Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs Fortinet FortiADC comparison

A10 Networks and Fortinet are both solutions in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category. A10 Networks is ranked #18, while Fortinet is ranked #7 with an average rating of 8.0. A10 Networks holds a 0.3% mindshare in ADC, compared to Fortinet’s 9.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of A10 Networks users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 86% of Fortinet users who would recommend it.
A10 Networks Lightning ADC
Read 3 A10 Networks Lightning ADC reviews
  • 154 Views
  • 124 Comparison Views
100% willing to recommend
Fortinet FortiADC
Read 24 Fortinet FortiADC reviews
  • 3,790 Views
  • 3,142 Comparison Views
86% willing to recommend
 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report
Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 17, 2024

Fortinet FortiADC and A10 Networks Lightning ADC are prominent in the application delivery controller market. Fortinet FortiADC gains the advantage with its competitive pricing and strong support, whereas A10 Networks Lightning ADC is notable for its advanced features, offering innovative solutions at a higher cost.

Features: Fortinet FortiADC provides comprehensive traffic management and advanced threat protection, enhancing security. A10 Networks Lightning ADC excels in cloud-native performance, application acceleration, and traffic analytics, ensuring superior cloud compatibility.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Fortinet FortiADC offers a simplified deployment process accompanied by excellent customer support for smooth integration. A10 Networks Lightning ADC supports flexible deployment options, slightly more complex, but backed by responsive customer service particularly beneficial for environments requiring cloud-native solutions.

Pricing and ROI: Fortinet FortiADC is characterized by lower setup costs and efficient return on investment, appealing to organizations mindful of budget. A10 Networks Lightning ADC requires a higher initial investment but delivers significant ROI through advanced capabilities, making it worthwhile for enterprises pursuing cutting-edge technology.

DOWNLOAD THE COMPLETE REPORT
To learn more, read our detailed A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. Fortinet FortiADC Report (Updated: January 2025).
Buyer's Guide
A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. Fortinet FortiADC
January 2025
Download the complete report
Helped 832,138 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Categories and Ranking

A10 Networks Lightning ADC
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
18th
Average Rating
7.0
Reviews Sentiment
6.3
Number of Reviews
3
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
Fortinet FortiADC
Ranking in Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
7th
Average Rating
7.8
Reviews Sentiment
6.8
Number of Reviews
24
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
 

Mindshare comparison

As of February 2025, in the Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) category, the mindshare of A10 Networks Lightning ADC is 0.3%, up from 0.3% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Fortinet FortiADC is 9.8%, up from 7.4% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
 

Featured Reviews

RONALDO DE MELO - PeerSpot reviewer
Efficient application security while optimizing connections
The initial setup is simple; it is not complex. The configuration itself is simple and can be done in a couple of hours. However, the migration of the system to A10 Networks takes longer due to critical applications. Clients prefer to move them one by one, which is why it takes a significant amount of time. The configuration itself is simple, especially for this application.
Read full review
Saeid Khanipour Ghobani - PeerSpot reviewer
High-level load balancing and routing protocols but scalability is limited to 200 gigabits
The initial setup and configuration are very easy because the solution includes a simple OS. Initial configuration takes about ten minutes for simple environments. It is important to assess the environment and decide what services, servers, and web applications are needed. The solution can be configured in router mode or one-arm mode which uses source NAT as destination NAT to send traffic to the firewall. One-arm mode is more complex and requires discussions with our engineers. For example, you have a website with Node.js for your programming language, Amazon S3 for your CDN, NGINX for your web server, and you use both React and reCAPTCHA. Our team meets with your developer to learn your website and OS through a multi-step process and then we configure the solution to protect everything.
Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"It allows you to secure the application while balancing the connections for many other customers, reducing CPU usage and server load."
"Our clients appreciate that this is a security enabled solution."
"What I like about Lightning ADC, is that instead of having a big appliance sitting in front of the Kubernetes cluster, Lightning can pretty much go inside of Kubernetes."
"I like the solution's load balance with DNS intelligence."
"The main feature that we use is GSLB (Global Server Load Balancing). GSLB makes the customer's network more reliable by scaling applications across multiple datacenters. GSLB as a disaster recovery solution can direct traffic based on site availability."
"Content caching and content compression are good features."
"TSL and SSL offloading are both very good features."
"Although FortiADC has multiple features that I like, the global DNS is the most helpful. It is primarily useful for customers with huge environments and at least two data centers. FortiADC can act as your DNS server. It can check which data center has the lowest latency, and route traffic to that one. It's an intelligent DNS."
"The GSLB, the DR side, is the best part. Because we had our main side in one city, we created another, and we had a complete MPLS over the internet. We used the GSLB and data loss for our business applications."
"It's a good product because it supports all the features that ADC solutions in the market can support, like F5 solutions, for example, such as the LTM of F5."
"FortiADC provides load-balancing capabilities needed for integration with other Fortinet platforms."
More Fortinet FortiADC pros
 

