Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Nexus based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include NETGEAR Switches, Arista Networks Platform, and HPE ProCurve.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Netgear switches offer affordability and ease of setup, appealing to budget-conscious small businesses. In comparison, Cisco Nexus provides advanced data center features, justifying its higher cost for enterprises prioritizing high-speed performance and virtualization, despite complex licensing issues.
NETGEAR Switches have a lower setup cost, making them more budget-friendly, while Cisco Nexus involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
NETGEAR Switches have a lower setup cost, making them more budget-friendly, while Cisco Nexus involves a higher initial investment, reflecting its advanced features and capabilities.
Arista Networks Platform is favored for its cost-to-performance ratio, ease of configuration, and CloudVision management, appealing to data centers needing scalability. In comparison, Cisco Nexus offers a superior feature set with speed and flexibility, though it involves higher costs and complex licensing.
HPE ProCurve excels in pricing and support, appealing to budget-conscious buyers with strong customer service. In comparison, Cisco Nexus stands out with advanced features and superior scalability, ideal for complex environments requiring high performance and automation.
HPE ProCurve has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Nexus, making it a budget-friendly choice. Cisco Nexus, with its higher setup cost, offers advanced features suitable for enterprises.
HPE ProCurve has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco Nexus, making it a budget-friendly choice. Cisco Nexus, with its higher setup cost, offers advanced features suitable for enterprises.
Cisco Nexus offers advanced features and superior reliability, ideal for versatile network setups. In comparison, Juniper QFX Series provides excellent port density and power efficiency, appealing to buyers focusing on cost-effectiveness and energy savings while maintaining robust Layer 3 fabric scalability.
Cisco Nexus offers advanced features like VDCs and VRF, ideal for complex networks, but might be complex and costly. In comparison, Aruba Instant On provides simplicity and affordability, suitable for small businesses needing ease of management with essential networking functions.
ExtremeSwitching offers features like deep packet inspection and robust scalability, making it cost-effective for smaller enterprises. In comparison, Cisco Nexus provides high-speed and redundancy options ideal for data centers, although at a higher cost with complex licensing.
Cisco Nexus excels in versatility and high-performance switching, making it ideal for data centers. In comparison, Juniper MX Series is favored for robust routing and flexibility, suitable for service providers and enterprises. Both offer unique integration and support options tailored to diverse networking needs.
Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch is favored for its cost-effective deployment and robust support, appealing to budget-conscious networks. In comparison, Cisco Nexus offers advanced features and scalability, attracting large-scale operations despite the higher initial investment due to its superior capabilities in complex IT environments.
Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch LAN Switches offer lower setup costs, making them a budget-friendly option, while Cisco Nexus incurs higher initial costs due to its advanced features and capabilities.
Alcatel-Lucent OmniSwitch LAN Switches offer lower setup costs, making them a budget-friendly option, while Cisco Nexus incurs higher initial costs due to its advanced features and capabilities.
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series attracts tech buyers with cost-effectiveness and ease of deployment, suitable for those prioritizing budget and simplicity. In comparison, Cisco Nexus appeals to those needing advanced features and scalability, justifying its higher investment with superior performance for complex environments.
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series offers lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Nexus involves higher expenses, reflecting its advanced features.
Dell PowerSwitch N-Series offers lower setup costs, making it budget-friendly, while Cisco Nexus involves higher expenses, reflecting its advanced features.
Juniper QFabric appeals with its flat architecture enhancing performance and simplifying management. In comparison, Cisco Nexus offers extensive features supporting virtualization and security. Cisco Nexus's flexibility and support outweigh QFabric's initial cost benefits, urging tech buyers to consider long-term ROI.
Arista Campus LAN Switches offer cost-effective solutions prioritizing ease of use and quick setup, making them attractive for budget-conscious buyers. In comparison, Cisco Nexus provides advanced features and robust functionality, appealing to enterprises seeking comprehensive networking capabilities and strategic long-term investments.
Arista Campus LAN Switches offer a lower setup cost, while Cisco Nexus comes with a higher initial investment. The price difference highlights Arista as a more budget-friendly option compared to Cisco's premium pricing structure.
Arista Campus LAN Switches offer a lower setup cost, while Cisco Nexus comes with a higher initial investment. The price difference highlights Arista as a more budget-friendly option compared to Cisco's premium pricing structure.
