Aerospike Database 7 vs SingleStore comparison

The compared Aerospike and SingleStore solutions aren't in the same category. Aerospike is ranked #12 in ND , with an average rating of 8.0, and holds a 3.9% mindshare in the category. SingleStore is ranked #7 in DS , with an average rating of 8.7, and holds a 1.3% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aerospike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 100% of SingleStore users who would recommend it.

Aerospike Database 7

Read 1 Aerospike Database 7 review

527 Views
456 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

SingleStore

Read 7 SingleStore reviews

252 Views
196 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Aerospike Database 7

SingleStore

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aerospike Database 7 and SingleStore based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: December 2024).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

December 2024

Download the complete report

Helped 824,053 peers since 2012

Categories and Ranking

Aerospike Database 7

Average Rating

8.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

NoSQL Databases (12th)

SingleStore

Average Rating

8.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Database as a Service (DBaaS) (7th), Vector Databases (13th)

Mindshare comparison

While both are Databases solutions, they serve different purposes. Aerospike Database 7 is designed for NoSQL Databases and holds a mindshare of 3.9%, up 2.3% compared to last year.
SingleStore, on the other hand, focuses on Database as a Service (DBaaS), holds 1.3% mindshare, up 0.8% since last year.

NoSQL Databases

Database as a Service (DBaaS)

Featured Reviews

Manikandan Gunasekaran

Director of Engineering at Ola

Boost authentication and session management with reliable and fast data handling

There is a lot of technical debt in our company, and we need to update to the latest versions. The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern. A tool for automatically handling such upgrades would reduce operational huddle. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Aerospike had a community version to encourage broader adoption and experimentation.

Read full review

Hitesh Kunchakuri

Associate Consultant at University of California at Davis

A reasonably priced product that offers good speed and seamless support

Currently, I can't think of any areas that require improvement because SingleStore was recently launched in the market. The product can be developed further to provide more appropriate output to users as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings. The current SingleStore model provides output based on the RANK function. If a user searches for a liquor bottle, then with all the data the product has, it will search for the liquor bottle in the data, and based on a match, the product has an algorithm to rank the product because of which the paragraph that has the best match will be ranked as a 100, the next one as 99, following which the next product will be ranked as 98 and so on. The output from the solution will fetch you all the 100 products that are available in a store, but sometimes a user might require a product with a 97 or 98 percent match from the DB, meaning the product doesn't always work to provide a 100 percent match, an area I feel that can be optimized in the product. Currently, SingleStore's features are excellent as it can read documents, images, and everything. The product works seamlessly for me.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It shows better compression and compaction, which is valuable."

"It's a distributed relational database, so it does not have a single server, it has multiple servers. Its architecture itself is fast because it has multiple nodes to distribute the workload and process large amounts of data."

"The product's initial setup phase was pretty straightforward, with no complex processes."

"The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed."

"The most valuable feature is the ability to create pipelines, streamline and extract data from the pipelines."

"The ability to store data in memory is a standout feature, enhanced by robust failover mechanisms."

"The product can automatically reinstall and reconfigure in case of a shutdown."

"MemSQL supports the MySQL protocol, and many functions are similar, so the learning curve is very short."

Cons

"The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern."

"Having the ability to migrate servers using a single command would be extremely beneficial."

"For new customers, it's very tough to start. Their documentation isn't organized, and there's no online training available. SingleStore is working on it, but that's a major drawback."

"Poor key distribution can significantly impact performance, requiring a backward approach in design rather than adding tables incrementally."

"There should be more pipelines available because I think that if MemSQL can connect to other services, that would be great."

"We don't get good discounts in Pakistan."

"The product can be developed further to provide more appropriate output to users as it is one of the areas where there are shortcomings."

"It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation tasks."

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike."

"They have two main options: cloud installation and bare-metal installation, each with different pricing models."

"The product's licensing is not expensive. It is comparable."

"I would advise users to try the free 128GB version."

"SingleStore is a bit expensive."

"Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure."

"The price of the product is okay compared to the other available solutions in the market. SingleStore is a reasonably priced product, considering the functions it offers."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Computer Software Company

17%

Financial Services Firm

15%

Insurance Company

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

30%

Computer Software Company

14%

Manufacturing Company

Healthcare Company

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aerospike Database 7?

We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aerospike Database 7?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aerospike Database 7?

Aerospike is mainly used as the first step for authentication, authorization, and session persistence in our organization. It is a critical part of our workflow, as without it, we wouldn't be able ...

See all answers

What do you like most about SingleStore DB?

The paramount advantage is the exceptional speed.

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for SingleStore DB?

Using it for analytical purposes can be cost-effective in the long run, especially in terms of infrastructure. While building an on-premise cluster incurs an initial cost for servers with ample RAM...

See all answers

What needs improvement with SingleStore DB?

There's a noteworthy consideration when it comes to collecting massive amounts of data. It is not the optimal choice for direct data collection through queries, and it's more suited for aggregation...

See all answers

Comparisons

ScyllaDB vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 32% of the time

Apache HBase vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 17% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 12% of the time

MongoDB vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 10% of the time

Couchbase vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 10% of the time

More Aerospike Database 7 Competitors

ClickHouse vs SingleStore

Compared 11% of the time

Teradata vs SingleStore

Compared 8% of the time

Chroma vs SingleStore

Compared 7% of the time

SQL Server vs SingleStore

Compared 7% of the time

Imply vs SingleStore

Compared 3% of the time

More SingleStore Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

December 2024

Download Aerospike Database 7 product report

Buyer's Guide

SingleStore

November 2024

Download SingleStore product report

Learn More

Aerospike

Video not available

SingleStore

Overview

Aerospike is an enterprise-class, NoSQL database solution for real-time operational applications that delivers predictable performance at scale, superior uptime, and high availability at the lowest Total Cost of Ownership compared to first-generation NoSQL and relational databases.

SingleStore enables organizations to scale from one to one million customers, handling SQL, JSON, full text and vector workloads — all in one unified platform.

Sample Customers

AppNexus, Adform, KAYAK, Williams-Sonoma Inc., The Trade Desk, GREE, BlueKai, Chango CTO, InMobi, Yashi, eXelate CTO, Snapdeal, adMarketplace, Tapad, Komli Media, Neustar, So-net Media Networks, IMHO Vi, Vizury

6Sense, ADNOC, Adobe, Akamai, CARFAX, Cigna, Cisco, Comcast, DBS Bank, Dell, Dentsu, EY, FirstEnergy, GE, Goldman Sachs, Heap, Hulu, IMAX, Kakao, Kroger, LG, LiveRamp, Lumana, NBC, OpenDialog, Outreach, Palo Alto Networks, PicPay, RBC, Samsung, Siemens, SiriusXM, SK Telecom, SKAI, Sony, State Street Financial, STC, SunRun, TATA, Thorn, and ZoomInfo.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: December 2024.

DOWNLOAD NOW

824,053 professionals have used our research since 2012.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.