Top 10 Cisco Security Cloud Control Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco

4.1 out of 5

15 reviews
100% willing to recommend

Top Cisco Security Cloud Control Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Security Cloud Control based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include AlgoSec, Tufin Orchestration Suite, and Fortinet FortiGate Cloud. The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Cisco Security Cloud Control surpasses its competitors by offering robust threat detection, advanced data protection, and seamless integration across cloud environments, ensuring comprehensive security management and streamlined operations for enterprises seeking superior protection.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.

Get the alternatives report

AlgoSec

4.5 out of 5

AlgoSec

4.5 out of 5

AlgoSec excels in policy optimization, risk analysis, and regulatory compliance, making it ideal for security-focused environments. In comparison, Cisco Security Cloud Control provides seamless integration within the Cisco ecosystem, offering centralized management and layered security, appealing to organizations centered on Cisco infrastructure.

Download AlgoSec vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control Report

Pricing

AlgoSec excels in easy setup with minimal costs, whereas Cisco Security Cloud Control involves a complex and pricey installation. While AlgoSec prioritizes affordability, Cisco focuses on a comprehensive setup experience.

View comparison

Pricing

Tufin Orchestration Suite

4.0 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite

4.0 out of 5

Tufin Orchestration Suite excels in automating firewall management with robust compliance features and centralized control in complex environments. In comparison, Cisco Security Cloud Control provides centralized management across Cisco security solutions, appealing to businesses invested in Cisco's ecosystem for efficient network security.

Download Cisco Security Cloud Control vs. Tufin Orchestration Suite Report

Pricing

The Tufin Orchestration Suite involves a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Security Cloud Control, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

The Tufin Orchestration Suite involves a higher setup cost compared to Cisco Security Cloud Control, highlighting a key difference in initial investment between the two solutions.

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud

4.2 out of 5

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud emphasizes comprehensive security with ease of management and integration. In comparison, Cisco Security Cloud Control centralizes device management with extensive device integration. Fortinet's deployment flexibility contrasts with Cisco's focused integration; Fortinet is cost-effective, while Cisco benefits environments invested in Cisco hardware.

Download Cisco Security Cloud Control vs. Fortinet FortiGate Cloud Report

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers a straightforward setup process with competitive pricing, while Cisco Security Cloud Control has a higher initial setup cost.

View comparison

Pricing

Fortinet FortiGate Cloud offers a straightforward setup process with competitive pricing, while Cisco Security Cloud Control has a higher initial setup cost.

FireMon Security Manager

4.1 out of 5

FireMon Security Manager

4.1 out of 5

FireMon excels in policy management with detailed analytics and multi-vendor support, ideal for complex environments. In comparison, Cisco Security Cloud Control offers seamless integration with Cisco infrastructure, appealing to buyers within Cisco-heavy ecosystems seeking automated threat responses and rapid security management.

Download Cisco Security Cloud Control vs. FireMon Security Manager Report

Pricing

FireMon Security Manager has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Security Cloud Control, highlighting a considerable initial investment disparity between the two solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

FireMon Security Manager has a higher initial setup cost compared to Cisco Security Cloud Control, highlighting a considerable initial investment disparity between the two solutions.

Palo Alto Networks Panorama

4.2 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks Panorama

4.2 out of 5

Palo Alto Networks Panorama excels in centralized firewall management, offering seamless policy deployment and application awareness. In comparison, Cisco Security Cloud Control integrates security services with automated workflows. Tech buyers might choose Panorama for integration and management, while selecting Cisco for automation and comprehensive features.

Download Cisco Security Cloud Control vs. Palo Alto Networks Panorama Report

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers a reduced setup cost, while Cisco Security Cloud Control tends to have a higher initial expenditure.

View comparison

Pricing

Palo Alto Networks Panorama offers a reduced setup cost, while Cisco Security Cloud Control tends to have a higher initial expenditure.

Azure Firewall Manager

4.1 out of 5

Azure Firewall Manager

4.1 out of 5

Cisco Security Cloud Control offers centralized operations, automation, and detailed security configuration for Cisco devices. In comparison, Azure Firewall Manager offers integration with Azure's ecosystem, supporting hub and spoke architecture and consistent policy application. Buyers may value Cisco's device management or Azure's ecosystem integration.

Download Azure Firewall Manager vs. Cisco Security Cloud Control Report

Pricing

Cisco Security Cloud Control incurs a moderate initial setup cost, while Azure Firewall Manager demands a higher upfront investment, spotlighting a significant pricing distinction between the two firewall management solutions.

View comparison

Pricing

Related categories

Firewall Security Management

Microsoft Security Suite