In my previous company, we relied on this solution as a part of the data center core switch. Everything inside the data center was connected through this unit.
A scalable solution that has grown with our infrastructure over the past ten years
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and reliability."
- "Enhancing the software-defined level of this solution would empower it."
What is our primary use case?
How has it helped my organization?
This solution has helped the data center in the bank's infrastructure to expand over the past ten years. Both the reliability and scalability of this solution helped to support this growth.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features of this solution are scalability and reliability.
Scalability is important as the business moves forward. As the number of bank branches grows, the traffic grows. You need to rely on a solid Cisco product in the data center to support this.
What needs improvement?
Enhancing the software-defined level of this solution would empower it.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Nexus
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Nexus. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
For how long have I used the solution?
Approximately ten years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
While I am not a technical person, I can comment on this solution's stability from a management perspective because I keep my eyes on the incidents. I have to look at all of the incidents that are reported through the data center. I can't remember having any incident raised regarding this product.
From this perspective, I can say that stability is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This solution is quite scalable, although this product comes in different families including an enterprise-level version and a mid-level version. Scalability depends on how the switch has been configured and the technical specifications that are related to it.
How are customer service and support?
Technical support is part of Cisco's overall goodwill.
The support level is good and it is reliable, as well. It is also quite convenient for us as a financial institution.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
The choice to move to this solution was based on our business strategy. It is a top-down approach, where the business strategy is passed down and the technical architecture is evaluated. After this is complete, a decision is made to either invest in a new solution or continue to rely on the old one.
In our case, this was the solution that we needed to accommodate our business strategy.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of this solution is straightforward.
Something like this always goes through a pre-planning stage. Kicking off the project requires that all of the prerequisites are in place. All of the information is gathered and the final scope is identified. This can be something that is straightforward or very complex.
In the bank that I have been working with, we were building the infrastructure from scratch. This is the reason it has been a straightforward project, rather than a complex one.
What about the implementation team?
We had a very reliable Cisco partner implement this solution for us. Their name is Raya Integration, and they are one of the dominant Cisco partners across Egypt.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We considered both Cisco and Juniper for our infrastructure. My experience with Cisco over the past twenty years has been good. Also, this specific product is both reliable and scalable, which were all things that we considered when we adopted this solution.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution a nine out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
CEO at a construction company with 11-50 employees
Stable and easy to use modular and fixed port network switches
Pros and Cons
- "It's easy to use, and the performance is great."
- "The price could be better."
What is our primary use case?
We use Cisco Nexus for the switches. It's a switch product, and I think we have 350 users on our network.
What is most valuable?
It's easy to use, and the performance is great. I like the VRF IP route for the network. It's five minutes of work.
What needs improvement?
The price could be better.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been using Cisco Nexus for the last three years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
Cisco Nexus is stable, and the performance is great.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Cisco Nexus is a scalable product.
How are customer service and technical support?
I have contacted technical support many times, and I am satisfied with my experience.
How was the initial setup?
The installations were easy. The time to deploy depends on the model and the size of the product you will be using. But it will definitely take hours. We have ten people in our team to implement and maintain this solution. But it depends on the project. Sometimes we will have 15 people working on it.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented this solution by ourselves.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The problem with Cisco, from what I see, is that their costs are much higher. The costs depend on the features you need, and the license is expensive.
What other advice do I have?
From a functional and technical point of view, I would recommend Cisco Nexus to potential users.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cisco Nexus a nine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco Nexus
November 2024
Learn what your peers think about Cisco Nexus. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: November 2024.
816,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Practice Lead - Data Center Networking at a construction company with 5,001-10,000 employees
Performs well, good port flexibility, and scales out easily
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is performance."
- "There is an ongoing problem with the limitation of the TCAM table, which is that it doesn't have enough memory to allow you to be really granular with your policy."
What is our primary use case?
I am an engineer and work primarily with our data center network and data center security. The Nexus switch is a data center switch and I have a lot of recent experience with it. My company is a solution provider and this is one of the products that we sell to our clients.
What is most valuable?
