Cisco Nexus vs HPE ProCurve comparison

Cisco and Hewlett Packard Enterprise are both solutions in the LAN Switching category. Cisco is ranked #2 with an average rating of 8.7, while Hewlett Packard Enterprise is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.2. Cisco holds a 8.7% mindshare in LS, compared to Hewlett Packard Enterprise’s 12.2% mindshare. Additionally, 96% of Cisco users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 97% of Hewlett Packard Enterprise users who would recommend it.

Cisco Nexus

Read 104 Cisco Nexus reviews

1,898 Views
1,368 Comparison Views

96% willing to recommend

HPE ProCurve

Read 38 HPE ProCurve reviews

1,981 Views
1,713 Comparison Views

97% willing to recommend

Cisco Nexus

HPE ProCurve

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Cisco Nexus and HPE ProCurve based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out in this report how the two LAN Switching solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI.

To learn more, read our detailed Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve Report (Updated: January 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve

January 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 831,158 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Cisco Nexus

Ranking in LAN Switching

2nd

Average Rating

8.4

Reviews Sentiment

7.6

Number of Reviews

104

Ranking in other categories

Data Center Networking (3rd)

HPE ProCurve

Ranking in LAN Switching

4th

Average Rating

8.6

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Cisco Nexus is 8.7%, down from 11.5% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of HPE ProCurve is 12.2%, down from 13.8% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

LAN Switching

Featured Reviews

Joe Benítez

Systems Engineer at GAD Municipal de Guayaquil

Offer high performance capabilities and enables efficient data transmission and processing

Before Nexus, I used to have Catalyst 6500 switches. Those 6500 series chassis gave us a lot of problems. Too many problems, actually. And we had a Cisco ASA firewall blade within those chassis. And they were running outdated software. So, in fact, it was the firewall blade that caused us too many problems instead of the chassis. The chassis itself was working well and performing fine, but the firewall card was not suitable for our needs. That was one aspect. Additionally, those chassis had been in operation for more than five years. As we are a local government, we have a policy to renew hardware every five years. That's because we need to maintain all the hardware and software in the latest versions and keep up with the technology lifecycle of the technology we use.

Read full review

Sandeep Rajguru

Team Lead Manager at Tata Motors

Offers reliability and helps with vulnerability assessment

I use HPE ProCurve network in our organization. I can say that the product has improved the network flexibility in our company since I haven't seen any challenges from the last seven to eight years. The most valuable product for network management revolves around the area of VSB, also known as virtual switch bonding, which can quickly attach two or three switches or make them come together to quickly form a single switch. From a security perspective, my company does vulnerability assessment. From a security perspective, my company does vulnerability assessment. Following the hardening guidelines, the switches are configured according to the hardening parameters. The tool's reliability and uptime match our company's needs. My company enjoyed configuring the switches a lot, especially since we saw similarities between Cisco's and HPS's configuration processes. HPE ProCurve is user-friendly. We have a different product for network management, so my company doesn't use HPE ProCurve since we have already collaborated with some third-party products. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it. I recommend the product to those who plan to use it, especially since I have been using it without any issues for many years. I rate the tool a nine out of ten.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"In terms of stability, this solution is rock solid."

"It's easy to use, and the performance is great."

"Solid product, communications and support from a well-known dependable company."

"The most valuable features of the solution are capacity and scalability."

"The product's initial setup phase is very easy."

"The solution has introduced VPC, Virtual Port Channel, which allows for more redundancy and flexibility."

"We've found their tech support to be excellent, especially in their willingness to resolve issues promptly."

"The solution is very expensive. Currently, we pay an yearly licensing cost. I rate the pricing a nine out of ten."

More Cisco Nexus pros

"It has an excellent menu system where you can use both the CLI and a menu system and the GUI version. They have three options for manipulating, updating, and changing the switch, which we like."

"The solution is fast and inexpensive."

"It is easy to deploy."

"The pricing is quite competitive."

"The user interface is the most valuable aspect of the solution for us."

"The user interface is simple to use."

"This is a very reliable solution."

"The product's stability is good. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a ten out of ten."

More HPE ProCurve pros

Cons

"The licensing is very complicated. They should work to simplify it."

"One improvement needed is support for Multi-CAD scale that we were concerned about. We're not hitting any limits at this point."

"The initial setup was somewhat complex."

"As a device meant to lead the processes related to networking and troubleshooting, I feel both aspects can be described as areas with certain concerns where improvements are required."

"Cisco Nexus needs to add the SDN capability and lower the price."

"There are limitations on some of the lower level 9K solutions where you can't do the same things that you would normally be able to do, like for instance the number of static maps that you can configure on it."

"The product lacks options for integration with other market products that would allow us more flexibility."

"We lag on the configuration. The changes make a difference in troubleshooting."

More Cisco Nexus cons

"An area for improvement in HPE ProCurve is the web interface not being as robust because you still have to go to the COI to make modifications or look at the exact configuration."

"We do occasionally have issues with the solution and need to change out the switches sometimes. This can be due to the fan, but, in most cases, it's because the power supply was broken."

"HPE ProCurve is very complex for junior engineers and beginners. You need a lot of experience in managing switches in order to use this switch."

