Akamai CloudTest vs Oracle Application Testing Suite comparison

Akamai and Oracle are both solutions in the Performance Testing Tools category. Akamai is ranked #9 with an average rating of 8.0, while Oracle is ranked #14. Akamai holds a 2.5% mindshare in PTT, compared to Oracle’s 1.2% mindshare. Additionally, 85% of Akamai users are willing to recommend the solution, compared to 83% of Oracle users who would recommend it.

Akamai CloudTest

Read 7 Akamai CloudTest reviews

513 Views
371 Comparison Views

85% willing to recommend

Oracle Application Testing ...

Read 24 Oracle Application Testing Suite reviews

389 Views
229 Comparison Views

83% willing to recommend

Akamai CloudTest

Oracle Application Testing ...

Comparison Buyer's Guide

Download the report

Executive SummaryUpdated on Jan 6, 2025

Akamai CloudTest and Oracle Application Testing Suite compete in performance and load testing applications. Akamai appears to have the upper hand in pricing flexibility and support options, while Oracle offers a broader feature set that suits enterprises using Oracle products.

Features: Akamai CloudTest is known for scalability, real-time analytics, and effective web application stress testing. Oracle Application Testing Suite provides comprehensive tools for functional, regression, and load testing, alongside application lifecycle management, making it a robust solution for complex testing environments.

Room for Improvement: Akamai CloudTest could enhance its offering with more extensive integration capabilities and reporting features. Its user interface could also be more intuitive. Oracle Application Testing Suite might improve with quicker deployment options and more competitive pricing. Additionally, enhanced support for non-Oracle environments could broaden its appeal.

Ease of Deployment and Customer Service: Akamai CloudTest offers a cloud-based deployment praised for its quick setup and scalability, providing a smooth user experience. Oracle's suite, often deployed on-premise, requires more time for setup but integrates well with Oracle environments. Akamai's customer service receives positive feedback, while Oracle's service proves beneficial for existing Oracle clients.

Pricing and ROI: Akamai CloudTest's cost-effectiveness and pay-as-you-go model offer good ROI for smaller businesses needing scalability. While Oracle Application Testing Suite has higher upfront costs, its comprehensive features justify the investment over time, especially for businesses leveraging the Oracle ecosystem.

To learn more, read our detailed Akamai CloudTest vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite Report (Updated: February 2025).

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

February 2025

Download the complete report

Helped 845,406 peers since 2012

Review summaries and opinions

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Categories and Ranking

Akamai CloudTest

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

9th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

8th

Average Rating

7.6

Reviews Sentiment

7.5

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

No ranking in other categories

Oracle Application Testing ...

Ranking in Performance Testing Tools

14th

Ranking in Load Testing Tools

15th

Average Rating

7.8

Reviews Sentiment

7.0

Number of Reviews

Ranking in other categories

Functional Testing Tools (25th)

Mindshare comparison

As of April 2025, in the Performance Testing Tools category, the mindshare of Akamai CloudTest is 2.5%, up from 1.7% compared to the previous year. The mindshare of Oracle Application Testing Suite is 1.2%, up from 1.2% compared to the previous year. It is calculated based on PeerSpot user engagement data.

Performance Testing Tools

Featured Reviews

Vinod Patil

Senior Manager - Performance Architect at Publicis Sapient

Is user-friendly and offers live monitoring

Extending the same cloud tool to make it app native so that it can help with device performance testing towards HTTP requests and responses. If you can have a front-end tool like Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. If you have some integration with Google's Core Web Vitals, it would be great. I want the tool to have IP spoofing because whenever you do load testing, you will have a little bit of static IP based on a particular load generator. If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement. Having integration to APM tools, like Dynatrace or AppDynamics, the way we have in the load tools, would be good.

Read full review

Rishabh-Sharma

Senior Engineer at Cignity Technology

Requires little maintenance, is stable, and easy to deploy

Oracle Application Testing Suite can improve by covering more browsers as compared to other solutions because they're considering the Edge browser as well, but the solution is working on different Windows operating platforms. For example, in our current Windows 2012 R2 server, if I want to automate the Edge browser, I need to upgrade that particular Windows to Windows 10.1 or some other Windows platform, because it's not supported in Windows 2012 feature. That is an issue. If cross-browsers can be incorporated, then support should be provided. There should be a single operating system where everything can be incorporated. I have faced issues with some indexing items. For example, the solution is able to derive some properties from the screen, such as button locations or text locations, but there are some elements, for example, unnamed buttons or text, where there is no name or ID or any other identifying information. Indexing doesn't always work, and we have to go to those elements manually and inspect them to determine their class, and then input that information into the system.

Read full review

Quotes from Members

We asked business professionals to review the solutions they use. Here are some excerpts of what they said:

Pros

"The level of support is quite good and the integration is also very flexible."

"The tool is very user-friendly, so you can save a lot of time in terms of your preparation activities."

"This is an awesome performance testing tool for web based applications, able to generate load multiple geographies, dynamic ramp-up to any levels of virtual users."

"The solution is very stable."

"From my own experience, if you're talking about load testing and performance testing then definitely you should go for CloudTest. Because when we compared CloudTest with Performance Center, cost wise it was a better solution. It is easy to use as well, and you can definitely get an automation engineer or a performance engineer with very little exposure to any programming or scripting language such as JavaScript. I would definitely recommend this solution and would rate it at eight on a scale from one to ten."

"The graphics are very intuitive and it's very easy to get scale of development."

"User friendly UI / Tree view to work with adding steps."

"Has good automation and load-testing capabilities."