The 9000 series works really well in the spine-and-leaf architecture and gives you capabilities up to 400 gig.
The most valuable feature is performance. Not many customers are using the 400 gig speed yet, but you do have flexibility as if you're going to run the ports at 10 gig, 40 gig, or 100 gig. That port flexibility is really important.
What needs improvement?
There is an ongoing problem with the limitation of the TCAM table, which is that it doesn't have enough memory to allow you to be really granular with your policy. Without enough memory, it requires manual manipulation if you exceed or get near to the TCAM limits. They have improved it, but in the early days, it took down some companies.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco products for many years and have experience with the Nexus line since it was first released.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
These switches are very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The spine-and-leaf architecture is very scalable. If you need more ports to plug servers in, you add more leaves. If you need more throughput then you add more spines.
All of the switches at the top are the spine, and those plug into those are the leaves, and then the servers plug into the leaves. It's highly scalable, because if you have more servers then just purchase two more switches. If you need more throughput and better performance, then you just purchase two switches for the spine. You can continue to scale out the model very simply.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
The Nexus 9000 platform is by far the best-selling and most popular, and there are a couple of reasons for that. It's less expensive than a 7K or 5K solution and in fact, we hardly sell the 5Ks anymore. The 9000 really works well in the spine-and-leaf, which is the current architecture.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is really straightforward and if you use ACI, running on top of the Nexus 9K, you don't really have to do anything but plug the switches in. The software manages all of the policy.
Without ACI, setup requires the use of the command line, which is the same as it's always been.
What about the implementation team?
The maintenance can be handled by one person or a small team.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The Nexus 9000 is very competitively priced.
What other advice do I have?
The Nexus Dashboard is a relatively new product that is in the portfolio for the data center. It hosts the multi-site orchestrator and has functionality for self-healing and self-optimizing of the data center network. It's Nexus' best work.
My advice for anybody who is considering this solution is that if you're looking to cut costs in the data center, there's not that big of a difference between a Cisco switch and other switches. But, when it comes to things like storage, between the most expensive and the least expensive, there's a lot of different pricing in there. So, I wouldn't cut costs on your switches. I would suggest looking at other areas where you can cut costs.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: partner
Network Engineer at Archer Daniels Midland
Helps us stay ahead in a field where uptime is crucial
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the Bluetooth console."
- "They need to offer fibre switches in the 9K series."
What is our primary use case?
Our primary use for this solution is as headend switches at remote sites.
How has it helped my organization?
These are the same as the old headend switches, but newer and nicer.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the Bluetooth console.
What needs improvement?
They need to offer fibre switches in the 9K series.
I would like to have the ability to identify ports by flashing port lights, so I can tell the user "We need to look at port four", and then I can flash the light remotely using the command line.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability of this solution is good.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
Scalability with this solution is easy.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support for this solution is good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We moved to this solution because it is an ever-growing field. You need to stay ahead, and uptime is crucial.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup of this solution is straightforward.
What about the implementation team?
We used AT&T to assist us with the implementation.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
AT&T is our primary vendor. Verizon was on the short list, and Cisco themselves was on the list as well.
What other advice do I have?
This is a good switch, overall, and there are only a few other features that we'd like to see.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Software Developer at Nebula
Easy to use and stable solution
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is easy."
- "There is room for improvement in the pricing. The solution is expensive. Compared to other vendors, it's costly for similar products."
What is most valuable?
The product is easy to use.
What needs improvement?
There is room for improvement in the pricing. The solution is expensive. Compared to other vendors, it's costly for similar products.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using this solution for five to six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The product is stable. It's a good product.
How are customer service and support?
We get technical support through a third-party vendor. So, we normally call the vendor, and then we need to escalate the issue.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is easy. For the current setup, we're just dealing with updates already.
What was our ROI?
What other advice do I have?
Overall, we are satisfied with this solution. We don't have any complaints.
I would rate the solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Sr Network Engineer at a government with 1,001-5,000 employees
Provides important redundancy for our new data center
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature is the HSRP (Hot Standby Router Protocol)."
