Aerospike Database 7 vs MongoDB comparison

Aerospike and MongoDB are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Aerospike is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while MongoDB is ranked #1 with an average rating of 8.2. Aerospike holds a 3.8% mindshare in ND, compared to MongoDB’s 19.8% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aerospike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 92% of MongoDB users who would recommend it.

Aerospike Database 7

Read 1 Aerospike Database 7 review

473 Views
407 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

MongoDB

Read 79 MongoDB reviews

4,390 Views
3,372 Comparison Views

92% willing to recommend

Aerospike Database 7

MongoDB

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aerospike Database 7 and MongoDB based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,388 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aerospike Database 7

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

MongoDB

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

1st

Average Rating

8.2

Reviews Sentiment

6.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Open Source Databases (5th), Managed NoSQL Databases (9th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Aerospike Database 7 is 3.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of MongoDB is 19.8%, down from 26.1% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Manikandan Gunasekaran

Director of Engineering at Ola

Boost authentication and session management with reliable and fast data handling

There is a lot of technical debt in our company, and we need to update to the latest versions. The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern. A tool for automatically handling such upgrades would reduce operational huddle. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Aerospike had a community version to encourage broader adoption and experimentation.

Read full review

Uzair Faruqi

Head Of Analytics at Mjunction Services

Transforms data flow with adaptable schema and smooth public cloud deployment

One of our business units uses MongoDB, and we developed an ETL pipeline that extracts data from MongoDB and transfers it into our data warehouse MongoDB is a NoSQL database that is similar to a document database. It offers flexibility in schema adaptation, allowing us to change the schema and…

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It shows better compression and compaction, which is valuable."

"One of the most valuable features of MongoDB is it is Its open source."

"I like the document storage feature. It's pretty simple."

"In our case, it is most important to have redundancy."

"It is a stable solution. Stability-wise, I rate the solution a nine out of ten...Overall, MongoDB has helped manage and analyze attachment data."

"The most valuable features of MongoDB include the flexible schema for storing data, its replication capabilities with high availability through a replica set setup, and horizontal scalability using sharding."

"Scalability seems good. I've never been even close to finding the limits. I've run a couple of notes of redundancy but I've never had any problems with scalability."

"We decided to work with MongoDB as its interface is easier to understand and more universal."

"Easier to maintain the data with its document-based storage."

More MongoDB pros

Cons

"The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern."

"They could provide more documentation and examples for adding pipeline stages."

"The performance could be faster."

"It could be much more flexible like SequoiaDB. I would like to see more flexibility in the next release, especially when working with Microsoft Windows. A lot of people struggle with MongoDB because of their Windows versions. But Linux is faultless and mostly runs nicely."

"They could improve the UI and the analytics part."

"The performance of the solution could be improved."

"The solution could include more integrations with other platforms."

"I think that MongoDB's search engine should be improved."

"Its security features can be better. Sometimes, my higher authority says that we are not going to use MongoDB because it doesn't provide that much security for the RDBMS or relational data that we use for transactions. Instead of MongoDB, we will use Oracle Database because for a transactional service, you have to rely on RDBMS ACID properties. I would love to work on MongoDB by using my mobile phone. When I am working remotely or traveling and have some instances deployed on my server, I should be able to check through my mobile whether all the data is being pulled. GitHub has a similar feature, where it lets you read from the laptop, and you can also pull and push with your mobile phone. I would request MongoDB to provide such a feature. Basically, I want a mobile version for both iOS and Android versions."

More MongoDB cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike."

"MongoDB is an open-source solution."

"I chose MongoDB because it is cost-effective compared to Oracle, which can be expensive. In addition, MongoDB has good performance and has not caused any issues while working with it. It has been a good choice for me."

"It is rather expensive."

"I currently use the solution's community edition which is free."

"It's a community edition, so we do not pay anything."

"If you want support with the solution you will need to purchase a license and not use the open-source version. The license is a little expensive."

