We use it in our data center. In our infrastructure, we virtualize our servers.
IT Infrastructure Manager at a tech company with 11-50 employees
A user-friendly server that's easy to configure and manage
Pros and Cons
- "I like that it's very manageable very easy to use and configure. I am not an expert, but the graphic user interface is quite simple very easy to use. It's a complete solution."
- "We have to have Java to manage the infrastructure. It would be great if we can manage the infrastructure through a web browser."
What is our primary use case?
What is most valuable?
I like that it's very manageable very easy to use and configure. I am not an expert, but the graphic user interface is quite simple very easy to use. It's a complete solution.
What needs improvement?
We have to have Java to manage the infrastructure. It would be great if we can manage the infrastructure through a web browser.
We have Dell EMC, and I would like to connect my product directly to the chassis. I would like to have an interface to integrate the storage directly chassis and not through the network. If that could be possible, that would be great for me.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been using Cisco UCS B200 since 2015.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS B-Series
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Cisco UCS B-Series. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We haven't had any problem or any outage, and it's always running. Every process and everything you run, memory and cache memory, is always running. It's very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I think it's very scalable. I have an opportunity to provide for more Blade Servers, and if I need more power or resources, I just have to provide the Blade Servers. Right now, we have two administrators.
How are customer service and support?
When we had a problem once with a virtual server, our Cisco partner came to us within three hours and provided support. It was very good.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
We have stand-alone servers, and we used Dell Servers. For example, we installed VMware on top of the server. When we needed more power or infrastructure that's a little bit easier to buy, we bought this Cisco UCS platform.
How was the initial setup?
I don't know if it was straightforward because our partner set up and deployed this solution. It took about 20 days to implement this solution.
What about the implementation team?
We received the infrastructure entirely configured by our partner. It was a very good experience.
What other advice do I have?
Before you buy infrastructure like this, I would recommend some training. It'll help to get really good training in infrastructure management. For example, in my case, a quick overview when I started to manage the infrastructure definitely helped. It's very hard because at the beginning you are a little lost. The infrastructure is easy to manage, but it would be better if you take time before you install the infrastructure to learn more.
On a scale from one to ten, I would give Cisco UCS B-Series a nine.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Network Security Manager at a financial services firm with 501-1,000 employees
Stable, easy to set up, and there are many experts available in the market
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is simple, and not very complex."
- "The monitoring features and integration with other products can be improved."
What needs improvement?
The monitoring features and integration with other products can be improved.
In particular, integration with other products is difficult, especially for logging purposes. In this regard, it is not very good and improvement is required.
Technical support should be more timely.
For how long have I used the solution?
We have been working with the Cisco UCS B-Series for more than a year.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This is a stable product.
How are customer service and technical support?
The technical support is good although they respond very late to open cases.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
One of the other products that we currently work with is Huawei, and they give us much cheaper prices. They also have a good product, which is sometimes even better than Cisco. Nonetheless, my team has a lot of experience and expertise with Cisco.
How was the initial setup?
The initial setup is simple, and not very complex.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The pricing for Cisco products is always high.
What other advice do I have?
My advice for anybody who is considering Cisco UCS is that if it's within your budget, I recommend it because they are popular in the market and it is easy to find experts.
Overall, this is a good product.
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Buyer's Guide
Cisco UCS B-Series
March 2025

Learn what your peers think about Cisco UCS B-Series. Get advice and tips from experienced pros sharing their opinions. Updated: March 2025.
844,944 professionals have used our research since 2012.
Infrastructure Consultant at a tech consulting company with 501-1,000 employees
With the virtual NICs/HBA, we can redesign the IO schema without upgrading hardware. Configuring the hardware platform could be better.
What is most valuable?
- Virtual NICs/HBA
- Nexus FC/Ethernet convergence
How has it helped my organization?
VirtualNICs/HBA allow us to redesign completely the IO schema (network and storage) without needing to upgrade or acquire additional hardware and controllers.
What needs improvement?
- Hardware platform configuration
For how long have I used the solution?
I have used this solution for three years. We are currently using Cisco UCS, Chassis Model UCS5108, I/O Modules UCS-IOM-2208XP, Fabric Interconnect Model UCS-FI-6248UP, and Cisco Nexus 5548.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
We had some issues with certain NX-OSs in the Fabric Interconnect.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
I have not encountered any scalability issues.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is 7/10.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
I did not previously use a different solution. I’ve previous experience with HPE BladeSystem. UCS looks to me more flexible and powerful.
