Acronis Cyber Protect vs Veritas System Recovery comparison

"The solution is exceptional for desktop backup."

"The user interface (UI) is easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is the fact that it backs up my systems transparently in the background, and I'm not even conscious of it."

"This is a full software so deployment time is very quick."

"The pricing is fine."

"The most valuable feature is the fact that you can archive backups quite easily and minimize the amount of space you're using."

"The ability to clone backups."

"The most valuable feature is the quick restoration. We can restore the data quickly."

"The installation was straightforward."

"With Veritas System Recovery, we have the option to run an infinite number of full backups according to our requirements."

"Offers good recovery quickly."

"The solution captures the system state, so when we restore the system, it will be restored to the state it was in at the time of the backup."

"You can back up the whole image."

"It has a user-friendly interface."

"The solution has helped reduce my company's cost by around 50 to 60 percent."

"The tool helps automate system recovery. The solution is most useful in scenarios involving restoration to a different environment. For instance, when migrating from a physical server to a virtual one, the tool facilitates conversion."

"I've had some issues with the understandability of the interface. I think if they had someone with expertise in user interfaces to look at this, they could clean up the user interface."

"Because Acronis Backup is an on-premises solution, there is extra overhead. It's harder to manage, and there's no real remote access. You have to physically log in to the machine to manage it. The reporting feature works fine, and you will be able to send out reports. However, that is where it stops. The deployment could be improved and could be through a network chain. If we need to deploy two machines that are not connected to the internet but connected to two different networks, it would be great to have a machine with dual mix that has access to the backup server and to those machines. It would be like a relay that you can install on the machine with a two-mix, and that machine can then connect to your backup server and to the other machines. You should be able to see the other machines on that network and be able to deploy to it and push jobs to it."

"We would always support better pricing."

"If we could have a mass deployment option using Acronis, that would be helpful."

"The reporting can be improved."

"The initial setup was complex. We had to deploy it through an external consultant team."

"The product needs to have a simple DR process."

"We have issues with the SQL databases which are a little shaky."

"We faced issues with recovery and restoration."

"Lacks the ability to protect the database snapshot."

"The product's integration capabilities are an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Veritas System Recovery’s pricing and local support need some improvement."

"The pricing could be cheaper."

"It needs an easier interface."

"The reliability is sometimes lacking."

"The tool's deployment could be easier. The deployment itself isn't the issue; rather, the problem lies in configuring policies and testing everything before it's ready. We invest a significant amount of time in preparing for various scenarios. However, we often encounter situations where changes have occurred since our initial preparations. This can render the automation less valuable."

"The cost of updates is less than $100 USD yearly."

"Our licenses come with a one-time yearly subscription fee."

"If the solution was less expensive it would be better."

"I find the pricing structure satisfactory, it is around $25 per year."

"There is a license required for this solution and it can be on a monthly basis."

"This is an affordable product and fits within our customers' budgets."

"Acronis Backup is cheaper. If you install it on a hypervisor, you only pay for a single license. It would be for the backup server, and everything else will be covered by it. In that sense, it becomes a much cheaper option. However, if you have virtual machines, then it can be more expensive. Also, if you have a lot of physical machines the cost can be higher because each entity will need a separate license. There is a monthly license cost."

"Its price is quite friendly on the pocket. You need to pay the licensing cost upfront, and then the support charges are on an annual basis."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There is no need to pay any additional fees apart from the licensing costs attached to the solution."