Acronis Cyber Protect vs Veritas System Recovery comparison

"The most valuable feature is the fact that it backs up my systems transparently in the background, and I'm not even conscious of it."

"The web-based interface makes it easy to use."

"The most valuable feature is that you can do a bare-metal restore even with dissimilar hardware."

"Since the last version, everything has been improved."

"In my opinion, it's the best product for end-users and PCs."

"The licensing model is very good."

"It makes a full image of the hard drive. If a hard drive fails, all we do is recover to another hard drive."

"For local backups, it has options to back up almost any storage. The back can be either a shared folder or anything you want, it's pretty flexible."

"The solution captures the system state, so when we restore the system, it will be restored to the state it was in at the time of the backup."

"The tool helps automate system recovery. The solution is most useful in scenarios involving restoration to a different environment. For instance, when migrating from a physical server to a virtual one, the tool facilitates conversion."

"With Veritas System Recovery, we have the option to run an infinite number of full backups according to our requirements."

"The solution has helped reduce my company's cost by around 50 to 60 percent."

"Offers good recovery quickly."

"It has a user-friendly interface."

"You can back up the whole image."

"The installation was straightforward."

"Because Acronis Backup is an on-premises solution, there is extra overhead. It's harder to manage, and there's no real remote access. You have to physically log in to the machine to manage it. The reporting feature works fine, and you will be able to send out reports. However, that is where it stops. The deployment could be improved and could be through a network chain. If we need to deploy two machines that are not connected to the internet but connected to two different networks, it would be great to have a machine with dual mix that has access to the backup server and to those machines. It would be like a relay that you can install on the machine with a two-mix, and that machine can then connect to your backup server and to the other machines. You should be able to see the other machines on that network and be able to deploy to it and push jobs to it."

"When an error occurs, the information is not always easy to understand and these messages should be made more clear."

"The solution needs to have better stability. I would like to improve the tool’s support through calls."

"If I could create a protected image backup on a computer partition that just would be just for the image backup; and only the program could access it to prevent viruses from getting into it. That would be very, very good."

"I believe that the next release should be easier to configure as this one is difficult to configure even the easiest of tasks."

"I can't select a network location. I have to map a drive on the server, and then I have to select the mapped drive in order for it to put the backup out there."

"The product needs to have a simple DR process."

"The dashboards for digital operations can be improved."

"Veritas System Recovery’s pricing and local support need some improvement."

"The reliability is sometimes lacking."

"We faced issues with recovery and restoration."

"It needs an easier interface."

"The tool's deployment could be easier. The deployment itself isn't the issue; rather, the problem lies in configuring policies and testing everything before it's ready. We invest a significant amount of time in preparing for various scenarios. However, we often encounter situations where changes have occurred since our initial preparations. This can render the automation less valuable."

"The product's integration capabilities are an area with certain shortcomings where improvements are required."

"Veritas System Recovery Manager offers some manager solutions, but there is room for improvement."

"Lacks the ability to protect the database snapshot."

"The price is reasonable."

"It is very cost-effective for the SMB segment, especially for start-ups and smaller environments. It is cost-effective for on-premises and on-cloud deployments in such environments."

"The pricing is reasonable. However, it depends on the storage that you use. It would be great to have a package that we can use up to a certain size of the backup, this would allow us to know what the price is going to be up to that capacity."

"There are monthly fees to use Acronis Backup."

"You don't have to pay for licenses. You can pay per gig per month. It is pretty reasonable, especially when you do it per gig."

"It has already paid off itself in the first few months that we implemented it."

"Acronis Cyber Protect's pricing is reasonable."

"The pricing is comparable to the newest solution available on the market, Altaro."

"My company has to make yearly payments towards the licensing costs attached to the solution. There is no need to pay any additional fees apart from the licensing costs attached to the solution."