Cons

"A10 documentation is not as open and accessible as AWS and Azure documentation is."
"The support from A10 should be improved."
"We would like to see some improvement in the rapidity with which we can customize security facts within the solution."
"Issues with SSL and encrypted traffic."
"Fortinet FortiADC should include an advanced-level SD-WAN."
"The solution’s pricing could be improved."
"When the FortiADC is part of a platform with components like FortiManager and FortiGate, automation and pushing configuration are very inconvenient."
"The solution's WAF needs an upgrade because it is not as good as FortiWeb, VMware, F5, or Imperva."
"When the FortiADC is part of a platform with components like FortiManager and FortiGate, automation and pushing configuration are very inconvenient."
"Fortinet has some drawbacks, and it can be a bit challenging to scale."
"One of the product's areas of improvement includes reducing the number of components requiring additional licenses, such as antivirus and IDS, which are already covered by our firewall."
More Fortinet FortiADC cons
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

Information not available
"Our basic license excludes features such as antivirus and IDS. Due to license limitations, some functionalities are not configured."
"The solution is less expensive than F5 or Imperva and is the most reasonably priced option available."
"They offer a perpetual license."
"I rate Fortinet FortiADC's pricing one out of ten. It is fixed."
"I believe the price is good. It's fair. There are no extra costs."
"The product has average pricing. I rate its pricing a five out of ten."
"The solution's pricing is an issue and should be improved."
"The product has affordable pricing."
More Fortinet FortiADC pricing and cost advice
report
See which vendors are best for you
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) solutions are best for your needs.
See recommendations
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
19%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Government
9%
Educational Organization
6%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

What do you like most about A10 Networks Lightning ADC?
It allows you to secure the application while balancing the connections for many other customers, reducing CPU usage and server load.
See all answers
What needs improvement with A10 Networks Lightning ADC?
There is room for improvement in the customer service and support team. The support from A10 should be improved.
See all answers
What is your primary use case for A10 Networks Lightning ADC?
We sell a couple of boxes to Comodo Federal and Bank of Brazil, which are the biggest banks here in Brazil. They also have a F5 tool.
See all answers
Is Citrix ADC (formerly Netscaler) the best ADC to use and if not why?
For ADC, any ADC can do a good job. But in case if you want to add WAF functionality to the same ADC hardware you have to look for other ADC's like F5, Imperva, Radware, Fortinet, etc.
See all answers
Do you recommend Fortinet FortiADC?
I recommend Fortinet FortiADC. My experience with Fortinet has been very positive. Our company has been using it for around five years. We mainly use FortiADC for the load balancing of application ...
See all answers
What do you like most about Fortinet FortiADC?
The user interface is very easy and integrates with Sandbox easily.
See all answers
 

Comparisons

No data available
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Fortinet FortiADC Logo
F5 BIG-IP Local Traffic Manager (LTM) vs Fortinet FortiADC
Compared 26% of the time
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Fortinet FortiADC Logo
Fortinet FortiWeb vs Fortinet FortiADC
Compared 26% of the time
NetScaler vs Fortinet FortiADC Logo
NetScaler vs Fortinet FortiADC
Compared 13% of the time
Kemp LoadMaster vs Fortinet FortiADC Logo
Kemp LoadMaster vs Fortinet FortiADC
Compared 9% of the time
A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Fortinet FortiADC Logo
A10 Networks Thunder ADC vs Fortinet FortiADC
Compared 5% of the time
More Fortinet FortiADC Competitors
 

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide
Application Delivery Controllers (ADC)
January 2025
A10 Networks Lightning ADC reportDownload A10 Networks Lightning ADC product report
Buyer's Guide
Fortinet FortiADC
February 2025
Fortinet FortiADC reportDownload Fortinet FortiADC product report
 

Also Known As

Lightning ADS
FortiADC Application Delivery Controller, FortiADC
 

Overview

A cloud-native, software-defined solution that provides integrated advanced load-balancing, performance optimization, application security and per-application analytics to increase operational agility and application performance.

