Try our new research platform with insights from 80,000+ expert users

Agiloft Service Desk Suite vs JIRA Service Management comparison

 

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Executive SummaryUpdated on Dec 1, 2024
 

Categories and Ranking

Agiloft Service Desk Suite
Ranking in Help Desk Software
38th
Average Rating
9.6
Reviews Sentiment
7.4
Number of Reviews
2
Ranking in other categories
No ranking in other categories
JIRA Service Management
Ranking in Help Desk Software
2nd
Average Rating
8.2
Reviews Sentiment
7.1
Number of Reviews
81
Ranking in other categories
IT Service Management (ITSM) (2nd)
 

Mindshare comparison

As of December 2024, in the Help Desk Software category, the mindshare of Agiloft Service Desk Suite is 0.3%, up from 0.2% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of JIRA Service Management is 11.3%, down from 12.3% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.
Help Desk Software
 

Featured Reviews

it_user274764 - PeerSpot reviewer
It's customizable, can be developed easily, and free, but only up to a certain number of users.
This product has provided us with a tool to perform a successful trial with our customer and receive their stamp of approval to move beyond the trial phase. Because this product is infinitely customizable and easily developed, we are using it for other applications 60 days None This is actually…
Shambuling-Doni - PeerSpot reviewer
Easy to use, offers good stability and visibility for operational efficiency
The search function could be improved. We have to search a certain way. There is no generic search, it is more object-oriented search. The interface could also be more user-friendly. So, the interface and search could be improved. Additionally, I would like to see more accessibility. It would also be great if there was a Jira mobile app.

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:
 

Pros

"Our customer service and productivity have increased in quality and quantity since using this product."
"Useful for tracking issues with development."
"Automation capabilities allow for automatic ticket creation using monitoring tools."
"It scales well."
"With Jira Service Desk, the simplicity of setting up a quick form and getting the service desk running quickly is very helpful."
"The dashboards in Jira have been the most useful feature."
"One of the valuable features is that an automatic response or action can be taken on tickets."
"We can track, monitor, and get all the details we need from the end-user's point of view for any service request."
"One of the best things about JIRA is that it searches for answers while questions are being typed so some tickets do not need to be submitted."
 

Cons

"We have found the documentation a bit confusing at times. This area could use some improvement."
"JIRA Service Management should make reporting easier. I would like something integrated with DevOps tools."
"In general, JIRA has no relation to customers or financials. Therefore, marketplace add-ons are needed to make it work for customer-facing systems."
"Initially, as a completely new user, the interface was not very user-friendly, with many cluttered options."
"As a consultant, I have used the support. Some of the support I have received has been good and other times it could improve."
"A lot of users have said that they want a feature that was on the on-prem version of Jira and the vendor can't deliver. They're either unwilling or unable to give feature parity."
"Jira Service Management should be more user-friendly."
"It would be beneficial if we could turn comments into subtasks or other JIRA tickets directly."
"Cost has prohibited us from switching entirely to this solution."
 

Pricing and Cost Advice

"After about six months, we started making a return on our investment at more than 300%."
"Agiloft has by far the best entry point for both cost and learning curve."
"The pricing is very competitive and I think that it is okay."
"But about the plugins, I found one plug-in — its name is Actionable Metric I think — and it is $3000. That is very expensive for users in Iran."
"We have an annual license with JIRA Service Management, but it is billed monthly."
"It is one of the premium products on the market, but it is very costly, especially in the Indian market."
"It costs around $150 to $200 per user."
"On a scale of one to five, with one being really high and five being good, I would rate the price of this solution as a four."
"I would rate the pricing a seven out of ten, where one is low price, and ten is high price. It's competitively priced."
"The price of the solution is becoming expensive and it should be reduced."
report
Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Help Desk Software solutions are best for your needs.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.
 

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews
No data available
Computer Software Company
20%
Financial Services Firm
9%
Manufacturing Company
8%
Government
7%
 

Company Size

By reviewers
Large Enterprise
Midsize Enterprise
Small Business
No data available
 

Questions from the Community

Ask a question
Earn 20 points
What do you like most about JIRA Service Management?
JIRA Service Management is a very user-friendly solution.
What is your experience regarding pricing and costs for JIRA Service Management?
We used Jira's free version for some time, and we used it as an offline service without communicating with the Jira team regarding the license.
 

Also Known As

No data available
JIRA Service Desk
 

Learn More

 

Overview

 

Sample Customers

EMC, ArcaTech Systems, Idera Pharmaceuticals, RBC, Affinity Service Group, Atrenta, DCG systems, ENKI, Hopkins County Board of Education, MVTS Technologies
mgm technology partners, Telestream, Build.com, Zend Technologies, OfficeDrop, PGS Software, American Diabetes Association, NEPTUNE Canada
Find out what your peers are saying about Agiloft Service Desk Suite vs. JIRA Service Management and other solutions. Updated: December 2024.
824,067 professionals have used our research since 2012.