How was the initial setup?
Initial setup was complex. UCS deployment & management requires deep knowledge of the platform.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
It is expensive (like all converged platforms). From a cost perspective, UCS must be evaluated seriously in order to determine if the company requirements justify the acquisition. It is important to take into account that UCS is an end-to-end solution. Integration with Cisco Nexus is a must.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
Before choosing this product, I did not evaluate other options, but in the convergence market, UCS should be evaluated as a clear option to evaluate.
What other advice do I have?
Training, training, training and planning, planning, planning!
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
System Engineer at a tech services company with 51-200 employees
It has integration with vSphere, but UCS Manager should be rewritten in HTML5.
What is most valuable?
The VM-FEX, hardware integration with VMware vSphere.
How has it helped my organization?
It's faster to provision virtual servers than physical. Also, it has very good orchestration with UCS Director 5.2.
What needs improvement?
The UCS Manager is written in Java and has many problems after the new Java releases. It should be rewritten in HTML5.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've used it for one and a half years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
It was not a problem.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
It is very stable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
No issues encountered.
How are customer service and technical support?
Customer Service:
4/5
Technical Support:4/5
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
IBM Blade Servers,was in place previously.
How was the initial setup?
It was straightforward to do it. You need to have expert-level knowledge in LAN, SAN, and servers to be able to do it properly
What about the implementation team?
I did by myself.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
No, Cisco UCS was the stuff we wanted.
Disclosure: My company has a business relationship with this vendor other than being a customer: We're the biggest Cisco Gold Partner in Poland.
Cyber Security System Architect at a manufacturing company with 1,001-5,000 employees
It's helped us to develop a new platform for virtualization, with a small footprint, and improved our computing power efficiency.
What is most valuable?
- Flexibility,
- Management
- VMware interoperability
How has it helped my organization?
It's helped us to develop a new platform for virtualization, with a small footprint, and improved our computing power efficiency.
What needs improvement?
It could be helpful to have a wizard to make the setup routine better, and a wizard to help with the managerial processes to avoid misconfiguration issues.
For how long have I used the solution?
We've been using a Cisco 6296, 5100 Chassis, B-Series server B200M3, VIC1280 for two years.
What was my experience with deployment of the solution?
We have had no issues with the deployment.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
There have been no performance issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
It's been able to scale for our needs.
How are customer service and technical support?
They are very professional.
Which solution did I use previously and why did I switch?
Our system used to be based on the usual rack servers, with Dell M1000 based blades.
How was the initial setup?
The hardware setup was easy. The initial setup through the manager requires a deep understanding of the platform.
What about the implementation team?
We implemented it with the assistance of an integrator who were a Cisco partner. I definitely recommended you get professional assistance to help with the initial run phase. It's critically important to provide formal learning to the internal team that will be in charge of the day-to-day operating activities.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
I'd recommend that you create a "turn Key" solution pack, including both hardware and platform licensing, and guest licensing. You could also get this by implementing it through re-sellers.
Which other solutions did I evaluate?
We also looked into HP servers, but decided that Cisco was better in most areas. Combined with Nexus switches, it provides us with a versatile solution for a virtual platform including SAN fabric capability build in, networking flexibility and SDN, and is better to management.
What other advice do I have?
You need to have at least a basic understanding of the product concept and architecture variations in order to better understand use cases and ROI estimation in order to get the initial sizing right, and create the right scaling plan.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
IT Infrastructure Engineer at a government with 5,001-10,000 employees
Easy to use GUI, with good scalability and support but the pricing could be reduced
Pros and Cons
- "The GUI makes is simple to use and deploy."
- "The pricing could be less."
What is our primary use case?
We are using this solution to connect to a rack system.
What is most valuable?
The GUI makes is simple to use and deploy.
What needs improvement?
Managing could be improved. It's too hard.
The pricing could be less.
For how long have I used the solution?
I have been working with Cisco UCS B Series for six years.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
This solution is stable, we had not had any issues.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
This solution is scalable.
The scalability is very good.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is very good. We had two or three issues, but they were able to solve them.
How was the initial setup?
