Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco UCS B-Series based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include HPE Synergy, HPE BladeSystem, and Dell PowerEdge M.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels in scalability and virtualization capabilities, offering efficient system management and reduced cabling. In comparison, HPE Synergy provides composability for flexible resource allocation and modular design. Cisco offers strong networking performance; however, HPE emphasizes simplified infrastructure management.
The setup cost for Cisco UCS B-Series is often noted as high due to its comprehensive infrastructure, while HPE Synergy is praised for a more flexible pricing model, allowing for gradual investment in modular components.
The setup cost for Cisco UCS B-Series is often noted as high due to its comprehensive infrastructure, while HPE Synergy is praised for a more flexible pricing model, allowing for gradual investment in modular components.
HPE BladeSystem provides excellent configurability and stability, making it ideal for virtual desktop and server hosting. In comparison, Cisco UCS B-Series excels in centralized management and robust virtualization integration, offering scalability for growing demands in IT environments.
Cisco UCS B-Series offers scalability and virtualization integration, ideal for large-scale environments with Cisco's centralized management. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge M emphasizes ease of management and cost-effectiveness, supporting diverse applications and offering security with competitive pricing, suitable for medium-level solutions.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels in integration and efficient virtualization. In comparison, HPE Superdome X provides superior scalability suitable for extensive enterprise setups. Cisco is ideal for easy deployments, whereas HPE offers specialized support for scaling complex workloads in large environments.
Supermicro SuperBlade appeals with high-density computing and efficient power use for data-heavy tasks. In comparison, Cisco UCS B-Series enhances management with seamless networking integration, offering an advanced feature set. Supermicro's affordability and customer service are compelling, while Cisco's automation and ecosystem compatibility attract long-term investors.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels with scaling flexibility, automation, and hybrid cloud deployment, ideal for organizations needing powerful and centralized management. In comparison, Lenovo Flex System delivers performance and user-friendliness, appealing to those who prioritize competitive pricing and substantial in-blade resources.
PowerEdge C is valued for efficient architecture, reduced power consumption, and user-friendly management tools. In comparison, Cisco UCS B-Series excels in scalability, with tight virtualization and storage integration, offering centralized management ideal for large-scale virtual environments.
PowerEdge C setup costs tend to be lower, attracting budget-conscious users, while Cisco UCS B-Series often involves higher initial investment, suitable for enterprises seeking robust capabilities.
PowerEdge C setup costs tend to be lower, attracting budget-conscious users, while Cisco UCS B-Series often involves higher initial investment, suitable for enterprises seeking robust capabilities.