"MongoDB's pricing is not reasonable, but it is not as expensive as the others."

"The pricing is favorable if you opt to install MongoDB on an Amazon EC2 instance as you won't have to pay for the extra Atlas services and can instead manage the scaling yourself. This allows for a cost-effective solution and using MongoDB on a small scale, I have been able to utilize it for free."

More MongoDB pricing and cost advice

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

18%

Computer Software Company

15%

University

Manufacturing Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aerospike Database 7?

We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aerospike Database 7?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aerospike Database 7?

Aerospike is mainly used as the first step for authentication, authorization, and session persistence in our organization. It is a critical part of our workflow, as without it, we wouldn't be able ...

See all answers

What do you like most about MongoDB?

MongoDB's approach to handling data in documents rather than traditional tables has been particularly beneficial.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for MongoDB?

MongoDB is free of charge. that said, there is also a paid version. We use both free and paid versions.

See all answers

What needs improvement with MongoDB?

If something is wrong on the cluster, then you need to contact the support team. The stability could be better.

See all answers

Comparisons

ScyllaDB vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 30% of the time

Apache HBase vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 17% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 14% of the time

SingleStore vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 13% of the time

Couchbase vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 9% of the time

More Aerospike Database 7 Competitors

InfluxDB vs MongoDB

Compared 22% of the time

Couchbase vs MongoDB

Compared 13% of the time

Cassandra vs MongoDB

Compared 8% of the time

Milvus vs MongoDB

Compared 7% of the time

Faiss vs MongoDB

Compared 5% of the time

More MongoDB Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

February 2025

Download Aerospike Database 7 product report

Buyer's Guide

MongoDB

March 2025

Download MongoDB product report

Overview

Aerospike is an enterprise-class, NoSQL database solution for real-time operational applications that delivers predictable performance at scale, superior uptime, and high availability at the lowest Total Cost of Ownership compared to first-generation NoSQL and relational databases.

Aerospike

MongoDB is a flexible and scalable NoSQL database solution that efficiently handles both structured and unstructured data. It is known for its ease of use, JSON capabilities, and efficient data handling, making it ideal for developer-friendly environments.

MongoDB stands out with features like sharding, geospatial indexing, and its open-source nature. Users find it fast and appreciate its seamless integration into different applications. Despite being powerful, it remains straightforward to set up and use, bolstered by a clustering and aggregation framework that enhances its functionality. While generally appreciated for its cost-effectiveness and broad application compatibility, there is room for improvement in security, enterprise integration, and the creation of more robust training and documentation resources. Enhancing performance and adding support for traditional relational database concepts could also prove beneficial.

What are MongoDB's most important features?

Scalability: Efficiently manages growing data volumes.
Flexibility: Supports structured and unstructured data with ease.
Sharding: Distributes data across multiple servers.
Geospatial Indexing: Enables location-based data handling.
Open-source: Wide community support and customization.

What benefits or ROI should users look for?

Cost-effectiveness: Reduces overall database management expenses.
Ease of Use: Simplifies database setup and maintenance.
Developer-friendly: Accelerates application development with supportive tools.
Scalable Solutions: Adapts to evolving business requirements.

MongoDB finds widespread application across industries like healthcare, logistics, and telecommunications. It efficiently powers IoT platforms, data analytics, and document management systems. Its schema flexibility and JSON storage capabilities make it ideal for real-time processing and multi-server databases, essential for handling large-scale data volumes in modern applications.

MongoDB

Sample Customers

AppNexus, Adform, KAYAK, Williams-Sonoma Inc., The Trade Desk, GREE, BlueKai, Chango CTO, InMobi, Yashi, eXelate CTO, Snapdeal, adMarketplace, Tapad, Komli Media, Neustar, So-net Media Networks, IMHO Vi, Vizury

Facebook, MetLife, City of Chicago, Expedia, eBay, Google

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,388 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.