Aerospike Database 7 vs Cassandra comparison

"It shows better compression and compaction, which is valuable."

"The most valuable features of this solution are its speed and distributed nature."

"A consistent solution."

"Since I haven't had years of experience with it, it's still new to me. One valuable feature is its distribution, so I can run it partly in the cloud and part on-prem. That's a feature I'd like to use but haven't yet because we're trying to move to Azure. I don't know if or when that will happen. Ideally, we'd have it distributed over the cloud and on-prem simultaneously, so if something happens to our on-prem, we can keep going in the cloud, like a pay-as-you-go model with Azure."

"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."

"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."

"Our primary use case for the solution is testing."

"The technical evaluation is very good."

"The time series data was one of the best features along with auto publishing."

"The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern."

"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."

"The solution is not easy to use because it is a big database and you have to learn the interface. This is the case though in most of these solutions."

"There were challenges with the query language and the development interface. The query language, in particular, could be improved for better optimization. These challenges were encountered while using the Java SDK."

"Cassandra can improve by adding more built-in tools. For example, if you want to do some maintenance activities in the cluster, we have to depend on third-party tools. Having these tools build-in would be e benefit."

"Doesn't support a solution that can give aggregation."

"The initial setup of Cassandra can be difficult in the configuration. There might be a need to have assistance. The implementation process can six months for connecting to certain databases."

"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."

"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."

"We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike."

"Cassandra is a free open source solution, but there is a commercial version available called DataStax Enterprise."

"There are licensing fees that must be paid, but I'm not sure if they are paid monthly or yearly."

"I don't have the specific numbers on pricing, but it was fairly priced."

"I use the tool's open-source version."

"We pay for a license."

"We are using the open-source version of Cassandra, the solution is free."