The initials setup is straightforward.
It requires some preparation. It's not as easy as Microsoft, but for Cisco, it's still good.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
Pricing with Cisco is very high.
The price is very inefficient.
What other advice do I have?
I would rate this solution an eight out of ten.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Solutions Architect at a tech services company with 1,001-5,000 employees
Replacing Fabric interconnects and IOMs can be done while the system is up and serving production data. However, I'd like to see an integrated management interface for all NetApp Flexpod products.
Valuable Features:
The features of Cisco UCS that are of the most value to me is the ability to build Service Profiles for servers based on your needs. You can add HBAs and NICs to servers as needed, and you can remove them just as easily.
Also, with UCS, updating firmware and drivers has been simplified and can be done throughout the system simply by associating new firmware policies to the hardware. You can also run different versions of firmware as needed to support legacy applications.
Improvements to My Organization:
UCS has made it possible to replace and upgrade servers quickly and easily while keeping things up and running for the enterprise.
Replacing the Fabric interconnects and IOMs can be done while the system is up and serving production data. You can almost effectively negate downtime from your organization as a result.
Room for Improvement:
I would really like to see an integrated management interface for all the products for FlexPod, as well as a verification tool like Immersive that can give you feedback about your compatibility with FlexPod guidelines.
Other Advice:
Get a qualified vendor to help you go through the process, and take some training to get familiar with how things work together.
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.
Implementation and Support Engineer at PRACSO S.R.L.
Extremely stable with robust hardware and good technical support
Pros and Cons
- "The initial setup is pretty simple and straightforward."
- "The price of this product is too high. They should work to make it more affordable."
What is our primary use case?
The solution is primarily used for computation purposes.
What is most valuable?
The hardware available for the solution is very good. It's quite reliable and robust.
The visualization is excellent.
The initial setup is pretty simple and straightforward.
The scalability is excellent.
We found that the stability is extremely reliable.
Technical support is very good in general.
What needs improvement?
The price of this product is too high. They should work to make it more affordable.
For how long have I used the solution?
I've been dealing with the solution for about three years at this point. It's been a while.
What do I think about the stability of the solution?
The stability and performance of this Cisco product are excellent. There are no bugs or glitches. It doesn't crash or freeze. It's very reliable.
What do I think about the scalability of the solution?
The scalability potential of the product is very, very good. If a company needs to expand it, it can do so with relative ease.
How are customer service and technical support?
Technical support is pretty good. We find Cisco to be knowledgeable and responsive. We're satisfied with the level of support we receive overall. They're great. All UCS products have great support.
How was the initial setup?
We found the initial setup to be pretty easy. It's straightforward. I wouldn't describe it as too complex or difficult. A company should have no problems deploying it.
What was our ROI?
We have seen an ROI and would recommend the solution based on those observations.
What's my experience with pricing, setup cost, and licensing?
The solution is quite expensive. It's pretty high, especially when you compare it against the offerings of other vendors. They need to be more competitive in terms of pricing.
What other advice do I have?
We're a Cisco partner.
We are dealing with the latest version of the solution. I can't speak to the exact version number.
I can recommend the solution wholeheartedly to other organizations. I would really recommend it due to the fact that it's a really stable technology. Also, it can produce a return on investment for organizations as well.
On a scale from one to ten, I'd rate the product at an eight. We've largely been quite pleased with its capabilities.
Which deployment model are you using for this solution?
On-premises
Disclosure: I am a real user, and this review is based on my own experience and opinions.

Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco UCS B-Series Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Updated: March 2025
Product Categories
Blade ServersPopular Comparisons
HPE Synergy
Dell PowerEdge M
HPE BladeSystem
HPE Superdome X
Supermicro SuperBlade
Lenovo Flex System
PowerEdge C
Cisco UCS E-Series Servers
Buyer's Guide
Download our free Cisco UCS B-Series Report and get advice and tips from experienced pros
sharing their opinions.
Quick Links
Learn More: Questions:
- When evaluating Blade Servers, what aspect do you think is the most important to look for?
- Does anyone have statistics on how often a fire occurs in a computer room?
- DELL EMC Blade Servers vs UCS Blade Servers - which are the best?
- Use cases for Lenovo SN550 ThinkSystem SN550 Blade server
- Why is Blade Servers important for companies?