Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Aruba Instant On Switches vs Cisco Catalyst Switches comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive Summary

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

Aruba Instant On Switches
Ranking in LAN Switching
3rd
Average Rating
8.4
Reviews Sentiment
6.5
Number of Reviews
27
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Cisco Catalyst Switches
Ranking in LAN Switching
1st
Average Rating
8.6
Reviews Sentiment
6.9
Number of Reviews
173
Ranking in other categories
Ethernet Switches (7th), Data Center Networking (1st), AV Over IP Switching (1st)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of January 2025, in the LAN Switching category, the mindshare of Aruba Instant On Switches is 10.2%, up from 8.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cisco Catalyst Switches is 30.6%, down from 31.7% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
LAN Switching
 

Featured Reviews

MashukThakur - PeerSpot reviewer
A centrally managed switches ideal for small and medium businesses but does not have any console access
The solution does not have any console access. For example, if you do not have internet access on your side and you need to configure anything, you should at least have CLI access to do something or manage the solution to put to some IP. It will only work if we have a TSCT on the network. We can port and configure the initial settings before we get the Instant On Switches. I am not working deeply on Instant On devices. I have only installed it in a couple of accommodation sites. Even today, one customer has ordered to install 80 pieces of Instant On. I’ve to order additional 94 access points. I was confused about whether to go with Aruba Instant On or AP-505. Instant On has limited accessibility but AP-505 have cloud or local access on normal infrastructure. This would be better and easier to configure. So, there are further improvements in regard to console access and some limitations with access.
SameerBali - PeerSpot reviewer
Reliable and stable catalyst switch; can be easily installed
I like Cisco Catalyst Switches because most of the time, we can do what we want with the product. Cisco has good guidelines that enable us to implement anything, so we can have a multiple ability product on most of the network equipment worldwide. Cisco has communities or forums that help us implement more complicated areas in terms of network, so in addition, Cisco is not just a network equipment company, because they provide us most of the solutions, development, protocols, and new technologies, more than any other company in the world. I also like the availability of Cisco Catalyst Switches, including scalability and reliability. You can find all these in this product.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"We use Aruba Instant On Switches for general communication, sending files, and going to the internet."
"The product's initial setup phase is very simple."
"Aruba's management solutions, like Aruba Central are valuable."
"Its customer service is good."
"The solution's pricing is slightly cheaper than that of Cisco."
"The stability is fine. I would rate the stability a nine out of ten. Almost a ten on a ten."
"The online monitoring tool and the configuration of the application with the tool are valuable features."
"The dashboard for clients is very nice."
"The configuration is easy."
"The benefit of the tool is that it is a stable product."
"As there are many who are knowledgeable of this technology, this translates into extensive support for it."
"We have dealt with Cisco's technical support in the past. They were especially helpful and very polite. They are always there if we need them and their insights are always excellent. I would say that we have been satisfied with the level of support we've gotten so far."
"Cisco Switches are more stable in terms of hardware and firmware, rather than Juniper Switches."
"It is a stable and good product. It is also easy to install."
"It is easy to use."
"The scalability is excellent."
 

Cons

"The product's startup speed is very bad, as it is very slow."
"It is not a very scalable solution."
"They could provide additional uplink ports, such as eight instead of four. It will be beneficial for our use case."
"The solution’s GUI should be improved a bit."
"The price has room for improvement."
"The support needs improvement."
"Instant On Switches' layer 3 and visibility could be improved."
"The product must be integrated with Aruba Central for better management."
"Its price can be improved. Some devices can be very expensive."
"We have configurations for port channels between two facilities, and we cannot communicate between these two buildings. An SFP configuration uses one wire to send and receive the signal. It's opt-in. We cannot use it after the upgrade. What can we do in this situation? We already bought it."
"They need to implement sFlow."
"The solution could improve by having a video IP feature."
"Reporting could be improved as well as integration possibilities with other platforms."
"The technical response could be faster in the future."
"The GUI should be addressed."
"Their centralized management could be better. There should be some kind of software for centralized management so that I don't need somebody else to manage it."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"If one is very bad, and ten is a very good price, I rate the tool's price as a six."
"The pricing is cheap."
"It is an expensive solution."
"Aruba Instant On Switches is slightly cheaper than Cisco."
"The license for Instant On Switches is free."
"The solution is the cheapest A-class switch."
"The pricing is quite low compared to other products, which is good for the customer."
"We pay an annual licensing fee."
"The price of Cisco equipment is very expensive and you have to pay extra for support."
"The pricing of Cisco Catalyst Switches could be better in general. There is an annual license required."
"The price of the solution is expensive compared to other products from America or Europe. They should have more competitive pricing."
"We pay the licensing fees annually because we have an enterprise license agreement."
"The general price of the solution could be cheaper."
"Cisco Catalyst Switches is an affordable solution."
"Catalyst Switches are costly. When I started working with them 25 years ago, prices were a problem too."
"It is overpriced. Some devices can be very expensive. Most of the clients have a contract with Cisco for two or three years."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which LAN Switching solutions are best for your needs.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
Computer Software Company
18%
Manufacturing Company
11%
Educational Organization
8%
Comms Service Provider
7%
Educational Organization
64%
Computer Software Company
7%
Government
3%
Financial Services Firm
3%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about Aruba Instant On Switches?
The solution has a simple deployment and zero border.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aruba Instant On Switches?
If one is very bad, and ten is a very good price, I rate the tool's price as a six.
What needs improvement with Aruba Instant On Switches?
The difficulty with the tool is in the area of troubleshooting. The problem that we have in our company is that the switches don't get connected properly. In the future, I want to see AI in the too...
Would you recommend replacing a Cisco Catalyst Switch by a D-link one?
Hello Mesfin It depends on the real scenario, the cisco 2960 is a very good device and they usually have routing functions but there are many different models within the same 2960 line, and on the ...
What do you like most about Cisco Catalyst Switches?
We are a vendor for the healthcare sector, especially hospitals, and normally, we use a full Cisco solution for stability, especially for the stability of the Access Points and the security of swit...
 

Also Known As

Aruba Instant On 1930 Switches
Cisco Catalyst, Catalyst
 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

KEMET, Vestavia Hills City Schools, Dropbox
Afni, Anilana Hotels and Resorts, Baylor Scott & White Health, Beachbody, Bellevue, Del Papa Distributing, Explorer Pipeline, Mindtree, Omaha World Herald, Radio 538, Sony Corporation, Telecom Italia, Telenor Arena
Find out what your peers are saying about Aruba Instant On Switches vs. Cisco Catalyst Switches and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
831,158 professionals have used our research since 2012.