Aerospike Database 7 vs Cassandra comparison

Aerospike and Apache are both solutions in the NoSQL Databases category. Aerospike is ranked #13 with an average rating of 8.0, while Apache is ranked #4 with an average rating of 8.0. Aerospike holds a 3.8% mindshare in ND, compared to Apache’s 11.5% mindshare. Additionally, 100% of Aerospike users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 91% of Apache users who would recommend it.

Aerospike Database 7

Read 1 Aerospike Database 7 review

473 Views
407 Comparison Views

100% willing to recommend

Cassandra

Read 23 Cassandra reviews

1,986 Views
1,759 Comparison Views

91% willing to recommend

Aerospike Database 7

Cassandra

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive Summary

We performed a comparison between Aerospike Database 7 and Cassandra based on real PeerSpot user reviews.

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases.

To learn more, read our detailed NoSQL Databases Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 842,466 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Aerospike Database 7

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

13th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

7.8

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Cassandra

Ranking in NoSQL Databases

4th

Average Rating

8.0

Reviews Sentiment

6.1

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Vector Databases (14th)

Mindshare comparison

As of March 2025, in the NoSQL Databases category, the mindshare of Aerospike Database 7 is 3.8%, up from 2.4% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Cassandra is 11.5%, down from 12.6% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

NoSQL Databases

Featured Reviews

Manikandan Gunasekaran

Director of Engineering at Ola

Boost authentication and session management with reliable and fast data handling

There is a lot of technical debt in our company, and we need to update to the latest versions. The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern. A tool for automatically handling such upgrades would reduce operational huddle. Additionally, it would be beneficial if Aerospike had a community version to encourage broader adoption and experimentation.

Read full review

Himanshu Amodwala

Senior cloud solution architect at Microsoft

Well-equipped to handle a massive influx of data and billions of requests

The use of Cassandra in real-time data analytics has been pivotal for our e-commerce platform. As our platform operates 24/7, providing services to sellers and customers alike, the need for real-time updates is paramount. For instance, when a customer leaves comments or feedback on an image, they anticipate an immediate reflection of these changes on the portal. Similarly, sellers altering product attributes or updating images expect instant visibility of these modifications. Handling large data volumes with Cassandra has been an excellent experience. Despite challenges related to the influx, these were not attributed to Cassandra itself but rather to middle-layer issues. Generally, it demonstrated scalability with workloads, thanks to its horizontal scaling capabilities. We could easily add new nodes to the system as needed, ensuring the platform coped well with increasing loads. The tool's most beneficial feature for scalability is its entire architecture. The absence of a single point of failure or a leader within the ecosystem contributes to its robust scalability. This key aspect influenced our decision to opt for the Cassandra ecosystem. In terms of performance, it demonstrated the ability to handle approximately 1.6 billion requests per day. This was achieved on AWS using EC2 instances, and it was during a period about four to five years ago.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"It shows better compression and compaction, which is valuable."

"The most valuable feature of Cassandra is its fast retrieval. Additionally, the solution can handle large amounts of data. It is the quickest application we use."

"Overall, I would rate Cassandra as nine because of its fast writes, which really suit our use cases mostly."

"Some of the valued features of this solution are it has good performance and failover."

"The most valuable features of Cassandra are its scaling capabilities and its non-SQL nature capabilities."

"The solution's database capabilities are very good."

"The technical evaluation is very good."

"The most valuable features of Cassandra are the NoSQL database, high performance, and zero-copy streaming."

"The most valuable features are the counter features and the NoSQL schema. It also has good scalability. You can scale Cassandra to any finite level."

More Cassandra pros

Cons

"The lack of automation in upgrading clusters from development to production is a concern."

"Fine-tuning was a bit of a challenge."

"There could be more integration, and it could be more user-friendly."

"The secondary index in Cassandra was a bit problematic and could be improved."

"Cassandra is very complex to manage. Sometimes, I need to involve a senior DevOps engineer if we encounter a problem."

"We experience configuration issues when accommodating the volumes we require, which often necessitates consultation with the Cassandra development team."