A10 Networks

Fortinet FortiADC is a robust application delivery controller (ADC) that delivers application optimization, application security, and application availability. FortiADC is a valued offering from Fortinet, which is widely recognized as a trusted supplier of dynamic security solutions worldwide. FortiADC offers dynamic security functions (AV, DDoS, and WAF) in addition to advanced application connectors for a simplified deployment and complete transparency to an organization's networks and applications. FortiADC offers three primary deployment options: physical machine, virtual machine, (VM) and cloud solution options.

Fortinet FortiADC Benefits

  • FortiADC security protocol: FortiADC integrates with FortiSandbox to improve the overall antivirus security protections where every file is scanned for known and unknown malicious risks. If a file is identified as malicious or problematic, it will be blocked in the future.

  • SSL protocol: FortiADC securely uses the most up-to-date cryptography to provide exceptional encryption and decryption using a hardware-based SSL ASIC. FortiADC offers complete transparency to inspect all traffic for threats, improves server response time, and reduces backend server load, SSL inspection and SSL offloading. FortiADC integrates seamlessly with Gemalto’s SafeNet Hardware Security Module (HSM).

  • FortiADC connectors: FortiADC Fabric Connectors offer open API-based integration and coordination with numerous software-defined networks (SDNs), third-party partners, and cloud management providers. Fortinet Fabric Connectors provide deep open and turnkey integration with recognized third-party vendors such as AWS, K8s, OCI, and SAP, in multi-vendor solutions, improving scalability, simplified management, and automation.

  • Business stability: FortiADC load balancing for on-premise global server load balancing (GSBL) and in the cloud (FortiGSBL Cloud) will ensure users can maintain a reliable and available network by improving the ability of scaling applications throughout numerous data centers to reduce application response times and enhance disaster recovery. Users are able to define protocols based on network latency concerns, overall data performance, and site availability.

Fortinet FortiADC Features

  • Application availability

    • 4-7 application load balancing: DNS, HTTPS, RTMP, RADIUS, MySQL and more

    • External fabric connectors: Splunk Integration, AWS/OCI Connector, Kubernetes Service.

    • Security fabric connectors: FortiSIEM, Fortigate BanIP Integration, FortiAnalyzer, and more.

    • Deployment modes: High availability (AA/AP Failover), Router mode, transparent mode (switch), one-arm mode (proxy with X-forwarded for support.

  • Web application firewall (WAF)

    • Security services: Captcha support, cookie support, HTTP header security, XML/SOAP/JSON validation, CSRF protection, API gateway, and more.

    • Application security: Web attack signature, bot detection, web vulnerability scanner, OWASP Top-10 Wizard, API protection and more.
  • Application enhancement

    • HTTP and TCP improvement: TCP buffering, HTTP compressions/decompression, HTTP caching (dynamic and static objects), Bandwidth monitoring using quality of service (QoS), TCP buffering, and more.

    • Authentication offloading: Two-factor authentication (Fortitoken/Fortitoken Cloud and Google Authentication), NTLM, AUTH2.0, SAML 2.0 (SP and Idp) RADIUS, LDAP, Kerbos, and local.

    • Networking: Integration with Ansible, Cisco ACI, OpenStack and Nutanix, NVGRE and VXLAN support, VLAN and port trunking support, IPv6 Support (SLB, firewall, routing and interfaces), Dynamic NAT, Hide NAT, Static NAT for added scalability and flexibility.

    • Management: Syslog support, SNMP using private MIBs with threshold-based traps. REST APIs, VDOMS, data analytics, real-time monitoring graphs, role-based monitoring, intuitive reporting, FortiView integration, and more.

Fortinet
 

Sample Customers

Handle Financial
Black Gold Regional Schools, Amadeus Hospitality, Jefferson County, Chunghwa Telecom, City of Boroondara, Dimension Data
Buyer's Guide
A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. Fortinet FortiADC
January 2025
Free Report: A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. Fortinet FortiADC
Find out what your peers are saying about A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. Fortinet FortiADC and other solutions. Updated: January 2025.
DOWNLOAD NOW
832,138 professionals have used our research since 2012.
See our A10 Networks Lightning ADC vs. Fortinet FortiADC report.
See our list of best Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) vendors.

We monitor all Application Delivery Controllers (ADC) reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.