Cisco Catalyst Switches vs ExtremeSwitching comparison

ExtremeSwitching and Cisco Catalyst Switches compete in the networking solutions category, catering to both small businesses and large enterprises. Cisco appears to have an edge due to its comprehensive security features and strong integration support in complex environments, despite higher costs.

Features: ExtremeSwitching is known for its ease of use, scalability, and unique protocol features like ring topology and inspection firewalls. Its competitive pricing attracts smaller businesses. Cisco Catalyst Switches are favored for their extensive security features, integration capabilities, and support for PoE and stackability, making them ideal for enterprise environments.

Room for Improvement: ExtremeSwitching can improve by expanding training resources and addressing pricing concerns. Users find it challenging when transitioning from Cisco. Cisco Catalyst Switches face criticism for high pricing and complex licensing. Users seek more flexible pricing and easier third-party integration.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: ExtremeSwitching provides diverse deployment options with easy scalability, yet its support model needs enhancements. Cisco Catalyst Switches offer robust on-premises deployments with timely and responsive customer support, backed by an extensive knowledge base.

Pricing and ROI: ExtremeSwitching offers budget-friendly pricing with non-subscription models, appealing to smaller enterprises. Cisco Catalyst Switches are priced higher, justified by their reliability and feature set, appealing to larger enterprises despite costly licensing and support.