Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users
Cisco Threat Grid Logo

Top 10 Cisco Threat Grid Alternatives

Vendor: Cisco
3.8 out of 5
Post review

Top Cisco Threat Grid Competitors

Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco Threat Grid based on the interviews we conducted with its users. The top alternative solutions include CrowdStrike Falcon, Recorded Future, and ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP). The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.

Cisco Alternatives Report

Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Get the alternatives report
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
CrowdStrike Falcon
4.3 out of 5
CrowdStrike Falcon excels in affordable pricing and support with fast cloud deployment, attracting cost-conscious enterprises. In comparison, Cisco Threat Grid offers superior threat analysis and deep integration, ideal for organizations prioritizing comprehensive threat intelligence and benefiting from Cisco's extensive support network.
Download Cisco Threat Grid vs. CrowdStrike Falcon Report
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is minimal, allowing for quick deployment, while Cisco Threat Grid presents a higher initial investment but offers comprehensive features for advanced security needs.
View comparison
Pricing
CrowdStrike Falcon's setup cost is minimal, allowing for quick deployment, while Cisco Threat Grid presents a higher initial investment but offers comprehensive features for advanced security needs.
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
Recorded Future
4.2 out of 5
Recorded Future offers detailed threat intelligence reports and predictive analytics, aiding users in anticipating threats. In comparison, Cisco Threat Grid excels in malware analysis with robust sandboxing features. Cisco Threat Grid's pricing is competitive, while Recorded Future's advanced threat forecasting delivers substantial ROI despite higher costs.
Download Cisco Threat Grid vs. Recorded Future Report
Recorded Future has no setup costs, whereas Cisco Threat Grid involves a setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Recorded Future has no setup costs, whereas Cisco Threat Grid involves a setup fee.
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP)
4.2 out of 5
ThreatConnect TIP is appreciated for its robust automation and seamless integration with other security tools. In comparison, Cisco Threat Grid excels in advanced malware analysis and sandboxing. ThreatConnect TIP is noted for its smooth deployment, while Cisco Threat Grid offers specialized malware analysis, justifying its cost.
Download Cisco Threat Grid vs. ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) Report
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has higher setup costs compared to Cisco Threat Grid, with users noting significant initial investments for TIP while appreciating Threat Grid's more cost-effective implementation.
Watch a demo
View comparison
Pricing
ThreatConnect Threat Intelligence Platform (TIP) has higher setup costs compared to Cisco Threat Grid, with users noting significant initial investments for TIP while appreciating Threat Grid's more cost-effective implementation.
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
ReversingLabs
4.6 out of 5
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
ReversingLabs
4.6 out of 5
ReversingLabs offers strong data analytics and integrated threat intelligence. In comparison, Cisco Threat Grid excels in automation and integration capabilities. Tech buyers may select ReversingLabs for its detailed insights into malware behavior, while Cisco Threat Grid appeals for its collaborative threat hunting and seamless integration.
Download Cisco Threat Grid vs. ReversingLabs Report
ReversingLabs has a lower initial setup cost compared to Cisco Threat Grid. However, Cisco Threat Grid's setup process is more streamlined and quicker.
View comparison
Pricing
ReversingLabs has a lower initial setup cost compared to Cisco Threat Grid. However, Cisco Threat Grid's setup process is more streamlined and quicker.
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence
4.2 out of 5
Cisco Threat Grid excels in advanced analysis and seamless integration, valued for its competitive pricing. In comparison, Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence offers a vast threat database and automated response, worth the higher cost for its scalability and superior customer service.
Download Cisco Threat Grid vs. Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence Report
The setup cost for Cisco Threat Grid is higher compared to the more affordable Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence.
View comparison
Pricing
The setup cost for Cisco Threat Grid is higher compared to the more affordable Microsoft Defender Threat Intelligence.
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
Cisco Threat Grid Logo
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus
3.9 out of 5
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus excels in threat intelligence and integration with other Palo Alto products. In comparison, Cisco Threat Grid provides advanced malware analysis and automatic updates. AutoFocus requires minimal deployment time, while Threat Grid offers high ROI for complex needs. AutoFocus is cost-effective; Threat Grid is scalable.
Download Cisco Threat Grid vs. Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus Report
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is known for a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco Threat Grid offers a more flexible and lower-priced setup fee.
View comparison
Pricing
Palo Alto Networks AutoFocus is known for a higher initial setup cost, while Cisco Threat Grid offers a more flexible and lower-priced setup fee.

Related categories

Threat Intelligence Platforms
Security Information and Event Management (SIEM)
Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)