMware Aria Operations for Applications is rated 7.6. The top reviewer of Datadog writes "Very good RUM, synthetics, and infrastructure host maps". On the other hand, the top reviewer of VMware Aria Operations for Applications writes "Easy to deploy, worth the money, and helpful for uptime monitoring and performance insights". Datadog is most compared with Dynatrace, Azure Monitor, New Relic, AWS X-Ray and Elastic Observability, whereas VMware Aria Operations for Applications is most compared with Dynatrace, Grafana, Zabbix, AppDynamics and Prometheus. See our Datadog vs. VMware Aria Operations for Applications report.
See our list of best Cloud Monitoring Software vendors, best Application Performance Monitoring (APM) and Observability vendors, and best IT Infrastructure Monitoring vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Monitoring Software reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.