Dell PowerEdge C-Series and Cisco UCS B-Series both compete in the data center server market. Dell PowerEdge C-Series offers a strong balance of performance and cost-effectiveness, while Cisco UCS B-Series stands out with high scalability and centralized management capabilities.
Features: Dell PowerEdge C-Series provides robust configuration options and high reliability, making it ideal for managing hybrid environments. It features iDRAC for efficient remote management, and users find it easy to customize and manage. Cisco UCS B-Series offers centralized management and streamlined server provisioning through service profiles. It scales efficiently and integrates well with virtualization platforms, providing an optimized environment for demanding applications.
Room for Improvement: Dell PowerEdge C-Series could enhance its iDRAC application interface and make pricing more competitive. It also needs to simplify its update process and improve technical support. Cisco UCS B-Series requires a refined management interface away from Java and better integration with third-party tools. Its complexity can be daunting, and users find it priced high, recommending more affordable monitoring tools and simpler setup processes.
Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Dell PowerEdge C-Series is considered easy to deploy, with users generally satisfied with its support, though response times can vary. Cisco UCS B-Series, while offering extensive support, is often challenging due to its complex setup and reliance on offshore teams affecting response times. Dell's deployment process is straightforward, but there's room for improvement in service speed and efficiency compared to the more complex Cisco setup.
Pricing and ROI: Dell PowerEdge C-Series is perceived as mid-range in pricing, offering good value through performance and operational efficiency, resulting in significant ROI. Cisco UCS B-Series tends to be more expensive, impacting upfront costs, but provides long-term value through robust features and integration capabilities. Dell's cost advantage contrasts with Cisco's premium price, which is justified by its extensive capabilities.
Additionally, we achieved server consolidation, running multiple services on fewer servers without purchasing new ones, resulting in significant financial benefits.
I see it is absolutely beneficial to have a return on investment after implementing Dell PowerEdge C-Series at about 20%.
Cisco's technical support is highly helpful and responsive.
The prompt support with mission critical response and on-site visits are coming on priority and within a little span of time, the issues are getting resolved.
I think the technical support team is responding well regarding response time and overall competence.
The stability of Cisco UCS B-Series is impeccable, as it has been running smoothly without any need for maintenance.
Last year, we faced challenges with firmware upgrades, but they were quickly resolved with assistance from Cisco TAC.
This is one area where they can improve the performance of the server or implement some application improvements in the solution to make it easier for end users to implement properly.
The main improvement I think is the price when considering room for improvement regarding first-level support or response time.
Currently, we are using a few HP tools to monitor continuously the systems, system IOPS, systems network bandwidth, CPU, memory, and processing capabilities.
The management software, Cisco One, is priced a bit high but still considered reasonable.
Its administration capabilities provide easy access to performance reports, logs, and utilization data, which are essential for effective server management.
The compute capability of Dell PowerEdge C-Series has benefited my organization through cost reduction.
Dell PowerEdge C-Series advanced security features are noteworthy. My applications are running without any issues, without any hacking or data leakage.
All features for the local area network, including domain controller, DHCP, DNS, and even VLANs, have been the most valuable features I have found.
| Product | Market Share (%) |
|---|---|
| Cisco UCS B-Series | 7.1% |
| Dell PowerEdge C- Series | 3.2% |
| Other | 89.7% |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 20 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 15 |
| Large Enterprise | 41 |
| Company Size | Count |
|---|---|
| Small Business | 16 |
| Midsize Enterprise | 5 |
| Large Enterprise | 11 |
Dell PowerEdge C-Series is known for its high performance, scalability, and efficient power usage, making it suitable for demanding applications in data centers. Its compact design and affordability offer practicality and value for businesses seeking reliable hardware solutions.
PowerEdge C-Series offers robust virtualization capabilities and advanced reliability with Intel Xeon sockets and Intel's RAS. This series is valued for seamless expansion and strong technical support, enhancing its appeal for enterprise environments. While there is room for improvement in cost, compatibility, and additional memory slots, it remains a favored choice for database servers, VOIP systems, and application hosting due to its flexible configurations and ease of integration with VMware infrastructure. Enhancements desired by users include better AI integration, more iDRAC functionality, and improved stability and service procedures.
What are the key features of PowerEdge C-Series?In banking, telecommunications, and public sectors, Dell PowerEdge C-Series is implemented to support virtual machines, internal applications, and high-performance computing tasks. Its reliable integration with VMware infrastructure makes it an ideal choice for businesses seeking efficient workload management and critical hardware backup solutions. Its affordability and power efficiency allow organizations in these sectors to meet their computing demands without straining budgets.
We monitor all Blade Servers reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.