"The disc space is lacking. You need to free it up as you are working."

"I want Cassandra to update its open-source version more quickly. It's already feature-rich, but I'd appreciate better integration with other NoSQL databases like MariaDB or MongoDB. If I ever need to work with customers or vendors using different NoSQL databases, having native integration in Cassandra would make managing and interacting with their databases much easier."

"We found some issues with the batch inserts when the data volume is large."

More Cassandra cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike."

"I use the tool's open-source version."

"There are licensing fees that must be paid, but I'm not sure if they are paid monthly or yearly."

"Cassandra is a free open source solution, but there is a commercial version available called DataStax Enterprise."

"We are using the open-source version of Cassandra, the solution is free."

"I don't have the specific numbers on pricing, but it was fairly priced."

"We pay for a license."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which NoSQL Databases solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Computer Software Company

16%

Insurance Company

Non Profit

Financial Services Firm

20%

Computer Software Company

15%

Healthcare Company

University

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

No data available

Questions from the Community

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Aerospike Database 7?

We use around half a TB of data and spend approximately $36,000 to $40,000 USD per year on Aerospike.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Aerospike Database 7?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Aerospike Database 7?

Aerospike is mainly used as the first step for authentication, authorization, and session persistence in our organization. It is a critical part of our workflow, as without it, we wouldn't be able ...

See all answers

What do you like most about Cassandra?

See all answers

What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for Cassandra?

We are using Cassandra locally and as open-source.

See all answers

What needs improvement with Cassandra?

Cassandra is very complex to manage. Sometimes, I need to involve a senior DevOps engineer if we encounter a problem. About a year ago, we were unable to recover data without help from a senior Dev...

See all answers

Comparisons

ScyllaDB vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 30% of the time

Apache HBase vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 17% of the time

Neo4j Graph Database vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 14% of the time

SingleStore vs Aerospike Database 7

Compared 13% of the time

More Aerospike Database 7 Competitors

Couchbase vs Cassandra

Compared 19% of the time

MongoDB vs Cassandra

Compared 14% of the time

ClickHouse vs Cassandra

Compared 9% of the time

ScyllaDB vs Cassandra

Compared 8% of the time

SingleStore vs Cassandra

Compared 2% of the time

More Cassandra Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

NoSQL Databases

February 2025

Download Aerospike Database 7 product report

Buyer's Guide

Cassandra

March 2025

Download Cassandra product report

Overview

Aerospike is an enterprise-class, NoSQL database solution for real-time operational applications that delivers predictable performance at scale, superior uptime, and high availability at the lowest Total Cost of Ownership compared to first-generation NoSQL and relational databases.

Aerospike

Cassandra is a distributed and scalable database management system used for real-time data processing.

It is highly valued for its ability to handle large amounts of data, scalability, high availability, fault tolerance, and flexible data model.

It is commonly used in finance, e-commerce, and social media industries.

Apache

Sample Customers

AppNexus, Adform, KAYAK, Williams-Sonoma Inc., The Trade Desk, GREE, BlueKai, Chango CTO, InMobi, Yashi, eXelate CTO, Snapdeal, adMarketplace, Tapad, Komli Media, Neustar, So-net Media Networks, IMHO Vi, Vizury

1. Apple 2. Netflix 3. Facebook 4. Instagram 5. Twitter 6. eBay 7. Spotify 8. Uber 9. Airbnb 10. Adobe 11. Cisco 12. IBM 13. Microsoft 14. Yahoo 15. Reddit 16. Pinterest 17. Salesforce 18. LinkedIn 19. Hulu 20. Airbnb 21. Walmart 22. Target 23. Sony 24. Intel 25. Cisco 26. HP 27. Oracle 28. SAP 29. GE 30. Siemens 31. Volkswagen 32. Toyota

Find out what your peers are saying about MongoDB, ScyllaDB, Microsoft and others in NoSQL Databases. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

842,466 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our list of best NoSQL Databases vendors.

We monitor all NoSQL Databases reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.