Arista Networks Platform and Cisco Nexus compete in the networking solutions category. Arista has the upper hand in ease of deployment due to a unified operating system, while Cisco Nexus offers more extensive configurability and robust features.
Features: Arista Networks Platform provides a Linux shell for troubleshooting, a unified operating system across all models, and the efficient CloudVision management system. Cisco Nexus offers powerful features like Virtual Device Contexts (VDCs), Virtual Port Channels (VPC), and high flexibility in network configuration.
Room for Improvement: Users of Arista desire improved documentation and integration with third-party solutions, better price strategies, and enhanced security features. Cisco Nexus faces challenges with documentation clarity, complex licensing models, and the need for more streamlined management tools.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Arista excels in ease of deployment due to its uniform operating system, making it accessible for large networks. Cisco Nexus, while known for solid customer service, can pose complexities in deployment due to its extensive features and less comprehensive documentation.
Pricing and ROI: Arista is generally more expensive, impacting its adoption in budget-sensitive markets, but offers high ROI through operational efficiencies. Cisco Nexus also carries a higher price, but users find its feature set and reliability justify the cost, with competitive pricing achieved through discounts and bundling.
Speeding up our response times and reducing errors and incidents with automation and available APIs.
They provide instant support and maintain commitments regarding replacement products.
According to my team’s feedback, we receive extended support from the Arista team.
Scalability is a key feature of Arista, owing to the possibilities to manage the entire data center network from a single console.
Initially, the stability of Cisco Nexus, particularly with the ACI, was problematic due to unstable codes, requiring replacements.
Feature-wise, it addresses most customer requirements.
Arista Networks is currently less popular as they were initially more focused on data centers than campus networks.
When I talk about data centers, which are critical infrastructure and centralized application hubs, the Nexus platforms should be highly stable.
Compared to Cisco, Arista routers are significantly cheaper.
Arista products are perceived as costly, especially compared to competitors like Cisco.
The price of Cisco Nexus is on the higher side due to the premium services Cisco offers.
Features include plug-and-play auto-discovery, allowing centralized configuration and management.
The most valuable features of Arista include low latency, scalability, and sustainability of the products.
The VPC feature of Cisco Nexus is great because it provides an active-active way of forwarding the traffic and avoids blocking any of the links.
Arista Networks Platform is a stable and reliable solution for data center features, specifically for non-blocking switches used for spine-leaf connectivity with servers hooked to these switches. It also provides multi-layer switches for client networks, particularly in the banking sector.
Arista products are preferred for their stability, good hardware, ease of adoption and configuration, responsive and helpful support, and high throughput ratings. The solution has helped prevent screen loss and business outages in the media industry and is designed for next-generation data centers.
We monitor all Data Center Networking reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.