"We like that we don't need a separate management tool. This is a good feature. It also has an inbuilt performance tool which is on Flash. It has very good record and playback feature as well. The inspection tool is also very good. Overall, since it comes with all the three packages, it's very good."

"We do not need a separate test management tool because we have there is a management tool. That is a very good feature. Secondly, it has an inbuilt performance testing tool, which is on flash. It has very good record and playback features as well. And apart from that, there is a good inspection feature. Since it comes with all of the packages, it's very good."

"I like the functional testing. There's a product inside OATS called OLT, Oracle Load Testing. You can do the load testing without depending on any other tool"

"The function test feature is valuable."

"The solution is scalable."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite pros

Cons

"The test clip should be more user-friendly."

"Akamai cloud test integration into our current CI/CD pipelines (i.e.) identify and resolve the issues during the sprint phase which helps in delivering an absolute product and reduces time to market/release."

"If we have an option of just making the real-time scenario, like having IP spoofing, and the range of IPs dynamically gets changed with the request just to mimic the real-time user behavior, then it would be a good improvement."

"It's a manual process to whitelist respective internal IPs in coordination with web operations team to access Soasta. Availability of any standardized tool from Soasta will make setup process easy."

"In terms of improvement, I think integration of these tools with the leading EPM tools would be good. It would help to seamlessly integrate to Dynatrace or AppDynamics to understand what the profiling looks like when generating a load."

"To provide test automation support for other products like SAP, Windows and Java Applications when it comes to Functional Test Automation testing."

"The pathfinding at times is slow when we are using it. The tool's performance can be improved."

"It needs to be compatible with all browsers."

"The dashboards need to be simplified and made more user-friendly."

"Lacks patches for new OS systems and doesn't work on a Mac."

"I would like to see better dashboards."

"I have faced issues with some indexing items."

"If there's a feature we want in OATS that's missing and we report that to Oracle, it takes a long time."

More Oracle Application Testing Suite cons

Pricing and Cost Advice

"Running cost is very low."

"We have a yearly license, and I would give it a rating of three out of five."

"The tool's price is at an intermediate level. When you compare it with other enterprise load testing tools, it falls under the average category."

"The complete package, including load testing and performance analysis, has a licensing fee."

"The price of the Oracle Application Testing Suite is not expensive. It is less expensive than other solutions."

"There are no costs in addition to the standard licensing fees."

"Customers need to negotiate properly to get the tool at a lower price."

"ORACLE is giving at a very competitive rates to all its customers, and its a simple licensing process."

See which vendors are best for you

Use our free recommendation engine to learn which Performance Testing Tools solutions are best for your needs.

See recommendations

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

Top Industries

By visitors reading reviews

Financial Services Firm

16%

Insurance Company

11%

Computer Software Company

10%

Manufacturing Company

Government

17%

Computer Software Company

16%

Manufacturing Company

Financial Services Firm

Company Size

By reviewers

Large Enterprise

Midsize Enterprise

Small Business

Questions from the Community

What needs improvement with Akamai CloudTest?

See all answers

What is your primary use case for Akamai CloudTest?

I use the solution in my company for load testing. You can say that it is used on the API and then for web page-level load testing.

See all answers

What advice do you have for others considering Akamai CloudTest?

The tool's very first benefit is zero maintenance. You need not take care of your controller or load generator, so there is zero maintenance. The second benefit of the tool would be in the area of ...

See all answers

Ask a question

Earn 20 points

Comparisons

Apache JMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 39% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 20% of the time

Tricentis NeoLoad vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 16% of the time

BlazeMeter vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 12% of the time

OpenText Enterprise Performance Engineering (LoadRunner Enterprise) vs Akamai CloudTest

Compared 12% of the time

More Akamai CloudTest Competitors

Tricentis Tosca vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 36% of the time

OpenText UFT One vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 23% of the time

Apache JMeter vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 10% of the time

OpenText LoadRunner Professional vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 8% of the time

k6 Open Source vs Oracle Application Testing Suite

Compared 7% of the time

More Oracle Application Testing Suite Competitors

Product Reports

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest

March 2025

Download Akamai CloudTest product report

Buyer's Guide

Oracle Application Testing Suite

March 2025

Download Oracle Application Testing Suite product report

Also Known As

SOASTA CloudTest

OATS

Overview

Soasta's CloudTest rapidly builds realistic test scenarios using real user data, then tests, analyzes and repairs faster. CloudTest's visual test environment and real-time analytics test your website, mobile app and api backend to give you a streaming view of all your performance data while tests run from back-end systems to front end performance.

Akamai

Application Testing Suite is a comprehensive, integrated testing solution that ensures the quality, scalability, and availability of your Web applications, Web Services, packaged Oracle Applications and Oracle databases.

Oracle

Sample Customers

Chester Zoo

Comic Relief UK, The Forestry Commission, TAFE SA, Silentnight Group, Victorian Department of Primary Industries

Buyer's Guide

Akamai CloudTest vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

February 2025

Free Report: Akamai CloudTest vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite

Find out what your peers are saying about Akamai CloudTest vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite and other solutions. Updated: February 2025.

DOWNLOAD NOW

845,406 professionals have used our research since 2012.

See our Akamai CloudTest vs. Oracle Application Testing Suite report.

See our list of best Performance Testing Tools vendors and best Load Testing Tools vendors.

We monitor all Performance Testing Tools reviews to prevent fraudulent reviews and keep review quality high. We do not post reviews by company employees or direct competitors. We validate each review for authenticity via cross-reference with LinkedIn, and personal follow-up with the reviewer when necessary.