We performed a comparison between Ab Initio Co>Operating System and AWS Glue based on real PeerSpot user reviews.
Find out in this report how the two Cloud Data Integration solutions compare in terms of features, pricing, service and support, easy of deployment, and ROI."Co>Operating System's most valuable feature is its ability to process bulk data effectively."
"Ab Initio reaches the highest performance and is very flexible in processing huge amounts of data."
"I like the fact that AWS Glue works with Python scripts."
"AWS Glue's most valuable features are the data catalog, including crawlers and tables, and Glue Studio, which means you don't have to use custom code."
"I like that it's flexible, powerful, and allows you to write your own queries and scripts to get the needed transformations."
"We no longer had to worry much about infrastructure management because AWS Glue is serverless, and Amazon takes care of the underlying infrastructure."
"The solution helps organizations gain flexibility in defining the structure of the data."
"The solution is highly user-friendly, and its features are easy to use. The new addition of AWS Glue Data Catalog is also very beneficial, making the tool even more helpful for its users."
"Data catalog and triggers are the two best features for me. AWS Glue has its own data catalog, which makes it great and really easy to use. Triggers are also really good for scheduling the ETL process."
"It is AWS-integrated. There is end-to-end integration with the other AWS services. It is also user-friendly."
"An awesome improvement would be big data solutions, for example, implementing some kind of business intelligence or neural networks for artificial intelligence."
"Co>Operating System would be improved with more integrations for less well-known technologies."
"In terms of improvement, the performance of AWS Glue could be faster."
"The price of the solution could improve."
"If there's a cluster-related configuration, we have to make worker notes, which is quite a headache when processing a large amount of data."
"There should be more connectors for different databases."
"One area that could be improved is the ETL view. The drag-and-drop interface is not as user-friendly as some other ETL tools."
"The solution’s stability could be improved."
"Glue could perform better. It sometimes takes too long to test a Glue job. Google Cloud Platform offers more Python scripts than AWS."
"Currently, it supports only two languages in the background: Python and Scala. From our customization point of view, it would be helpful if it can also support Java in the background."
More Ab Initio Co>Operating System Pricing and Cost Advice →
Ab Initio Co>Operating System is ranked 28th in Data Integration with 2 reviews while AWS Glue is ranked 1st in Cloud Data Integration with 37 reviews. Ab Initio Co>Operating System is rated 9.6, while AWS Glue is rated 7.8. The top reviewer of Ab Initio Co>Operating System writes "Excellent bulk data processing for large enterprises". On the other hand, the top reviewer of AWS Glue writes "Provides serverless mechanism, easy data transformation and automated infrastructure management". Ab Initio Co>Operating System is most compared with SSIS, Collibra Catalog, Azure Data Factory, Talend Data Management Platform and Informatica Cloud Data Integration, whereas AWS Glue is most compared with AWS Database Migration Service, Informatica PowerCenter, Informatica Cloud Data Integration, SSIS and Talend Open Studio. See our AWS Glue vs. Ab Initio Co>Operating System report.
See our list of best Cloud Data Integration vendors.
We monitor all Cloud Data Integration reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.