"They should learn from other vendors, such as Cisco. They all have a few specific routing features. HPE doesn't have any cheap BGP solution."

"The product must provide something similar to Cisco’s command-line interface."

"The dashboards could be improved to be more interesting."

"These switches can be made more stable and robust."

"Procurve would work better if it had more options like the web environment."

More HPE ProCurve cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"The license for Cisco Nexus is one year to three years, in this case for the SMARTnet. It is a price per unit, in terms of this specific appliance."

"Cisco Nexus is not a cheaply priced product."

"It's around $160K a year for our license."

"If you compare Cisco hardware to any other vendors, such as HPE, they are more expensive. There is a license to use the solution. If my customer's licenses are about to expire I receive notification from Cisco, this is very helpful."

"It's worth the money we're paying for Nexus."

"The problem with Cisco, from what I see, is that their costs are much higher."

"The solution is expensive."

"Every Cisco product is more expensive than competitors on the market, which is just a fact, but from my perspective, it is worth it."

More Cisco Nexus pricing and cost advice

"The licensing for HPE ProCurve is a one-time cost, though it's varied somewhat. What my company purchased was usually between $3,500 and $5,000 one-time cost."

"The product has a good price compared to other solutions."

"We have an annual support subscription."

"The price of this product is cheap."

"We are a public company, so we are obliged to take the best offer from the vendors. They gave us the best price for the needs we had. It was considerably less than Cisco. It had maybe 40% lower cost."

"The cost of HPE ProCurve is good."

"HPE ProCurve is competitively priced, with a difference of approximately 30 to 35% compared to other vendors"

"There is a license required to use HPE ProCurve."

More HPE ProCurve pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

26%

Financial Services Firm

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

Educational Organization

14%

Computer Software Company

12%

Comms Service Provider

Government

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Cisco Nexus?

The product's initial setup phase is very easy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cisco Nexus?

Cisco pricing is at the same level as many competitors, however, due to competition, they sometimes lower prices and offer large discounts.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cisco Nexus?

Cisco's security features are in line with other OEMs, however, for data center security in terms of layer seven security, we prefer to have different OEMs rather than relying solely on Cisco.

See all answers

What do you like most about HPE ProCurve?

It is easy to deploy.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for HPE ProCurve?

HPE ProCurve is competitively priced, with a difference of approximately 30 to 35% compared to other vendors like Cisco. This makes it a viable option for businesses with limited budgets, particula...

See all answers

What needs improvement with HPE ProCurve?

The product could improve scalability and support for advanced networking features. Including advanced interfaces like QSFP and enhanced support for AI-driven network solutions would make it more c...

See all answers

Comparisons

Juniper QFX Series Switches vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 44% of the time

Arista Networks Platform vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 22% of the time

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 16% of the time

ExtremeSwitching vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 4% of the time

Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch LAN Switches vs Cisco Nexus

Compared 3% of the time

More Cisco Nexus Competitors

Cisco Catalyst Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 52% of the time

Aruba Instant On Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 36% of the time

NETGEAR Switches vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 9% of the time

Cisco FabricPath vs HPE ProCurve

Compared 3% of the time

More HPE ProCurve Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus

January 2025

Download Cisco Nexus product report

Buyer's Guide

HPE ProCurve

January 2025

Download HPE ProCurve product report

Also Known As

No data available

ProCurve, HP ProCurve

Learn More

Cisco

Hewlett Packard Enterprise

Overview

The Cisco Nexus family of switches is designed to meet the stringent requirements of the next-generation data center. Not simply bigger or faster, these switches offer the following characteristics: infrastructure that can be scaled cost-effectively and that helps you increase energy, budget, and resource efficiency, transport that can navigate the transition to 10 Gigabit Ethernet and unified fabric and can also handle architectural changes such as virtualization, Web 2.0 applications, and cloud computing and operational continuity to meet your need for an environment where system availability is assumed and maintenance windows are rare if not totally extinct.

HP Networking (HP ProCurve) products enable a cost-effective network that's agile, flexible, and fully interoperable. Boost availability, performance, monitoring, and productivity with HP network software, services, and support.

Sample Customers

Advanced Medical Transport, Banco de Guayaquil, Baylor Scott & White Health, BH Telecom, Bowling Green State University, Calligaris, Children's Hospital Colorado, City of Biel, Del Papa Distributing, Department of Justice, Dimension Data, Dualtec Cloud Builders, Electricity Authority of Cyprus, Grupo Industrial Saltillo (GIS), Hertz, K&L Gates , LightEdge, Lone Star College System, Management Science Associates, Mindtree, NBC Olympics, Quest, Sony Corporation, The Department of Education in Western Australia, Valley Proteins

Borden Ladner Gervais LLP, Cardinal Newman Catholic Secondary School, DY 4 Systems, EdgeWing, Edmonton Public Schools District, Halton Catholic District School Board, Hartwick College, Hatch Associates, Huntingdon College, Roseville Joint Union High School District, Saddleback Valley Unified School District, One Superior Place

Buyer's Guide

Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve

January 2025

Free Report: Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve

Find out what your peers are saying about Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Cisco Nexus vs. HPE ProCurve report.

See our list of best LAN Switching vendors.

We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.