Discover the top alternatives and competitors to Cisco UCS B-Series based on the interviews we conducted with its users.
The top alternative solutions include HPE Synergy, Dell PowerEdge MX- Series, and HPE BladeSystem.
The alternatives are sorted based on how often peers compare the solutions.
Cisco Alternatives Report
Learn what solutions real users are comparing with Cisco, and compare use cases, valuable features, and pricing.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels in scalability and virtualization capabilities, offering efficient system management and reduced cabling. In comparison, HPE Synergy provides composability for flexible resource allocation and modular design. Cisco offers strong networking performance; however, HPE emphasizes simplified infrastructure management.
The setup cost for Cisco UCS B-Series is often noted as high due to its comprehensive infrastructure, while HPE Synergy is praised for a more flexible pricing model, allowing for gradual investment in modular components.
The setup cost for Cisco UCS B-Series is often noted as high due to its comprehensive infrastructure, while HPE Synergy is praised for a more flexible pricing model, allowing for gradual investment in modular components.
Cisco UCS B-Series is ideal for centralized management and virtualization integration despite its complexity. In comparison, Dell PowerEdge MX-Series offers flexibility and easier management. Cisco's deployment versatility outshines Dell's, while Dell provides competitive pricing. Cisco's superior support contrasts with Dell's regional limitations.
HPE BladeSystem provides excellent configurability and stability, making it ideal for virtual desktop and server hosting. In comparison, Cisco UCS B-Series excels in centralized management and robust virtualization integration, offering scalability for growing demands in IT environments.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels in integration and efficient virtualization. In comparison, HPE Superdome X provides superior scalability suitable for extensive enterprise setups. Cisco is ideal for easy deployments, whereas HPE offers specialized support for scaling complex workloads in large environments.
Supermicro SuperBlade attracts buyers with cost-effective pricing and efficient performance. In comparison, Cisco UCS B-Series, while more expensive, appeals through its advanced features and robust management capabilities, making it ideal for organizations prioritizing long-term value and extensive virtualization support.
Supermicro SuperBlade offers lower setup costs compared to Cisco UCS B-Series, making it a budget-friendly option, while the Cisco UCS B-Series provides a more comprehensive feature set that may justify its higher initial investment for some users.
Supermicro SuperBlade offers lower setup costs compared to Cisco UCS B-Series, making it a budget-friendly option, while the Cisco UCS B-Series provides a more comprehensive feature set that may justify its higher initial investment for some users.
Cisco UCS B-Series is ideal for businesses needing flexible integration and simplified management. In comparison, HPE NonStop prioritizes reliability with its fault-tolerant architecture, appealing to industries requiring continuous uptime and high availability in mission-critical operations. Pricing and support cater to different strategic goals.
Cisco UCS B-Series setup costs are lower and offer straightforward installation, while HPE NonStop has a higher initial cost due to its specialized infrastructure.
Cisco UCS B-Series setup costs are lower and offer straightforward installation, while HPE NonStop has a higher initial cost due to its specialized infrastructure.
Dell PowerEdge C-Series is known for its efficient virtualization with Intel Xeon sockets and tool-less maintenance. In comparison, Cisco UCS B-Series offers centralized management with Service Profiles and robust scalability through Fabric Interconnects, ideal for enterprises seeking advanced networking capabilities.
Dell PowerEdge C-Series has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco UCS B-Series, providing a cost-effective option for businesses upfront, while Cisco UCS B-Series offers advanced features that may justify its higher initial setup expense.
Dell PowerEdge C-Series has a lower setup cost compared to Cisco UCS B-Series, providing a cost-effective option for businesses upfront, while Cisco UCS B-Series offers advanced features that may justify its higher initial setup expense.
Cisco UCS B-Series excels with scaling flexibility, automation, and hybrid cloud deployment, ideal for organizations needing powerful and centralized management. In comparison, Lenovo Flex System delivers performance and user-friendliness, appealing to those who prioritize competitive pricing and substantial in-blade resources.
Cisco UCS B-Series appeals to enterprises prioritizing advanced integration and scalability. In comparison, Intel MFSYS25 offers a cost-effective solution with simplified architecture for businesses with budget constraints. Cisco provides robust support, whereas Intel emphasizes ease of deployment and quick ROI.
Cisco UCS B-Series presents a higher setup cost compared to Intel MFSYS25, reflecting its advanced capabilities and scalability, whereas Intel MFSYS25 offers a more budget-friendly setup with its efficient and simpler configuration.
Cisco UCS B-Series presents a higher setup cost compared to Intel MFSYS25, reflecting its advanced capabilities and scalability, whereas Intel MFSYS25 offers a more budget-friendly setup with its efficient and simpler configuration.