- "I would like to see better collaboration with other, low-end devices."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for our new data center.
How has it helped my organization?
This solution has improved our redundancy.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature is the HSRP (Hot Standby Router Protocol).
What needs improvement?
I would like to see better collaboration with other, low-end devices.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I think that it scales well. For what we use it for, it has been great. Right now, we have a ten-gig network, but it can scale up to forty-gig, which is really good.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support for this solution is great.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Prior to this solution, we used ePlus. We switched in the move to newer technology.
What other advice do I have?
We have a vendor for products, but we do not just go with what they suggest. We do our homework, in-house, as well.
There are many good things about this product including the reliability, scalability, and of course, security. This is a product that I recommend.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Infrastructure Engineer at a healthcare company with 5,001-10,000 employees
A reliable solution with good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "The most valuable feature of this solution is its reliability."
- "We have encountered some software bugs."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution for our data center switches.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable feature of this solution is its reliability.
What needs improvement?
We have encountered some software bugs.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
I have a positive impression of the stability of this solution.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I'd say that this solution is very scalable.
How are customer service and technical support?
This solution has really good technical support. They generally respond by email, and it is really quick. They usually respond within a couple of hours.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I joined the company after this solution had been implemented.
How was the initial setup?
My understanding is that the initial setup was pretty straightforward.
What other advice do I have?
This is a really good product and something that I'm really familiar with. Anybody who has decided to implement this solution is making a good choice.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Network Adminstrator at a government with 501-1,000 employees
An easy to manage solution that will make up part of our 10-gigabit network
Pros and Cons
- "This solution has allowed us to better prepare our network for 10-gigabit."
- "My only complaint is that not all of the ports on it are enabled from the start."
What is our primary use case?
We use this solution as the fabric switches for our VMware environment.
How has it helped my organization?
This solution has allowed us to better prepare our network for 10-gigabit. Currently, we're a 1-gigabit network, but we have started expanding.
What is most valuable?
The most valuable features are that it is easy to manage and it is pretty stable.
What needs improvement?
My only complaint is that not all of the ports on it are enabled from the start. We pay for twenty-six ports, and we would have to license the other ports if we want to use them. This can get expensive as you expand more.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable solution and we haven't had any issues with it. The only time that we've ever rebooted is if we had to upgrade the firmware.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
We have not had any issues in terms of scalability. If we want to expand then we just have to pay to have additional ports enabled.
How are customer service and technical support?
Cisco has always been good for technical support. We put in a ticket and they call back. It's always been pretty straightforward.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We did not use a 10-gigabit solution prior to this. The purchase of this solution was driven by the fact that we needed 10-gigabit ports, and they go to all of our devices.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup was pretty straightforward. They had a couple of issues setting up the ports on the switches, but other than that it was pretty good.
What about the implementation team?
We used a reseller, IP Pathways, to assist with the deployment. They were ok, but some of the solutions they have implemented for us were not done in the best way.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Our licensing fees are approximately $2,000 USD per year.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We only use a couple of different vendors, and Cisco was our only option for this type of solution.
What other advice do I have?
My advice to anybody who is implementing this solution is to make sure that they have a vendor that knows how to set it up from the start.
This solution is easy to set up and we haven't had very many problems with it.
I would rate this solution a ten out of ten.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Nexus Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: November 2024
Popular Comparisons
NETGEAR Switches
Cisco Catalyst Switches
HPE ProCurve
Aruba Instant On Switches
ExtremeSwitching
Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch LAN Switches
Juniper QFabric
Cisco FabricPath
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco Nexus Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating LAN Switching, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Compatibility between Dell PowerConnect 6224 and Cisco SG500x (L3 switches)
- What are your recommended Layer 2 and Layer 3 network switches if the main consideration is performance?
- Does anyone have statistics on how often a fire occurs in a computer room?
- What LAN switching solution do you recommend?
- Managed vs Unmanaged Switches: What should a business take into account when choosing?
- Does FiberHome S6800 switch support bi-directional SFP modules and how to enable them?
- Can someone please help me with Fiberhome 40G S6800 Switches?