

HPE ProCurve and Cisco Catalyst Switches are competitive options in the networking solutions market. HPE ProCurve holds an advantage in pricing and warranty, while Cisco Catalyst is preferred for its comprehensive feature set.
Features: HPE ProCurve provides a lifetime warranty, robust design, and centralized management capabilities. Users appreciate its intuitive CLI and competitive pricing. Cisco Catalyst is favored for VLAN routing, PoE, and robust security measures, offering ease of configuration and high performance.
Room for Improvement: HPE ProCurve could enhance its web interface, expand feature offerings, and improve tool integration. Cisco Catalyst could lower pricing, simplify license management, and enhance GUI features.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: HPE ProCurve offers straightforward deployment and robust customer support, suitable for flexible deployment options. Cisco Catalyst provides solid deployment ease but is associated with high setup and licensing costs, with mixed feedback on technical support.
Pricing and ROI: HPE ProCurve is seen as cost-effective, providing value through competitive pricing and a high return on investment. Its lifetime warranty improves its value proposition. Cisco Catalyst, although more expensive with complex licensing, offers value and long-term reliability through its advanced features.
From an investment standpoint, deploying Cisco Catalyst Switches offers tangible benefits, including cost reductions.
When requesting an RMA, they replace defective items in just one day.
On a scale from one to 10, I would rate the technical support of Cisco at 10 out of 10.
Cisco support is very good and responsive.
The need to frequently contact support suggests we are not getting sufficient effectiveness from the service.
The scalability of Cisco Catalyst Switches is very much scalable, as it supports the stacking feature and growth; for instance, with 94K modular switches, based on the requirement, we can even increase modules for more bandwidth.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are scalable, and I would rate them eight to nine out of ten for scalability.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are stable.
It is 60 to 70% stable, depending on usage intensity.
Currently, I don't see much AI integration with Cisco Catalyst Switches; though they've started, it still needs improvement.
It is the highest cost in the market.
Cisco Catalyst Switches could be a little bit cheaper as they are very costly.
When running bots, the system occasionally gets stuck, requiring reboots which result in memory loss and data loss.
Cisco provides unique features that justify their pricing.
Cisco usually is costly compared to other vendors.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are quite pricey.
For market-related sites, AWS pricing becomes significantly higher compared to DigitalOcean.
Cisco Catalyst Switches are valuable for their reliability and performance.
The most beneficial features for our network management are their stability and good customer support.
Catalyst Switches are efficient and swift, which is valuable for my organization.
It offers easy scalability and migration between different configurations.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco Catalyst Switches | 22.8% |
| HPE ProCurve | 11.6% |
| Other | 65.6% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 79 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 29 |
| Large Enterprise | 79 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 18 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 10 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Cisco Catalyst Switches are a reliable and scalable network switching and routing solution, focusing on VLANs and VLAN switching. They are used as access switches, distribution switches, and core switches in various environments, deployed on-premises, and used for long connections. The switches are easy to configure, install, and upgrade and offer good pricing.
The most valuable features include warranty and firmware support, stability, security, good performance, flexibility, etc. The Cisco Catalyst Switches have provided a stable solution for the organizations and are widely used, trusted, and well-known in the networking industry.
We monitor all LAN Switching reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.